What will Parliament repairs cost - and where will MPs go?
Minsters have voted to vacate Westminster for major restorations
MPs have voted to move out of the Palace of Westminster while much-needed restoration work is carried out.
Ministers had proposed setting up a committee to assess whether MPs and peers should move out of the Houses of Parliament, effectively delaying a final decision, but on Wednesday the Commons narrowly passed a cross-party amendment in favour of a “full and timely decant”.
What is the problem?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Experts have long claimed the Palace of Westminster is crumbling into ruin. They argue that the building was never designed to house the 7,500 people currently working in it, who are joined by more than a million visitors a year.
The greatest causes for concern are the plumbing and wiring, some of which has not been replaced since the construction of the building was completed in the 1870s, reports CNN.
Officials say the Palace is at risk of a “catastrophic failure” such as a flood or fire because the plumbing and electrical infrastructure is “no longer fit for purpose”.
Work is also needed to repair crumbling stonework, remove asbestos, restore 4,000 windows and repair damaged roofs, says The Independent.
Opening this week’s debate, Andrea Leadsom, the Leader of the House, said that while Parliament remains “structurally sound”, the risk of fire is now “critical”. More than 60 incidents in the past ten years could have caused serious harm, she said.
Former cabinet minister Damian Green said it was not a “wild exaggeration” to say that Parliament is a “death trap”.
When will the move happen and how much will it cost?
Although Wednesday’s vote was a big step forward, the move from the Palace of Westminster will require a full Act of Parliament and is unlikely to happen until 2025.
It will be the first time either House has moved out of the Victorian-era Palace since the Commons chamber was destroyed by a bomb in 1941.
The MPs’ departure will reduce the cost of the repairs, but the bill remains substantial. Deloitte estimates that the work will cost taxpayers between £3.5bn and £3.9bn and will take about six years.
What else could be done?
Alternative options included a partial move, which would see the Commons and Lords move out one after the other, and would have cost an estimated £4.4bn over 11 years. This was rejected as too slow, too expensive and too disruptive to Parliamentary business.
Another proposal, costing £5.7bn over 35 years, would have allowed both Houses to remain in situ, but was dismissed on similar grounds.
Sky News says the so-called “decant” was “bitterly opposed” by a large group of veteran MPs - mostly Conservatives - who proposed an amendment that would have kept the Commons inside the Houses of Parliament.
Younger MPs told Sky News the older MPs are motivated by self-interest and simply do not want to serve the final years of their political careers in temporary accommodation.
“Downing Street also favoured delaying the decision,” says The Guardian, although one source claimed Theresa May had previously expressed concerns about health and safety issues and had argued for a full decant.
In a bid to appease some MPs and peers, Leadsom promised new legislation that would guarantee a return to the Palace after work had been completed, “aimed at addressing fears they will never return to the historic building”, says The Sun.
What about a permanent move away?
Some commentators, including the Daily Mirror’s politics editor Jason Beattie, have advocated abandoning the Palace for good and moving to a new building that “reflects modern Britain”.
Arguing that the renovation will cost the equivalent of four London Shards, or almost six hospitals at £300m each, Beattie proposes instead building a new House of Commons chamber with modern facilities, sufficient office space and decent plumbing. “If you were truly adventurous, you could ditch the adversarial design of the current chamber and introduce a horse-shoe shape that promotes a more inclusive, consensual style of politics,” he adds.
David Linden, SNP MP for Glasgow East, has also argued for a permanent move away from Westminster.
Speaking to BT News, he said the refurbishment offers a chance to move out of the “Westminster bubble”, with the current site turned into a museum and a new “modest” parliament developed in the Midlands.
“You can’t have absolutely everything just concentrated in this small corner of the UK,” Linden said. “If you’re truly going to be a kingdom of equals then start spreading some of the jobs and power about a wee bit.”
However, an SNP amendment floating a permanent move away from Westminster was soundly rejected by MPs.
Where will MPs go?
While several alternative locations have been touted in the past, including a futuristic chamber that would sit on the Thames, cost and practicality issues mean a site will have to be found within the area around the Palace of Westminster.
The most likely scenario is that MPs will move to Richmond House, in Whitehall, currently home to the Department of Health and Social Care, while peers could use the Queen Elizabeth II Centre, a conference facility just off Parliament Square.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Housing costs: the root of US economic malaise?
speed read Many voters are troubled by the housing affordability crisis
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - March 18, 2024
Cartoons Monday's cartoons - a slimy slithering app, defying gravity, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Putin's preordained win marred by protests
speed read Voters participated in a silent protest — endorsed by late opposition leader Alexei Navalny — against the president
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
It's the economy, Sunak: has 'Rishession' halted Tory fightback?
Today's Big Question PM's pledge to deliver economic growth is 'in tatters' as stagnation and falling living standards threaten Tory election wipeout
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Why your local council may be going bust
The Explainer Across England, local councils are suffering from grave financial problems
By The Week UK Published
-
Rishi Sunak and the right-wing press: heading for divorce?
Talking Point The Telegraph launches 'assault' on PM just as many Tory MPs are contemplating losing their seats
By Keumars Afifi-Sabet, The Week UK Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
How the biggest election year in history might play out
The Explainer Votes in world's biggest democracies, as well as its most 'despotic' and 'stressed' countries, face threats of violence and suppression
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Good democracies include their poorest citizens. The UK excludes them'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
What obstacles will Rishi Sunak have to overcome in the New Year?
Today's Big Question PM avoids defeat on Rwanda bill but faces rebellion within Tory party, threats from Nigel Farage and his own unpopularity
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published