Cadbury’s falls to Kraft’s £11.7 billion offer
As the chocolate maker gets swallowed up, some argue it still went too cheaply
Just one day since Hershey were rumoured to be preparing a bid for Cadbury, the British confectioner has agreed terms overnight with original suitor Kraft for £11.7 billion. After more than four months of public verbal sparring, the British chocolate maker, which dates back to 1824 when Quaker John Cadbury first introduced cocoa-based hot drinks to his tea shop, joins a long list of UK brands that have fallen to foreign takeovers in recent years. Among them are Boots, Jaguar Land Rover, P&O, Pilkington, Corus and ICI.
At a minimum, Kraft’s long courtship of Cadbury proves the value of playing hard to get. An offer of 770p a share last September – described as “derisory” by Cadbury chairman Roger Carr – had by last night become an acceptable 850p a share (made up of 840p plus a 10p dividend).
The deal was done as Kraft faced a midnight deadline imposed by takeover authorities to make a final offer. Led by chief executive Irene Rosenfeld, who has been in London selling the deal for more than a week, Kraft's bid represents a five per cent premium over the value of Cadbury at its current share price of 807.5p.
“On Tuesday the war of words stops and Kraft has to put a sensible offer on the table, otherwise Rosenfeld will have to explain to her shareholders just why she sold one of Kraft’s best growth platforms in the US” explained Graham Jones, an analyst at Panmure Gordon, referring to Kraft's sale of its pizza business to raise cash for the Cadbury bid.
Just days ago, Carr was urging Cadbury shareholders not to let Kraft “steal” the 186-year-old confectionery business while Cadbury chief executive Todd Stitzer accused Rosenfeld of a history of "over-promising and Under-delivering".
Unions warned a Kraft buyout could trigger substantial job losses among Cadbury’s 45,000-strong worldwide workforce, which included more than 9,000 in Britain.
Chocolate connoisseurs have been concerned that Kraft will cut corners that diminish its product, particularly in Ireland where Cadbury products like Golden Crisp and Tiffin surpass its British selections.
The takeover is the biggest deal in the sweets sector since Nestle bought Rowntree in 1988. Kraft maintains it is "eager to build upon Cadbury's iconic brands and strong British heritage".
But is 850 pence for Cadbury a good deal? No, says David Cumming, head of UK equities at Standard Life, just before the 850p deal was accepted. "If Kraft want to get Cadbury's they need to pay a full price to get long-term shareholders like that on their side and that price would have to be, in my view, above £9 a share. Cadbury is quite a well-run business and they've done a good job, their existing management team."
Too late. ·
Comments are now closed on this article














Comments
Actually its not too late. It's the shareholders who decide -- not the board -- and that game hasn't yet been played out.
Irene Rosenfeld has been quoted as saying she wants to build a "global powerhouse". What the hell for?-- its a sweet business for goodness sake! Perhaps some shareholders have some sense left and will refuse to be seduced by this idiotic rant that obscures the value of the company.
Or is Rosenfeld the Americans' version of Fred Goodwin? Has she become fixated with Cadbury like Goodwin was fixated by Amro? The difference, of course, is that Rosenfeld isn't paying over the odds.
Kraft actually have a pretty good record with looking after iconic brands, for example Vegemite (with which they've been involved since 1925). Unlike some of the alternative suitors, there is at least no current record of them seeking to subsitute partially hydrogenated vegetable fats for cocoa butter in chocolate, and lobbying the US Food & Drug Administration to change the definition of chocolate to accomodate this.
I've bought my last Cadbury's chocolate. Never again.