Tax avoiders could be named and shamed under new rules

Government to crack down on tax avoidance schemes like the one used by Jimmy Carr

LAST UPDATED AT 09:21 ON Mon 23 Jul 2012

THE GOVERNMENT is to launch a crackdown on tax avoidance schemes and could force finance companies to 'name and shame' their clients by handing details to the taxman. The reforms, to be announced by treasury minister David Gauke, will be put forward in a consultation document and could lead to changes in the law by the end of next year.
 
They come in the wake of the row over the tax affairs of comedian Jimmy Carr, which were described as "morally wrong" by the Prime Minister last month. Carr used a technically legal scheme to shelter more than £3m a year from the taxman using a Jersey-based system known as K2.
 
"The Treasury estimates that 14 per cent of all unpaid tax income is due to aggressive avoidance schemes. Although they are not illegal, ministers are determined to clamp down on them," reports the BBC.
 
The proposed reforms will allow the Revenue to pursue thousands of people who shelter their wealth by using intermediary companies in Jersey and other tax havens.
 
The Guardian explained how the new system would work. "Officials often hit a dead end when investigating schemes that are based offshore but, under the proposals, UK promoters will be made to hand over customer databases. That information will be used to formally warn clients about the deals they have signed up to and to work out the amount of tax they would owe if the scheme failed."
 
An editorial in The Times described the government's initiative as "important and welcome", but warned that the consultation does not go far enough.
 
"The best way of conducting tax policy is that individuals should feel a sense of compunction about paying a fair share. The beneficiaries of avoidance know that a tax bill of lower than 10 per cent of income is cheating, even though it may be perfectly legal," said the paper.
 
However, the same paper also suggested the Government's crackdown on tax avoidance is being threatened by a lack of resources at the Revenue. It said there are currently 20,000 unresolved tax disputes backed up in the system.
 
"Staff cuts, office closures and poor morale stemming from pay freezes and pension cuts are also biting," the paper added.
 
Labour is sceptical about the changes, according to the Guardian. "One shadow minister said the Tories were so closely associated with tax avoiders they would not have the political will necessary to change the tax system."
 
Gauke's announcement will come at Policy Exchange, the day after the Mail on Sunday revealed that one of the think tank's trustees, Conservative donor George Robinson, was revealed to have been involved in an aggressive tax avoidance scheme and ordered to pay millions to the government. · 

Disqus - noscript

What a load of codswallop and just demonstrative of the inferior level of politicians that we have running the country! There is absolutely no moral imperative whatsoever to volunteer to increase ones contribution to the states budget that is not called for by law. The money that I earn belongs to me and not to the state unless legally called for within Inland Revenue rules. . Simply because Cameron and Co have this irresistible impulse to send large sums of that they have exhorted from taxpayers to foreign countries and launch democratically unauthorised military adventures against foreign interests that have done us no harm is no reason to suggest that not to approve of volunteering to financially support this political grandstanding is immoral. The betrayal of the UK citizenry by our elected politicians whereby they give higher priority to foreign economic requirements above that of the people who elected and pay for them is what constitutes the immorality and the sooner these two leading idiots are removed, the better!

What a selfish greedy unpleasant person you must be. There are millions of families on low earnings paying their due tax, they do not have the money to pay accountants and what have you to fiddle their tax returns. Yet someone like you is saying it is morally right to make your profits in this country on the backs of the low paid and then think it is your right to salt the money away in off shore banks. When someone is earning upwards of £150,000.00 a year they will be paying 45% tax which leaves them with £82,000.00, someone at the bottom of the ladder is paying no tax which leaves them with £14,000.00 a year how can you justify dodging the tax man when you see figures like this, do you not feel any guilt at all?

Dear Need Guidance! Your Nom de Plume says it all. You do either need guidance on how to read or on understanding what you have read. All I observe in your contribution is that you make several derogatory accusations that you have dreamt up and certainly do not constitute a rational response to any one of the opinions that I express in the contribution that I made. I do suggest that you get somewhat else to read it and explain it to you. After you have done that, take each point and respond to it individually. If you do that, it just might make sense! Oh, why don’t you use your own true name to criticise? You are not shy, surely?

For further concise, balanced comment and analysis on the week's news, try The Week magazine. Subscribe today and get 6 issues completely free.