Loose-lips McChrystal does Obama a huge favour
Alexander Cockburn: With Petraeus back in charge, Obama can rethink the 2011 Afghan withdrawal
Just when Barack Obama's presidency was drowning in BP's crude oil, a megalomaniacal US Army general called Stanley McChrystal, commander of the US-led coalition in Afghanistan, has done him several huge favours.
• He took the spotlight off the Gulf of Mexico.
• He gave Obama a marvelous opportunity to act the decisive Commander-in-Chief, packing his insubordinate general into retirement.
• By committing political suicide he created a vacancy for the one general the right wing can't fault Obama for putting in his place - Gen David Petraeus.
Weeks before McChrystal and his drunken retinue poured their contempt for Obama and his top Afghan advisors into the notebook of Rolling Stone reporter Michael Hastings, the writing was on the wall. A steady stream of leaks from the Pentagon registered dissatisfaction among the top Pentagon brass at the way the war in Afghanistan was going.
Last year McChrystal courted immediate dismissal by publicly daring Obama to deny him the extra troops he demanded to instrument the counter-insurgency strategy he pledged would vanquish the Taliban, win over the Afghan people and allow Obama to promise liberal critics of the Afghan war he'd have the troops out by 2011.
Obama had the opportunity then to emulate Harry Truman's famous firing of World War Two hero Gen Douglas MacArthur for insubordination. But Obama blinked. He gave McChrystal almost exactly what he wanted.
The American public got the impression that McChrystal, leading the Afghan mission, but answering to Gen Petraeus, now in charge of Central Command, was going to follow the latter's famous 'surge' in Iraq. This was essentially a PR operation, aimed at declaring victory and getting the hell out. Petraeus is touted as America's only success story in that doomed venture and his national standing is high.
Afghanistan is a very different proposition. McChrystal came from five years of running the Pentagon's death squads – Joint Special Forces Command, killing or kidnapping America's enemies in the Great War on Terror. But now he was trying to introduce doctrines of counter-insurgency (COIN), formulated in the Counter-Insurgency Manual for the US Army, assembled by Petraeus.
It does not require the intellect of Sun Tzu to see that you do not win the hearts and minds of a civilian population by bombing their wedding parties, raping their daughters, torturing their sons and, where deemed necessary, reducing their villages to rubble. COIN put these simple thoughts into military language.
McChrystal duly issued stringent rules of engagement, crimping the eagerness of field officers to whistle up close air support to drop tons of high explosive on suspect neighbourhoods. These restrictions drew strident protests from his forces, as endangering their lives. McChrystal said there was no other option. But then came McChrystal's showcase operation in Marjah earlier this year, designed to drive the Taliban out of this rural district.
As the high command back in the Pentagon studied the intelligence reports they found that it hadn't been long before the Taliban, prudently absenting themselves during the Marjah offensive, were back in business. With the Pentagon background briefers whispering to the New York Times and Washington Post that the COIN strategy was misfiring badly, McChrystal put off a larger lunge into Kandahar until this autumn. The backstabbing didn't stop.
For his part, Obama has been nervously eyeing his commitment to a 2011 withdrawal. The way things were going, withdrawal would simply mean "rout", politically disastrous for Obama. To insist on an extension would land him in trouble with his liberal supporters in the run-up to a re-election bid in 2012. McChrystal and, far more subtly, Petraeus were already manoeuvring politically for a ditching of the 2011 deadline. Furthermore, there was even talk that Petraeus might soon retire from the Army and step into the race for the Republican nomination.
Then - a blessing from heaven for Obama - came the Rolling Stone story. McChrystal no doubt blames the Iceland volcano which left him stranded in Paris, staying at the awful Hotel Westminster on the Rue de la Paix, sipping Bud Lite Lime beer (is there women's silk underwear under those fatigues?) in Kitty O'Shea's, with his retinue, 'Team America', cavorting drunkenly on the dance floor and imparting to the delighted Rolling Stone reporter their utter contempt for their civilian and military superiors, expressed in language not far removed from Nicholas Anelka's halftime verbal assault on French football coach Raymond Domenech: "Va t'enculer, sale fils de pute!" ('Go fuck yourself, you dirty son of a whore.')
How could McChrystal have been so stupid? Megalomania. A senior US military commander has the powers and appurtenances of a Roman proconsul, of a Julius Caesar in Gaul. McChrystal had been successful in massaging the press with confidential briefings and seemingly total access. Talking to Rolling Stone, he probably thought this magazine deserved a more unbuttoned approach than the New York Times.
Less careful than the adroit Petraeus, he over-reached himself, possibly because he insists on sleeping only four hours a night, running seven miles at dawn and eating one meal every 24 hours. (Petraeus has the same sort of Spartan life style. Rather than pour out indiscretions to a reporter Petraeus passed out briefly in a Senate hearing two weeks ago, stating later that he'd been dehydrated.)
The White House pounced eagerly on the opportunity offered by Rolling Stone. Aside from everything else, it was a chance for the president, regarded by most Americans to have been a wimp towards BP, to act tough. Without Pentagon backing, McChrystal was a goner.
Now begins a delicate dance in what bids to be Act IV or even V in Obama's mad commitment to nail al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. Obama has staked all on Petraeus who has accepted command of a mission doomed from the get-go. The war is unpopular. Though Americans are prepared to equate the Taliban with al-Qaeda, they can't really see the point of the war. It's gone on for nine years, America's longest. Two weeks ago the Pentagon desperately refloated a very old story that Afghanistan is rich in mineral resources, like lapis lazuli and lithium.
Will success, however contrived, propel Petraeus towards the White House in 2012 or 2016? Probably not. Americans honour warriors, but they elect draft-dodgers – Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush. There's a precedent for Petraeus's fainting fit. Julius Caesar famously suffered from blackouts. He crossed the Rubicon, but he didn't survive long thereafter. ·
Comments are now closed on this article

















Comments
I preface my observations by saying that I am no great fan of the President or his predecessor. I am also no great fan of the Department of State in this or the last three adminstrations. These folks have done few of us (save the contractors and munitions makers and some others) any service whatsoever.
The McChrystal distraction has allowed the nits and naifs and axe-grinders a way to divert attention from what is going on in the world. This has allowed the screamers and whiners and pretend experts (e.g., Hanniepie, Olbermann, and the rest) to try to look like they know something when they know nothing, and allows folk who could never pass a legitimately written literacy test to vote, anyway. These are the same nits who if given a paper with the Bill of Rights typed on it would scream that it was some "Commonist" plot.
That said:
I wonder how many of those who are condemning the President for replacing Gen'l McChrystal have read the Rolling Stone piece.
I wonder how many of those who are praising the President for replacing Gen'l McChrystal have read the Rolling Stone piece.
I wonder how many of them can read and discern what was written and seek what went on below the surface.
And, to be snarky, I wonder how many of them read without moving their lips.
I am not much impressed and if the President got an upward bounce because of this it proves the ignorance of his supporters and that is all.
1st of all WE still know what's going on in the Gulf - Please! 2nd of all from what I hear the troops do not like obama - not one little bit and agree with McChrystal & 3rd I don't think Petraus can do any better - Iraq is still a mess - and its not getting any better and 4th I have to agree with your last line - most of people in the country should not be allowed to vote - because they don't have a clue - and can't determine a snake oil salesman when they hear one.
A great gift for the Taliban, an unexpected plate of propaganda material to be exploited. With pre-wired jaw set in clinch/angry mode and eyedrops for the steely glint all that was missing was the large lapel badge "I am not a wimp". McChrystal ambushed himself unfortunately which was a pity, we need one or two runaway generals like that to do the dirty work and remind us that civilian politicians can and do frequently screw up wars at great human cost. Doubtless he will be back sometime in another capacity where his hardnosed cavalier experience can be utilised to cut through diplomatic stagnation. Looks like we can expect major changes in policy/strategy in due course and handing Petraeus the poisoned chalice could limit his opportunities of becoming a potential presidential candidate. A deft Obama move.
I love the sardonic throw-away ending..... Cockburn at his best !
Great column Alex, back to the best. But any back-up to the 'raping their daughters' claim?