Fracking plans approved by MPs: why all the fuss?

Dec 17, 2015

Ministers accused of 'sneaking' in move to allow fracking beneath national parks


Controversial plans to allow fracking beneath national parks were approved in parliament yesterday afternoon fuelling accusations that ministers "sneaked" the move through a "parliamentary backdoor".

Campaigners criticised the lack of a Commons debate on the issue - and said the government's plans represented a U-turn on its previous pledge to ban fracking in national parks.

What is fracking?
Hydraulic fracturing is a 21st-century form of energy extraction that involves pumping huge amounts of water, sand and chemicals underground to split open rocks and extract gas. Advocates say it has transformed the US economy, while campaigners argue it raises huge concerns including the possibility that chemicals could spread to water supplies.

What is the legislation that has gone ahead?
The draft regulations approved yesterday allow fracking to take place 1,200 metres below national parks, areas of outstanding natural beauty and world heritage sites. Drilling to access these areas would still have to take place from outside the protected zones. The draft legislation was approved this afternoon by 298 votes to 261, with a majority of 37.

Why has it caused so much outrage?
The timing of the decision has been particularly controversial, coming, as it does, just days after the Paris climate change agreement and in the aftermath of the general election. During a Commons vote in January, MPs overwhelmingly rejected an outright ban on fracking, although ministers pledged to prevent fracking in national parks. That has led to accusations of a U-turn. Campaigners such as Friends of the Earth say the rules put drinking water and national parks at risk, while shadow energy secretary Lisa Nandy accused the government of sneaking the rules through without proper parliamentary debate, labelling it "frankly shabby".

What does the government say?
David Cameron has repeatedly expressed support for fracking, stressing its economic benefits and saying it could create tens of thousands of jobs. "I want us to get on board this change that is doing so much good and bringing so much benefit to North America. I want us to benefit from it here as well," he has previously said.

Fracking: Britain needs exploratory drilling to assess benefits, report says

15 December

A task force investigating fracking has urged the government to allow exploratory drilling to assess exactly what benefits the UK could expect to see from tapping into underground deposits of shale gas.

Prime Minister David Cameron is banking on Britain's shale gas deposits to reduce reliance on imported fuels, as well as to give tax revenues a boost.

It is also thought that the development of the fracking industry could attract billions of pounds of investment and create as many as 74,000 jobs, according to a 2013 report by the Institute of Directors.

However, a task force examining the pros and cons of fracking in the UK has cautioned today that not enough is known about the exact amount of shale gas hidden beneath the ground, reports Reuters.

"We know roughly where there are shale rocks and where there is likely to be shale gas but exactly how much is genuinely recoverable no one knows at the moment," said Lord Chris Smith, the former Environment Agency chief who is leading Task Force on Shale Gas.

He added: "Only when we have a better understanding… will the public be able to make an informed decision as to whether they support it."

The report released by the group recommends that the government allows companies to start fracking on an exploratory basis.

The controversial technique involves fracturing underground rocks with a high-pressure jet of water, sand and chemicals to release the shale gas within.

Anti-fracking campaigners claim that the procedure has been linked to polluted water supplies and an increased risk of earthquakes, and argue that the government should invest in clean, renewable energy instead.

Although the task force is funded by energy companies, it claims to be an independent body, with Lord Smith telling The Guardian last year that he is "absolutely certain" of its impartiality.

Elsewhere in its report, the Task Force on Shale Gas stated that, if safety procedures were followed correctly, shale gas extraction would pose no significant health risk, although it acknowledged the possibility of a brief dip in house prices in affected areas.

Anti-fracking campaigners ridiculed over 'cancer' claims

20 October

Campaigners have been mocked for claiming the sand used in fracking could cause cancer.

Environmental group Friends of the Earth has circulated thousands of leaflets claiming that fracking would expose neighbourhoods to chemicals that could cause cancer because it involved "pumping millions of litres of water containing a toxic cocktail of chemicals deep underground . . . [which] could end up in your drinking water".

However, Paul Younger, a professor of energy engineering at the University of Glasgow, told The Times that the claims were ridiculous. "Sand is silica, it's exactly the same stuff that's on every sandy beach in the country," said Younger.

He went on: "What are they proposing? That we treat all beaches as contaminated land and pave them over? The debate about fracking should be on the basis of reason, not wild, unsubstantiated allegations."

Also pouring scorn on the group's cancer claim is Clive Mitchell, an industrial minerals specialist at the British Geological Survey, whose work  was cited by Friends of the Earth to support its allegation. "It's tantamount to scaremongering. It's inaccurate and misleading," he said.

A less surprising opponent of the cancer link is the fracking firm Cuadrilla. The company said that it was planning to make complaints about the "wilfully misleading" leaflet to the Charity Commission, Advertising Standards Authority and the Fundraising Standards Board.

This is not the first time that fracking has been linked to serious illness. In 2013, a study claimed that chemicals used in the process could cause infertility, cancer and birth defects.

Fracking: campaigners promise 'hundreds of battles' as new licences granted

19 August

Widespread drilling for shale gas using controversial hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, techniques could be about to begin, after the government issues 27 exploration licences covering large areas of northern England and the Midlands.

But the granting of exclusive drilling rights for the 100 square km "blocks of land", which the BBC says were handed to 12 companies including Cuadrilla and Ineos, is the beginning rather than the end of a process which environmental campaigners have pledged will result in "hundreds of battles" waged to protect countryside and prevent a new wave of investment in fossil fuels.

The licences give each company the sole right to explore for shale gas in the area covered, but planning permission still needs to be granted by local councils for each well site. After Lancashire Country Council refused applications from Cuadrilla for two sites, including one which country planning officials had recommend get the go ahead, ministers announced last week that they will strip councils of decision-making powers where they are seen as unnecessarily "obstructive".

Greenpeace campaigner Daisy Sands said the award of the licences was "the starting gun to the fight for the future of our countryside". She added "hundreds of battles will spring up to defend our rural landscapes from the pollution, noise and drilling rigs that come with fracking".

Other campaigners also pointed to the lack of any southern areas in this first wave of licences, suggesting the Tories were avoiding upsetting voters in their traditional heartlands. "But the north isn't desolate and… if the Government thinks it can simply impose fracking on the north to avoid upsetting the southern shires, then it will have to think again," Friends of the Earth head of campaigns Andrew Pendleton told The Independent.

A second wave of licences for 132 land blocks in which there are greater environmental sensitivities is currently the subject of consultation. This includes about 30 for sites in the south "mostly around Bournemouth, Weymouth, Bath, Bristol and Hereford".

Lord Bourne, the energy minister, told the Daily Telegraph: "It's important we press on and get shale moving, while maintaining strong environmental controls. Investment in shale could reach £33bn and support 64,000 jobs… whilst providing a cost-efficient bridge to lower-carbon energy use."

Fast-track fracking: Tories accused of 'anti-democratic' move

13 August

Councils which "repeatedly fail" to process fracking applications within 16 weeks could lose the right to decide whether drilling for shale gas can go ahead in their areas, the government has said.

Under new guidance issued today by the Department for Energy and Climate Change and first revealed at the weekend by The Sunday Times, the Communities Secretary will be given powers to step in where councils are deemed to be being obstructive. The Planning Inspectorate has also been told to "prioritise" appeals and call-ins to "fast-track" hydraulic fracturing – or fracking.

Energy secretary Amber Rudd and communities secretary Gregg Clark insist that the new powers will continue to "ensure local people have a strong say" in fracking decisions while making sure "communities and the industry benefit from a swift process". They add "strong safety and environmental safeguards" will remain in place and stress economic benefits for local communities, with a consultation on a sovereign wealth fund to manage and invest proceeds to be published later this year.

But they immediately faced a barrage of criticism that the new process is "anti-democratic".

Speaking to The Guardian, Marcus Johnstone, Labour cabinet member at Lancashire county council, which rejected two fracking applications from Cuadrilla earlier this year after a year-long delay, said: "I can see what the direction of travel is: it's to remove local determinism, and the right of local people to have a say."

He said that his committee had extended deadlines only in order to get more information. The government's new rules will allow such delays in future, but only where "applicants agree to a longer period" for consideration.

Naomi Luhde-Thompson, Friends of the Earth's planning adviser, said: "Local authorities have been following the rules. These changes are being made because the Government doesn't agree with the democratic decisions councils have been making."

Industry representatives, however, welcomed a move they say will help bolster the UK's energy security in the future.

Ken Cronin, chief executive of UK Onshore Oil and Gas, the industry body, told the BBC: "Experience has shown that the planning process is unwieldy and the time taken for planning decisions has soared from three months to over a year… It is right that the government is acting to ensure that local people can have their say and that the highest standards of safety and environmental protection are met, but also ensuring that the planning process itself is fit for purpose."

Fracking: councils told to fast-track decisions

10 August

Councils have been warned they must meet targets to fast-track 'fracking' applications through the planning system or face decisions being taken out of their hands.

The Sunday Times reports the Department of Energy & Climate Change (DECC) will be writing to local authorities this week to demand applications are processed quicker and issue new guidance giving ministers greater power to "step in… if planners are perceived to be obstructive".

Writing in the paper, energy secretary Amber Rudd says the country "can’t continue with a system in which applications are dragged out for months or even years on end" and that "could spell the end of a potentially vital national industry".

Local councils seldom meet a target to process "environmentally sensitive" applications within 16 weeks and have proved hostile to fracking amid widespread opposition. In a recent victory for campaigners and a blow to the Government, Lancashire County Council rejected two applications to drill wells from Cuadrilla. An appeal is expected which could drag the case on for up to two further years.

The Times says the intervention comes as the DECC is preparing to issue a first wave of licences following an auction last year, which will grant exclusive rights to explore for gas in a number of less controversial areas across the UK.

A second wave relating to regions close to national parks or areas of outstanding natural beauty will come later this year. Once licences have been granted, planning permission is still required from local authorities for specific sites.

Rudd said the UK needed to pursue shale energy to help ease the transition to renewable energy and ensure energy security, adding local communities would benefit from a deal that will see operators pay councils £100,000 for each well site plus one per cent of production revenue, equivalent to £5m to £10m a year. Councils will also keep all revenue raised from business rates.

But environmental campaigners continue to oppose a practice they say can damage water supplies and harm wildlife. Greenpeace’s Daisy Sands told the Daily Mirror: "The same government that has just given more powers to local councils to oppose wind farms, the cheapest source of clean energy, is about to strip them of their right to say no to risky and polluting fracking."

Fracking roll-out in UK faces 16-month delay

31 July

Plans to roll out fracking across Britain face possible delays of up to two years because of a surprise decision by Lancashire County Council.

The local authority has rejected planning applications from the shale gas company Cuadrilla to drill eight wells at two sites on the Fylde coastal plain.

Councillors ruled exploratory drilling would have an unacceptable visual impact and create too much noise.

Cuadrilla has appealed but the process may take up to 16 months to resolve and the Government fears similar companies are unlikely to submit further applications until the Lancashire appeal is concluded, reports The Independent.

"It is incredibly frustrating," a Government source told the newspaper. "Cuadrilla has already spent millions on the process, and will now have to spend millions more on the appeal.

"But the real problem is that until the industry knows what the outcome is in Lancashire, there is going to be a real reluctance to invest in other areas."

The development was not entirely unexpected in Whitehall circles. A letter leaked to The Guardian shows that in November 2014 Chancellor George Osborne asked ministers in the Department of Energy and Climate Change, and the Department for Communities and Local Government, to prepare for the possibility Lancashire might turn down Cuadrilla's application.

Environmental campaigners say the Lancashire delay will be used to galvanise further support against fracking, which they believe is dangerous.

Last month a report from the industry-funded UK shale gas taskforce concluded it was too early to say whether fracking was good for the UK. 

Fracking: censored report highlights house price threat

2 July

The full text of a heavily redacted government report, published after a long Freedom of Information battle, has set out several risks associated with 'fracking'. These include the suggestion that house prices in affected areas could fall by up to 7 per cent.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) released the report late on Wednesday following a ruling from the Information Commissioner's Office. According to The Times a version of the study had been published last year with more than 60 sections redacted.

The Guardian points to evidence in the report based on experiences in Texas that homeowners in UK regions within a mile of a well could see the price of their house fall by up to 7 per cent. Those within five miles could also face additional insurance costs due to the heightened risk of damage related to explosions or tremors.

More speculative findings suggest that waste fluid leakage could pollute water supplies and contaminate agricultural products. BBC News Online highlights a separate section that states there could be an indirect increase in greenhouse gas emissions related to fracking.

The Government is a keen advocate of expanding fracking as it hopes to replicate an energy boom experienced in the US. The report highlights figures from the Department for Energy and Climate Change and Institute of Directors that claim fracking could bring investment of £3.7bn to the UK and create between 16,000 and 74,000 jobs.

Defra sought to pour water on the negative findings, stating in a 'covering note' that the report simply gathers together information from other published sources, is incomplete and contains "no new evidence". A spokesperson told Sky News that "many of the conclusions amount to unsubstantiated conjecture".

Earlier this week New York State firmed up its ban on fracking activities, while in California new rules were introduced requiring greater monitoring of the effects of offshore drilling on water supplies. This, though, did not prevent the state from issuing nine new drilling permits last month.

Sign up for our daily newsletter

News Feed

Disqus - noscript

David in Fracking Land. Mr. Cameron must be careful he doesn’t fall down the rabbit hole as Alice in Lewis Carroll’s (Charles Lutwidge Dodgson) adventures.

Oh here we go again! A foreign company is allowed to do "inward investment" which means that they own the profits, which go out of the UK to France, and our population become employees rather than business owners...when is this and other government going to learn that compaies like Total and all the others only make "generous inward investments" when thye can see the chance to make shedloads of profit and siphon it out to their mothership (in this case France)?
Why are we, as a country, not able to do the work ourselves, own the investment, own the profits and stick two fingers up to foreign companies?....and before SandyShore starts wagging his finger and tut-tutting, Yes I am being xenophobic, if being xenophobic is protecting our national resources and wealth for our county and people, not handing them out to "overseas interests"....and if you don't like it: Tough!

". The government says these projects will support 74,000 jobs and reduce energy bills"

Double counting. The value of any activity lies in its output (gas that reduces energy costs). The inputs (jobs) are just a means (a cost) to that end.

How clever of you to guess I would read your post. Pity you can't direct your mental acuity to useful purpose.

Good grief, Mr Sure, I don't know why you are always disparaging my comments; from what you say on many subjects, we share a healthy cynicism regarding the Government and all other powers that be, so why so vitriolic?

By Fracking energy prices according to the IEA would fall
for American companies and Europe experience a wave of migration of energy-intensive industry. So far, nothing has occurred of all this. And how it looks, it will not happen. Because there are increasing signs that the fracking
boom was unrestrained and artificially overestimated extrapolated and is a fairy tale. Many reasons contribute to such first energy company’s do not want erosion into their monopoly, secondly it is an environmental gamble. Mr. Cameron should stop before he wastes a lot of money. Plot project evaluation from production to use should be made.