Business leaders let down by Copenhagen failure
Richard Branson suggests business may have to ‘go it alone’ without political deal
The failure of world leaders in Copenhagen to reach meaningful agreement on carbon emissions is not merely disappointing to climate activists: business leaders say the political failure to set reduction targets leaves them without enough certainty to justify the massive investments needed to begin to move toward low-emissions economies.
The political order is widely felt to have substantially let down business leaders. Yesterday, Yvo de Boer, chief UN climate change official, said he expects to see "growing demands on the part of business to see this accord turned into something that is legally binding".
Peter Voser, chief executive of Dutch Shell, said more was needed. "It remains unclear how this political willingness will translate intoconcrete steps." Wulf Bernotat, chief executive of the European energy group Eon, warned cuts would "depend on further progress" in the UN talks. Bankers say Copenhagen's failure is likely to undermine confidence in the market for carbon credits.
US business leaders, too, say tougher clean energy standards and a price floor for oil and gas supplies would help raise green-tech investment and force companies to invest in less-polluting equipment. By some estimates, the private sector will need to provide 90 per cent of the $500bn-a-year investment needed to keep global warming at or below two degrees.
But with individual countries now supposed to fill in details of planned cuts in greenhouse gas emissions that the Copenhagen accords failed to establish, disappointment at the outcome has led some business leaders to conclude that business cannot wait for politicians to act.
Sir Richard Branson told Bloomberg he believes industry will have to go it alone. "We owe it to the public to get our house in order," he said. "If the governments won't set targets then I would suggest that the airlines get together and do it themselves and set an example."
Last week, businesses including Microsoft, Duke Energy, Nike, and Dow Chemical wrote to President Obama urging him to push for a treaty with "substantial" financing goals. "Such an agreement will provide the market certainty that will unleash the investments needed to create jobs," the letter concluded.
With the failure of Copenhagen apparent, there is a growing feeling that expecting politicians to act beyond short-term political self-interest is itself poor thinking. Lester Brown, president of the Washington-based Earth Policy Institute, says our politicians are simply not up to the task. "They are obsolete. They take too long to negotiate and ratify. In this case, the game may be over by then."
But while Obama and other political leaders brace themselves for the fall-out for coming home empty-handed, some businesses say the elevation of the global warming issue in Copenhagen to a global imperative is still of some benefit.
"It's helpful," says Russell Mills, global director energy and climate-change policy at Dow Europe. "The key issue is we have started on a global process."
ends ·
Comments are now closed on this article















Comments
'Bankers say Copenhagen's failure is likely to undermine confidence in the market for carbon credits.'
Now you got it. Bankers never cared for climate. They only cared for making money via the crazy scam of carbon credit. Now because they cannot do that they are disappointed.
As for business leadres like Branson, you are supposed to do what is good in your judgement and doable . Why do you have to wait for governmental diktats?
We should try to conserve energy no matter what. Because it's only energy that we ultimately pay for. Nobody pays for matter (such as kerosene for airline industry). You pay for the energy that is needed to get it out of the ground in form of petroleum, process it to get kerosene, transport it to your planes and then burn to get passengers and cargo from A to B. And make money.
Carbon, hydogen and oxygen in kerosene were always there. Nobody made them. When kerosene burns and becomes CO2 and H2O, they same number of C, O and H are returned to the atmosprere. Wasted energy is wasted money. If we can get energy in varieties of ways we should explore all as decent human beings. This continuos attachment in the Westernal financial world for scams like carbon trading should have no place in real productive business.
The UN may "expect to see" business clamouring for more regulationn but 3 publicity hungry businessmen isn't that many.
We all should go it alone. Politicians love conferences and resolutions, they delay actually doing anything practical. Having been going it alone for decades with reducing my carbon footprint and living sustainably, I think the best way is for everyone to do what they can, every country also; no need for argreements which are never met anyway. It's always possible to put pressure on the countries doing the least by naming and shamming and, if necessary, boycots. Dealing with deniers is something countries have to figure for themselves, I would personally favour imprisonment. The crime of trashing the planet and leaving a world unfit for our grandchildren dwarfs all others and should carry heavy penalties. Then maybe the epsilons refusing to accept the science in order to continue their selfish, greedy ways will at least shut up.
The whole 'climate change' parley was a scam anyway, to line the pockets of some very wealthy individuals such as Al Gore and the IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri, as well as speculators and traders in carbon commodities. As Mike Hulme, Professor of Climate Change at the infamous UEA, mentioned in the CRU Climategate scandal, said, "The function of climate change...is not as a lower-case environmental phenomenon to be solved...It really is not about stopping climate chaos. Instead, we need to see how we can use the idea of climate change...to rethink how we take forward our political, social, economic and personal projects over the decades to come...We need to ask not what we can do for climate change, but to ask what climate change can do for us...climate change takes on new meanings and serves new purposes...Rather than asking 'how do we solve climate change?' we need to turn the question around and ask: 'how does the idea of climate change alter the way we arrive at and achieve our personal aspirations...?'"
Of course 'business leaders' are disappointed - they were hoping to make a killing out of us all as well. Sir Richard Branson - what a hypocrite! He's trying to develop space tourism. Any idea how incredibly wasteful that is?!