Gobekli Tepe: your questions answered

The First Post's report from an archaeological dig in Turkey has sparked interest worldwide. Here are the answers to some frequently asked questions

LAST UPDATED AT 00:00 ON Mon 30 Oct 2006

The archaeological team at Gobekli, working under Klaus Schmidt, has used radiocarbon analysis on the soils adhering to the stones. The analysis shows that the main stones at Gobekli Tepe were erected between 10,000 and 9,000 BC. The characteristics of flint arrowheads found here confirm these dates.Q: How big is the site?A: So far, 40-odd standing stones (two to four metres high) have been dug out. They are T-shaped and returning to Gobekli at specified times of the year.

Q: Why was the site buried in 8,000BC?A: No one knows. But the way the dust is packed around the stones shows that Gobekli was entombed deliberately, and with some care.
pic

Q: How do they know it's a temple?
A: Evidence of any domestic use is entirely lacking. No remains of settled human habitation have been found nearby. But human skeletons have been found, in telling positions, which indicate that Gobekli was possibly a funerary complex, a shrine that celebrated the life and death of the hunters. It seems people brought the corpses of relatives here, and installed them in open niches by the stones. The many rock carvings on the stones also appear more ritualistic than domestic; likewise, the architectural arrangement of Gobekli prefigures much later Stone Age temples - like Avebury or Stonehenge.

Q: How do they know the recently uncovered sculpture is a 'reptile'?A: They don't know. Schmidt thinks it may be a reptile but isn't sure. Gobekli Tepe is so bizarre - and the newest finds so mysterious - no consensus has yet developed. Others believe the sculpture shows a wolf, a cat, or some other mammal. It possibly represents a kind of animal-spirit, watching over the dead.

Q: Is there really a link with the Garden of Eden?A: The idea that the Eden story is a kind of allegorical folk memory - of the switch from hunter-gathering to farming - is not a new one: it's been canvassed by writer Hugh Brody, among others. What is new is the combination of data that links Genesis to this area of Turkey, and very early farming to this area: thus placing a 'metaphorical Eden' arguably in these environs. However, Klaus Schmidt emphasises that this is just a theory: "Gobekli Tepe is extraordinary enough, without speculation".

Q: How does the world of archaeology perceive Gobekli?A: Academics agree on the site's revolutionary implications for our view of Stone Age civilisation and religion. No one knew Neolithic people were this artistic and leisured. Harald Hauptman at Heidelberg University believes the discoveries at Gobekli rank with the first uncovering of cave paintings in Lascaux, France in the 1940s. South African expert in palaeolithic art David Lewis Williams calls Gobekli Tepe "the most important archaeological dig anywhere in the world". · 

Read more about

Comments

The Annunaki, gods in ancient Sumerian stories, sent younger gods, the Igigi, to Earth to watch over ancient humans and to erect monuments for the Annunaki. The Igigi complained of the hard physical labor and decided to enslave humans to do the work. According to the legends they also interbred with humans creating a giant race, and instructed humans in new technologies, possibly agriculture. After this crossbreed got out of control the gods flooded earth to rid it of them but spared some humans. Perhaps the site at Gobekli Tepe was purposely buried in accordance with the gods' will to hide evidence of the inbred giants.
Our myths and religions, though changed and distorted over time, must hold some amount of truth and significance for them to be passed down. Some read "ancient aliens" for gods in many ancient myths. There's obviously no way to prove this, but it's an interesting idea when one is examining the many mysteries of ancient megalithic sites that were built by extremely primitive peoples around the world generally close to the birth of agriculture in each region.

They are not of this planet!

Even though domestic evidence is not visible, does that actually meen that it wasnt a dwelling, if someone took the time to bury this site,isnt it possible that they took the time to remove all eveidence that it was lived in?? Can you be sure that the remains found there were not being gaurded,possibly by a high priest or equilivlant?....

Comments are now closed on this article