What now for the ‘Snooper’s Charter’?
Labour and human rights groups hail victory after surveillance act ruled unlawful in personal blow to Theresa May
Theresa May’s signature digital surveillance bill, dubbed a ‘Snooper’s Charter’ by critics, has been deemed unlawful by the courts. It is a major blow to the Government and security services.
The sweeping powers created in the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, which allow police to hack into phones and check an individual’s browsing history for up to a year, have proved “hugely controversial and gave British police some of the most far-reaching powers in Europe”, says the Daily Mail.
Now three appeal judges have agreed with a 2016 European Court of Justice decision and ruled that parts of the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (Dripa), which paved the way for May’s legislation, are illegal.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The ruling argues that Dripa allowed police and other public bodies to authorise their own access without adequate oversight and was “inconsistent with EU law” because of this lack of safeguards, including the absence of “prior review by a court or independent administrative authority”.
Liberty, the human rights group which brought the case on behalf of Labour’s deputy leader Tom Watson, said the ruling meant significant parts of the law would now have to be changed.
The Daily Mirror says the ruling will be particularly embarrassingly for the Prime Minister, not only because she defended the legislation while Home Secretary, but as the original complaint was part-made by Tory MP David Davis - who is now her Brexit Secretary. Davis withdrew his complaint when he joined the Government in July 2016.
Speaking to reporters after the decision, Watson said: “This legislation was flawed from the start. The Government must now bring forward changes to ensure that hundreds of thousands of people, many of whom are innocent victims or witnesses to crime, are protected by a system of independent approval for access to communications data.”
Security minister Ben Wallace responded by saying the judgement related to legislation that was no longer in force and so would not affect the way law enforcement would tackle crime.
Following previous defeats in the High Court and European Court of Justice, and perhaps anticipating yesterday’s ruling, “the Government has already been forced to admit that chunks of the Investigatory Powers Act are illegal”, writes Rebecca Hill in The Register. Last November, it issued a set of amendments which “it hoped would plaster over the faults and bring [the Act] into line”.
Despite attempts to address the issue of oversight, Liberty slammed the “half-baked plans” that “do not even fully comply with past court rulings requiring mandatory safeguards”.
Of particular concern to privacy activists was the plan to lower the threshold for “serious crime” to six months (rather than three years) in prison, “effectively making it easier for the government to slurp up people’s data”, says Hill.
Ministers have long said the Act’s sweeping powers are needed to help in the fight against terrorism and cyber crime “but critics said it is an attack on privacy and an affront to civil liberties”, and it faced stiff opposition in the Commons and the Lords, says the Mail.
Peers also warned that it would “chill” journalism and could have an impact on whistleblowing and stop criticism of figures such as ex-BHS boss Sir Philip Green.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
6 presumed dead in Baltimore bridge collapse
Speed Read A massive cargo ship hit a support pillar of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, causing it to crumple
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Best music albums: new releases of 2024
The Week Recommends A round-up of the best pop, dance, indie, classical and rock releases
By The Week UK Published
-
Senegal's Bassirou Diomaye Faye: from prison to Africa's youngest elected leader
Why everyone's talking about The 44-year-old has promised to shake up the establishment and enact economic reforms
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Will Aukus pact survive a second Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question US, UK and Australia seek to expand 'game-changer' defence partnership ahead of Republican's possible return to White House
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Farewell to Theresa May: a PM consumed by Brexit
Talking Point Maidenhead MP standing down at next general election
By The Week UK Published
-
What do we know about China's global cyber operations?
Today's Big Question A tranche of leaked documents offers new insight into Beijing's sprawling mercenary hacking operation
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
It's the economy, Sunak: has 'Rishession' halted Tory fightback?
Today's Big Question PM's pledge to deliver economic growth is 'in tatters' as stagnation and falling living standards threaten Tory election wipeout
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Why your local council may be going bust
The Explainer Across England, local councils are suffering from grave financial problems
By The Week UK Published
-
Rishi Sunak and the right-wing press: heading for divorce?
Talking Point The Telegraph launches 'assault' on PM just as many Tory MPs are contemplating losing their seats
By Keumars Afifi-Sabet, The Week UK Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published