Hypocrisy surrounds Rev Jones’ bonfire of Korans

Alexander Cockburn: Clinton, Petraeus, Lieberman... every one a hypocrite in their denunciation of Rev Jones

Column LAST UPDATED AT 12:29 ON Thu 9 Sep 2010
Alexander Cockburn

By now the air is so thick with pieties about the need for tolerance and respect for all creeds that one yearns for the Rev Terry Jones, mutton-chop whiskers akimbo, to toss those Korans in the burn barrels outside his Gainesville church in Florida and torch them on 9/11.

The entire world court of enlightened opinion is bearing down on this former hotel manager, now senior pastor at the Dove World Outreach Center and its modest congregation, which does – on the evidence of videos of the church's proceedings - boast some young female members of whom many a beleaguered Anglican parish would be only too proud to have raising their arms in ecstasy during Sunday matins as the collection plate passes from hand to hand.

Take Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State. "It's regrettable that a pastor in Gainesville, Florida, with a church of no more than 50 people, can make this outrageous and distressful, disgraceful plan and get, you know, the world's attention," she said in a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations. "It doesn't in any way represent America or Americans or American government or American religious or political leadership."
 
This is the same Hillary Clinton who has spent much of her term as helmswoman of the nation's foreign affairs demonising Iran and threatening it with nuclear obliteration, during which uncounted millions of Korans and the people clutching  them would turn to cinders.
 
And here's US Senator Joe Lieberman imploring Jones to think again. "I appeal to people who are planning to burn the Koran to reconsider and drop their plans because they are inconsistent with American values and, as General Petraeus has warned, threatening to America's military."
 
This is the same Lieberman who is the most sedulous US lobbyist for the interests of Israel in Washington DC. Has Lieberman warned Israel that its planned law to force every Palestinian to swear explicit allegiance to the Jewish state, hence the tenets of Zionism, is inconsistent with American values, and thus prompts him to reconsider his approval of America's annual disbursement of $3 billion to Israel's collection plate?
 
US Attorney General Eric Holder has called Jones's plan "idiotic and dangerous". Would Holder call the action of his Democratic predecessor as Attorney General, Janet Reno, in ordering the  federal onslaught that led to the incineration in 1993 of the Branch Davidian church in Waco, "idiotic and dangerous"?

The Justice Department has always defended Reno's action, even though it prompted the blowing up of the Murrah Center in Oklahoma City, which until the 9/11 attacks was the most deadly act of terror perpetrated on American soil.
 
And here's General Petraeus making what is described as an unusual - for a member of the military – intervention. "Images of the burning of a Koran would undoubtedly be used by extremists in Afghanistan - and around the world - to inflame public opinion and incite violence,"  he said.

Petraeus can only advise Pastor Jones, who has the constitutional freedom to dispose of the Koran as he thinks fit, consonant with local laws pertaining to public bonfires. He can, however, suspend by a simple order the lethal Predator onslaughts that regularly decimate civilian groups in Afghanistan and the Pakistan border region, inflaming public opinion and leading invariably to an escalation in violence.
 
For their part, Afghans are already demonstrating in Kabul in anticipatory protest at Pastor Jones's plan. They denounce disrespect for the Holy Koran. But we also learn from earnest proponents of religious tolerance and inter-confessonal amity that the Koran promotes respect for the Bible (though not of course the claim of  the divinity of Christ – a view also held by followers of Judaism).

What did the indignant Afghans say when, in early August of this year, 10 members of a Christian medical team — six Americans, two Afghans, one German and a Briton, three women among them — were gunned down by the Taliban who claimed they were trying to convert Muslims to Christianity. The gunmen spared an Afghan driver, who screamed he was a Muslim and babbled some verses from the Koran.

The group were members of the International Assistance Mission, one of the longest serving non-governmental organisations operating in Afghanistan, registered as a non-profit Christian organisation, apparently not proselytising. So what if they were?
 
Jones is animated by religious principle, salted by the opportunism with which every effective evangelist for a faith is endowed as a part of the armory of conversion. He's aroused the fury of the American establishment which has as a matter of regular imperial maintenance promoted the murder of millions across the world in the name of "American values".  

Modern Christians, fusionists of the let's-all-get-along school, deplore him too. Many Evangelicals think Jones is on track, though they mostly won't say so publicly. As a Southern Baptist said to me this morning, "Alex, they say that Christianity is tolerant. But Christ drove the money changers from the Temple. He didn't tolerate them. A line has to be drawn, just like Jones is doing."
 
What better symbol than Jones of what should have been America's overall resilience in the aftermath of the Muslim attacks of 9/11/2001: an assertion of the greatest of American values, as embodied in constitutional provisions for free speech? These freedoms matter most when they are under duress. Amid the duress after 9/11, the Constitution was trashed by the leaders who now decry Jones.

If Pastor Jones does go ahead, and ignites the burn barrels outside his church, I only hope that on the other side of the road or on some piece of property volunteered by the mayor of Gainesville - a gay man who is stupidly denouncing Jones - there will be other barrels, into which will be tossed by their opponents the Bible, and kindred sacred texts, plus Bacon's Advancement of Learning, Feuerbach's onslaught on Christianity and Das Kapital.

Fahrenheit 451 is the temperature of the crucible  in which ideas and principles survive or die. · 

Comments

The fact that one too many hypocritical politicians decry the Koran burn out, does not mean that they are wrong. It seems to me that Mr. Alexander Cockburn defends this stupid pastor from Florida because he is just like him, probing whatever means to get publicity on himself. America made lots of mistakes after 9-11 as the author reminds us all, we had a lot of stupid politicians in power then and we had lots of economic interests behind that stupidity. We have to turn the page and try not to be so stupid again. There is a minuscule power left to all of us who can write articles and make comments on the media, let's use it to wise up ourselves as a society, not to play the "fuck-you-all" rebellious card. It's just stupid.

I look at Jones's face, and the word "neanderthal" just leaps out at me. This is the kind of warmongering loony who began the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, and who keeps them going with his pig-ignorant stupidity and hatred. Dumbsfeld, Wolfy, Bushy, & Cheney - all part of the same subhuman mindset.

I would say that this piece is less bigoted, than simply an example of lazy journalism. Itâ??s as if Mr Cockburn has either been given a commission for, or has simply cooked up a disconnected and deliberately provocative viewpoint in order to fill column inches. The stance that various figures in the US administration are in some way equally culpable as Jones is at best disingenuous, as I assume that these individuals did not set out to cause injury, death or outrage whatever the actual outcome of their actions.

Many Muslims around the world find it difficult to understand why the US administration would permit the intended burning of their holy book, and assume that many in the West support this despicable action. Perhaps a better comparison would have been with the death sentence recently passed on an Iranian woman for alleged adultery after the death of her husband, something I believe most westerners find incomprehensible and barbaric.

Few in the west support the ill informed lunacy of the Reverend Jones, and Iâ??d be willing to bet that very few Muslims would support the proposed execution in Iran. If this comparison works at all, it might just be to illustrate that no nation, or religion, has a monopoly on dangerous extremists, who do not reflect the views of ordinary folk be they Muslim, Christian or of any other belief.

I agree with Nota Bene. This article is missing the point. What I donâ??t understand is the media giving this person of no particular importance the oxygen he clearly craves. NATO Soldiers, who shouldn't be there anyway, propping up an awful regime no better than the Taliban themselves (and civilians) will die in countries like Afghanistan (as is usual when these protests get out of hand), all because he is venting some ignorant opinion. The monsters who murdered all those people in New York were brainwashed using a perverted version of Islam and have been justified by fanatics using passages that are not even in the Koran. Thatâ??s a bit like taking marriage advice from St Paul.
The burning or burying (recycling is also permitted) of holy books (like the Torah and even the Bible) is the suggested way of disposing of them... although I grant you the intent is clearly to insult. Whatever your faith (or none) this is a fundamentally unchristian thing to do.

I agree with the first comment. Truly a ridiculous,and I'll add bigoted and thoughtless article. I'm not sure what the point is??!?
Equally bigoted and thoughtless is the second comment, although I've read Mr. McGranes drivel before and am not surprised.By the by there Kevy boy, Issa, peace be upon him,whose name your innovated religion calls Jesus for some inexplicable reason, also said "blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God"
There are 2 acceptable ways of disposing of the Qur'an. burying and burning. Much better for them to be burned then to be in the hands of those who might disrespect them.
I will try to pray for this lost soul and hope that one day he actually reads an english translation of the qur'an for himself rather then relying on the internet hate sites he apparently refers to.

But you sound like you are blaming Islam for the 9/11, NOT terrorists? Those were mere terrorists not Religion. We have to draw the line between extremism and religious. Although am not muslim, but I know there is nowhere in the Qouran that states that, "you have to kill all non-muslims. or forceably convert every-one to Islam. so why burn the book. The book has nothing to do with this terrorism.

Wouldn't it be excellent if, as this twerp burns the Holy Qu'ran, a massive brown foot comes out of the sky and squashes this waster into the ground!

Yes, Jesus overturned the money changers, but that was against corruption within his own religion. A far more appropriate example from the Bible, with apostolic approval, was the very public burning of pagan books by Christians in Ephesus (Acts 19): they "brought their books together, and burned them before all men: and they counted the price of them, and found it fifty thousand pieces of silver". Not some token bonfire then, but a real conflagration. What's more, General Petraeus should consider the incongruity of his statements: his armed forces are supporting an Islamic state that punishes conversion from Islam to Christianity with the death sentence - that's not just the law of the Taliban, that's the policy of Karzai's government. Our boys are dying to prop up this government, which inflicts ultimate violence on those who want to get out of a false religion.

What a ridiculous article. The real issue is whether the burning of the Koran will provoke further violence against westerners in Afghanistan, and elsewhere. This is simply an act which stokes the fires of hatred, and has no beneficial impact. And this on the day that the Reverend Ian Paisley speaks out against the Pope visiting the UK.

Comments are now closed on this article