Prevent: is it failing to stop terrorism?
Long-awaited review says counter-terrorism programme needs greater focus on Islamist terrorism
“Born out of the 7/7 bombings in London that killed 52 people, the Prevent programme is one of the pillars of the Government’s counterterrorism strategy,” said The Times.
It works on the idea that “prevention is better than cure”: if potential terrorists can be spotted early, by teachers and social workers, they can be “educated away” from violence. “That is the theory.”
In practice, according to William Shawcross, author of a long-awaited review published last week, things “can be worryingly different”. Shawcross believes that Prevent must focus on its core remit, particularly on Islamist terrorism.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In recent years, he suggests, it has paid too much attention to far-right radicalism, which, while a problem, “poses a much less potent threat to life and limb”. There is a reluctance among some to identify potential Islamist terrorists, “for fear of being labelled racist”. Meanwhile, people voicing populist right-wing sentiments “too often end up being referred despite harbouring no violent intent”.
A ‘controversial’ strategy
Prevent is “naturally controversial”, said Brendan Cox in The Independent. Because it involves acting before a crime is committed, it is often caricatured as a kind of “thought police”. Yet it’s a voluntary programme – you have to agree to be referred – so it needs public support. And a perception that it is biased against Muslims “has plagued it since its inception”.
A thorough review would have been a very good thing. Sadly, the choice of Shawcross was unfortunate. In 2012, he described “Europe and Islam” as “one of the most terrifying problems of our future”; he has also defended the use of waterboarding at Guantánamo Bay. This made it almost impossible for his review to “hold credibility”.
‘Failing to prevent’
Even so, Shawcross is right, said Rod Liddle in The Sunday Times. Prevent is failing. “Of the 13 terrorist attacks on our shores in the past six years, seven were carried out by people who had previously been referred to Prevent.” Some groups it has funded have advocated Islamist extremism. It’s also focusing on the wrong people: only 22% of its referrals are of Islamists, compared with 80% of active investigations by counter-terrorist police.
It’s true that Prevent doesn’t work, said Kenan Malik in The Observer. It “too often fails to prevent that which should be prevented while attempting to prevent that which should be permissible”. For instance, it regards support for Palestine as a potential “warning light”, and it draws universities and schools into its intrusive system of surveillance. It’s not a review we need: it’s a “complete reassessment of counter-terror strategy”.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Today's political cartoons - March 16, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - pointed commentary, Haiti in trouble, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 hilarious cartoons about the RNC's MAGA takeover
Cartoons Artists take on RNC funding, Lara Trump, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Trump's presidential run: a bad bet for Republicans?
Talking Point The GOP is taking a 'big gamble' on former president's 2024 White House bid
By The Week UK Published
-
The Red Army Faction: German fugitive arrested after decades on run
Why Everyone's Talking About Police reward and TV appeal leads to capture of Daniela Klette, now 65
By The Week UK Published
-
The Clapham attack: a 'wake-up call'?
Talking Point The shocking case may prove the British asylum system is broken but it has also been exploited for political purposes
By The Week UK Published
-
Nottingham attacks: was justice served?
Talking Point Mother of victim says she was 'foolish to trust legal system' as killer Valdo Calocane is sent to high-security hospital
By The Week UK Published
-
Bronson Battersby: a toddler's tragic death
Talking Point The two-year-old died of starvation when he was left alone following his father's fatal heart attack
By The Week UK Published
-
The Epstein papers: what do they reveal?
Talking Point Documents adding new detail to existing claims cause 'new furore'
By The Week UK Published
-
Epstein files released: Prince Andrew back in the spotlight
Talking Point Duke of York named in nearly 1,000 pages of newly released court files
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Rape in the metaverse: a case for the real-life police?
Talking Point Investigation launched into attack on girl in virtual reality game amid warnings that sexual offences 'rife' in online worlds
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Death in rural France: a murder that inflamed a nation
Under the radar
By The Week UK Published