Dan Brown sales ‘off target’

Dan Brown

The campaign against the ‘Da Vinci Code’ author’s horrible prose is up-hotting

BY Jack Bremer LAST UPDATED AT 09:24 ON Mon 21 Sep 2009

Two more British authors have joined the throng of writers and critics castigating Dan Brown - the man behind The Da Vinci Code - for his dreadful writing style. Unafriad of 'sour grapes' accusations, Philip Pullman and William Sutcliffe have stepped in as news reaches The First Post that sales in Britain of Brown's much-hyped new thriller, The Lost Symbol, have not been as high as forecast.

Philip Pullman, bestselling author of the trilogy His Dark Materials, attacked Brown for his "flat, stunted and ugly" prose. Pullman went on: "His basic ignorance about the way people behave is astonishing, talking in utterly implausible ways to one another."

Brown's unrealistic dialogue was picked up by Sutcliffe, reviewing The Lost Symbol for the Financial Times. "Brown finds his true nadir in dialogue," said Sutcliffe, before quoting this extract from the new book:

"'Peter', she said, 'you already told me that the Egyptians understood levers and pulleys long before Newton, and that the early alchemists did work on a par with modern chemistry, but so what? Today's physics deals with concepts that would have been unimaginable to the ancients.'"

Both men acknowledge Brown's ability to crank up an exciting plot. But on the question of whether the readers deserve to be hit over the head with such leaden prose, they appear to be divided.

Pullman, who by chance is published by Random House, the publishing conglomerate which owns Brown's publishers Transworld, said: "There's nothing wrong in writing as he does, but it is not great writing."

Sutcliffe, whose last novel, Whatever Makes You Happy, was published by Bloomsbury, said: "People buy his novels because they are gripping". As a result, plausibility was not perhaps a concern.

However, he attacked Brown for talking down to his readers. "Dan Brown assumes his readers know nothing," he wrote in the FT. "He refers not to the Parthenon but to 'Athens¹ ancient Parthenon', in case you don't know where it is or whether it is old or new."

Criticism of Dan Brown's prose looks destined to run for as long as the printing presses keep rolling - i.e. quite a long time. The first print run for The Lost Symbol was a staggering 6.5 million. But if it reaches the heights of The Da Vinci Code, then ten times that number will need to be churned out worldwide.

However, The First Post has learned from senior sources within the publishing industry that despite special window displays and advance sales promotions in book stores across the country, sales of The Lost Symbol have not hit the publisher's targets. Any further, more concrete, evidence of a Dan Brown sales slump will be gratefully received at First Post Towers. · 

Comments

The sneering is hilarious and pathetic, but desperately predictable. Yes Brown is not the greatest writer ever, but then again I can name several "hit" British writers who can't write for toffee either like Archer. However, Brown knows how to weave a good tale. This is not literature its just a good yarn to enjoy. I am reading it now and quite enjoying it.

Its the recession people...Dan Brown's books are always great. They get people to wake up to what exactly is religion. I have bought this book and will get to it as soon as I can. At least it is under my roof.

In view of economic times, the cost of books has gone astronomical. Paperbacks are up to $9.95 in the states, and if they are 4.99 at Tesco's at the exchange rate that is a bargain. I think books need to come down in price. Or perhaps people need to start going to their libraries again. I borrow books too.

Dan Brown is a great writer, I won't let the media tell me what to think, or read any negative comments. People have their own minds, and do not need to be controled by media telling them what to think of anything. Non-biased reporting is a thing of the past!!

I think The Lost Symbol's lack of sales in the UK and other European nations is due several factors including global recession. One possibility is it's decidedly American backdrop as here in the US the books sales have reached record breaking proportions. Another may be it's subject matter, dealing with Freemasonry rather than religious material as in The DaVinci Code. Controversy and hype, deserved or not, can do much for any novelist. Art is subjective and I enjoy a mindless read now and again. On the other hand I would recommend for those seeking thought provoking and engaging material to pick up something from Richard Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens.

I'm not sure that I understand all the literary snobbery over Dan Brown's books. My personal view is that he's a terrible novelist but he's not the only one out there. I can think of quite a few writers that I can't stand who've won all sorts of presumably prestigious awards. Is Brown vilified because he's so bad yet so successful?

Surely if sales are slow, the chances of it being due to the nation suddenly finding a hitherto unsuspected reservoir of good taste are remote. I think it's more likely due to being in a global recession, and fewer people being willing to pay over the odds for the hardback of a novel. I enjoy Dan Brown's novels for the escapist nonsense they are, and I'm looking forward to the new one. But I will probably buy it in paperback for 4.99 at Tesco, just like I bought the other three.

Comments are now closed on this article