Empty seats at the Etihad as City take Euro bow
Talking point: Man City spent millions getting to the Champions League, but more fans turned out to watch Wigan
MANCHESTER City's debut in the Champions League was a curious one says James Ducker in the Times. "Anticipation among the City faithful was evident but it was a strange atmosphere. Perhaps because there has been so much talk of Champions League football in these parts that it felt more familiar to the natives than it actually is."
Indeed, there were plenty of spare seats at the Etihad Stadium as Roberto Mancini's side started well in their first European match since 1968. But despite a good first half they fell behind against Napoli in the second period before Aleksander Kolarov spared their blushes with an equaliser from a free kick. The game ended 1-1.
Afterwards the Italian manager blamed the curate's egg of a performance on first night jitters. "This game, we were so nervous – all the players. It surprised me," he said.
Among the crowd was Mancini's father Aldo, watching his son's City side for the first time. But Roberto admitted that he would not have been overly impressed. He told the Sun: "I'll wait for him to criticise me tonight, that's the first thing for me."
But he shouldn't be too harsh. Kolarov's goal at least "averted the ultimate disaster", said James Lawton in the Independent. "City had promised the world but in the end they at least preserved a little corner of it."
Of more concern would have been the attendance. "City's supporters have endured some thin moments over the years, so it was surprising that their first game in the European Cup since 1968 had not sold out," says Daniel Taylor in the Guardian. "City had fully anticipated a sell-out when the draw was made and it is a strange set of circumstances given that they have been selling out in the Premier League so far this season." He points out that there were 2,500 more fans at the Etihad stadium to watch the game against Wigan on Saturday than turned out to watch Napoli.
But City had an audience beyond Manchester, says Jason Burt in the Telegraph: "The rest of Europe was always going to take notice of this encounter even if there was disappointment that despite reducing ticket prices and carrying out an extensive advertising campaign, the stadium was not sold out."
The real worry for City's owners is that having spent hundreds of millions to get to the promised land, no-one seems that concerned. "For all the hype, the Champions League at this stage no longer has the allure of old," says Taylor. ·
Comments are now closed on this article

















Comments
As mentioned due to UEFA rules the capacity was reduced to 45k and we sold just over 44k. Also previously mentioned Napoli sold 2.2k out of 2.8k so 600 spare seats from them. Coupled with the usual ticket office fiasco that saw up to 300 city fans stranded outside and the usual family stand members that didnt/dont bring small children to night time games (100+) then the game was pretty much a sell out. Internet journalism is so lazy, its not difficult to find out the facts
They only get a full house at Old Trafford because their fans have no choice about buying tickets for CL & cup games. They just debit their cards. So if the fans have been made to pay, they might as well go or give the ticket to a mate. City treat their fans a lot better. They know how hard things are for the average fan and do everything possible to help, i.e. additional games like this are optional!!!
They don't hang us upside down and shake the change out of our pockets like the other lot...
Up yours,
Blue Moony
This obsession with seat counting amongst some of the media points to a bias against a City. As with all UEFA games owing to the advertising hoardings taking out the first three rows of seats around 3 sides of the stadium, the capacity for games at Etihad is reduced to 45,000. Taking into account that Napoli didint sell out their full allocation the crowd was announced as 44,026, hardly masses of empty seats there don't you agree