Ken Loach and Jane Fonda made to ‘look foolish’ by Venice best film winner

Eric Cantona and Ken Loach

Israeli anti-war film ‘Lebanon’ wins Golden Lion in Venice while Loach and Fonda demand a boycott of Tel Aviv films in Toronto

BY Jack Bremer LAST UPDATED AT 08:41 ON Mon 14 Sep 2009

The Toronto film festival, which opened at the end of last week, overlapping with Venice, has been hit by a censorship storm concerning its decision to choose Tel Aviv for its inaugural 'city spotlight' section. A line-up of well-known protestors - including Jane Fonda, Ken Loach and Noam Chomsky - has backed a call by a little-known Canadian documentary maker John Greyson to boycott the Tel Aviv films.

Greyson said this was "not the year" to celebrate 'Brand Israel' in the light of the invasion of Gaza and the continued expansion of illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land. As a result, Fonda, Loach, Chomsky and others signed a joint letter titled 'The Toronto Declaration - No Celebration of Occupation'. It claimed that the festival "whether intentionally or not, has become complicit in the Israeli propaganda machine".

However, their protest has been thrown into sharp relief by the fact that an Israeli film, Lebanon (above), won Venice's Golden Lion for best film at the weekend. Moreover, it is a film that could never be called propaganda. Set almost entirely inside an Israeli tank at the start of the 1982 Lebanon War, it carries a powerful anti-war message.

Its director, Samuel Maoz, who based his script on his own traumatic experience as a tank gunner during that war, said there were powerful voices in Israel who had been opposed to his film competing at Venice. He added: "I suppose ever filmmaker has the naïve, even pathetic dream that his film could be the one that finally stops a war."

A Hollywood producer attending Toronto told The First Post last night: "The Golden Lion for Lebanon has made Fonda and co look foolish. I admire Ken Loach as a film-maker but there are a lot of people here who wish he'd stop using these events to score cheap political points."

He was referring to the fact that Loach tried to force boycotts at both the Melbourne and Edinburgh film festivals this summer. In Melbourne he withdrew his film Looking for Eric when he discovered the festival was part-sponsored by Israel. In Edinburgh he led a campaign to force festival organisers to return a £300 grant from the Israeli Embassy designed to pay for a young Tel Aviv filmmaker, Tali Shalom Ezer, to travel to Scotland for the screening of her film, Surrogate.

Prominent American and Canadian Jews had already reacted angrily to the Fonda-Loach Toronto boycott before the news of Lebanon's victory in Venice came through on Saturday night.

Marvin Hier, founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, said: "Tel Aviv is one of the freest cities in the world, warts and all: a model city of diversity, freedom of expression and tolerance, for Arabs and Jews. It is the height of hypocrisy to single out Tel Aviv."

The veteran Canadian director Ivan Reitman, who made the mega-hit Ghostbusters, said: "Film is about exploring the complexities and contradictions of the human condition. Any attempt to silence that conversation, to hijack the festival for any political agenda in the end, only serves to silence artistic voices."

Samuel Moaz, director of Lebanon, asked by the Observer to comment on the Toronto boycott, said: "The point of a film like mine is to open a dialogue, to get people talking to each other about important issues. It makes no sense to boycott art. Maybe I wouldn't have won if Jane Fonda was on the jury, but she wasn't." · 

Comments

Michael Jose, Israel is a cruel and blood thirsty nation, which deserves to be boycotted, just like South Africa was. 'Oasis of freedom'? Are you blind? Israel currently operates the world's largest concentration camp, where it enforces systematic brutality and racial discrimination. It continues to rob the property, liberty and lives of a people who were there before them. Worse of all, it has waged war on a civilian population especially children.

The simple truth is that despite the huge propaganda machine that the Israeli lobby network have operated over the past 40 years, Israel's crimes have become too ugly to ignore, the world is rightly disgusted with them.

Hence there has been a massive PR effort from the Israel to counter the world's disgust with them. Money is being poured into slick ad campaigns and into films as well. Therefore, the overall sentiment to boycott Israel is absolutely correct and necessary.

Loach and Fonda were not made to look foolish in any way.

Their objections were not against Israeli film makers per se, but about the selection of Tel Aviv as part of the 'city spotlight'.

As for the "Hollywood producer" who remains anonymous, his comments thus look little more than a smear.

John Greyson is NOT little-known, he is a university professor who work such as Patient Zero and Lilies has been critically acclaimed. In withdrawing his entry to the TIFF, he specifically states that it is NOT "against the film or filmmakers" from Israel!

Ken Loach and co have lost the plot. Loach should stick to what he's good at, making films that make political statements. Jane Fonda should have learned her lesson after the Vietnam war. She's just an actress who makes money doing adverts for a big multinational cosmetics firms these days. Who cares what she says? She's clearly sold out.
The only way to mix art and politics is by artistic means, not by jumping on a soapbox and trying to deny other people their artistic freedom.

God bless the Israelis I say, an oasis of freedom, fruitfulness, and righteousness in a desert full of seething cut-throat barbarians.

Comments are now closed on this article