Has Obama just handed the moon to China?

Photo-montage

A decade from now, the Chinese could have a lunar military base

BY Tim Edwards LAST UPDATED AT 12:01 ON Sun 7 Feb 2010

President Barack Obama's proposal to cut the $81bn funding for Nasa's Constellation manned spaceflight programme spells the end of America's attempt to return people to the moon by 2020. If Congress approves the budget, it almost certainly means the next people to land on the moon will be Chinese. Some people are saying this is a serious strategic error.

Such a strategic withdrawal represents a remarkable turnaround for a country that as recently as 2003 warned that China's "manned space efforts almost certainly will contribute to improved military space systems in the 2010-2020 timeframe".

So claimed a US Defence Department report called 'The Military Power of the People's Republic of China', which for good measure quoted Captain Shen Zhongchang of the Chinese Navy Research Institute as saying: "The mastery of outer space will be a requisite for military victory, with outer space becoming the new commanding heights for combat."

It would be easy to argue this report was a product of its time – when a paranoid Bush administration was looking for enemies to justify its controversial missile defence shield. But if anything the threat from China has increased since then.

Richard Fisher, a senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center in Virginia, and an authority on Chinese and Asian military affairs, told The First Post: "The problem for the US and its allies is that China's space program is controlled by the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and almost every aspect is designed to produce 'dual use', or some kind of military benefit as well as non-military."

For example, the September 2008 Shenzhou-7 mission is remembered mainly for including China's first space walk, but soon after this exercise, the craft launched a 40kg microsatellite as it passed within 45km of the International Space Station. "Was this a social call, practice for future space docking, or an exercise in manned co-orbital anti-satellite interception?" asks Fisher.

In 2007 China shocked the world by becoming only the third nation to shoot down a satellite with a ground-based missile – demonstrating an ability to protect itself from spy satellites.

The US and the Soviet Union ran similar tests in the 1980s, but stopped, largely because of the menace of orbiting debris from the destroyed satellites.

The Chinese space programme gets by on around $1.3bn per year - compared to Nasa's $17.6bn - but it is already proving an embarrassment to America. With a little more of China's undoubted financial might behind it, it could deliver a lunar base some time in the 2020s.

China is adamant any such base would be open to scientists from around the world. But would the Americans be able to swallow their pride and send scientists to a Chinese moon base?

Two months after China's satellite target practice, the former chief administrator of Nasa, Michael Griffin, testified to the US Senate: "The moon is very visible and any proposition by another country to set up a permanent presence there would be unacceptable to the Americans."

More recently, the messages coming from China have been mixed. Air force commander Xu Qiliang told the People's Liberation Army Daily in November 2009: "As far as the revolution in military affairs is concerned, the competition between military forces is moving towards outer space… this is a historical inevitability and a development that cannot be turned back."

Yet around the same time, China and Russia jointly submitted a proposal to the United Nations aimed at securing "a legally-binding agreement banning the deployment of weapons in outer space".

Last month Fisher warned of China's "scary space ambitions" in an article in the Wall Street Journal Asia. He reported claims that China could develop ‘assassin' and laser-armed satellites and may already be developing an 'orbital bomber'.

Fisher told The First Post how an interview with a Russian source had alerted him to the possibility of a "long-term and sophisticated unmanned Chinese Moon base". He points out that China's current Chang'e Moon exploration program has been developed with input from Russia's Lavochkin Corporation, one of the world's experts in unmanned space technologies.

Chang'e 3, which is scheduled to land on the moon in 2013, may carry a small telescope and a laser rangefinder. "It is easy to see how this instrument package could be used to target US deep space satellites, or at some point, even to attack them," says Fisher.

Obama's "cold-blooded" ending of the US moon programme, he adds, "sadly conveys an impression of democratic power in retreat in the face of Chinese communism's advance".

In 2006, President George W Bush released a Space Policy Document. It stressed that the US must "develop capabilities, plans, and options to ensure freedom of action in space, and, if directed, deny such freedom of action to adversaries".

At the time, the report was met with general dismay as the lunatic ravings of a warmonger. The Asia Times read: "The US is turning space into its personal colony." But with China seemingly the only participants in an undeclared space race, Bush's policy looks almost reasonable. · 

Read more about

Comments

For fifty years since the moon landing every aspect of technology has developed, especially in electronics, and NASA is still firing chemical rockets invented by the Chinese thousands of years ago - old tech. I think if anything more was possible after Earth orbit and a quick, dangerous flight to the Moon, it would have been happening by now. Truth is, space flight, galactic federations, communication with aliens and star wars are all fiction, can never happen, aren't going to happen. We would be better employed trying to sort out the mess we've made of planet Earth rather than dreaming of reaching the stars. We are a smear of life on an insigficant small lump of rock in the outer reaches of a vast explosion of matter. The distances involved make any travel by us impossible, as well as the radiation in space being lethal to such a fragile skin-encapsulated ego. Once sci-fi was seen as fiction, now too many people think it's real. Stick to CGI and forget about space travel. The Chinese won't do anything more with the Moon than the Americans; leave some litter and go home.

@ Jess D is in the bulls eye with his comment -- this is indeed just paranoid poo, but it is also an attempt at scrambling for funding for a NASA that has been asleep at the switch for a while now. I'm reminded about 1990, when the USSR was about to end and the USAF discovered, it "needed" systems to shoot down asteroids that threatened the Earth. Today, I found it particularly funny to read: "But would the Americans be able to swallow their pride and send scientists to a Chinese moon base?" What is so special about Americans? They had their moment in history and royally fouled up their opportunity to make this a better world. Now it's time to step aside, a prudent and necessary decision for a totally bankrupt nation, ... not just financially, but morally as well. Tim Edwards, the author of the drivel-piece, need not worry about 2020 -- by that time the US will have degenerated into a third-world nation (its infrastructure is already there, the corruption in Congress points that way, too). So why worry? Without the Americans being able to continue messing around, the world will be more peaceful, provided we now can keep the EU calmed down.

But it's all so that the next army to invade Iran will be American, right?

The trouble is that when it was just America with Space capability then the revisiting of the moon was just a 'vanity project' but when their are other countries developing this capability and one of them is a communist state then his decision won't just look silly, it is silly, he has just ceded the Moon and maybe even Mars to other countries, China, India, Japan are all able to develop powerful space technology and reach the Moon and beyond, having done so they will almost certainly claim large amounts of territory for themselves and none of them seem likely to hand any of it back.
Japan and probably China in a short timespan are or will be technology powerhouses and will not need to bargain with the USA regarding the technology to remain on the Moon, without being there the USA will not have any skillsets they will require.
RIP NASA your day is finished.

Let the Chinese have the moon. They'll have to sell any technology they develop in order to get there to fund the project in the long term.

He did the right thing. Politics isn't as important as engineering in space missions, and NASA didn't really have a suitable rocket motor, so everything else is moot. NASA only has the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME), which is re-usable and throttlable and thus complex and low on Specific Impulse, and the J-2X, which is an upgrade of the old J-2 from the Saturn V of the Apollo programme. NASA has fallen so far behind in rocket-motor technology that they have to buy Russian R-180 motors for their Atlas launchers. The mean old Russians won't share their technology with America, so the R-180s are flown in and fitted to the Atlases by Russian crews just before launch so nobody can peek. Given a situation like that the Constellation program was never going to the Moon, and I dare say that all concerned are very relieved that it has been cancelled. NASA is now free to make realistic plans and to research new ideas; the 'tri-fuel' motors which the Russians have pioneered (and keep to themselves), or plasma motors like VASIMIR. Things are actually looking good!

And why would the Chinese want a 'military base' on the Moon? For what possible purpose? The more I think about this notion, the funnier it seems.

This is just another pile of paranoid poo. And anyway, how can you have a race with only one participant?

Poor Obama: he can't win. He'd be hammered by the critics for wasting tax-dollars on a vanity project if he hadn't called a halt.

Comments are now closed on this article