9/11: when Tony Blair looked like a true leader

9/11 showed Blair to be a leader of men; the trouble was, he led them down the wrong path

Column LAST UPDATED AT 09:56 ON Sun 11 Sep 2011

"I HAVE just spoken to President Bush and this is the situation," said Tony Blair as COBRA, the British government's emergency response committee, reconvened on the morning of September 12, 2001, having been in session for much of the previous day.  I breathed a sigh of relief.  As a member of the Cabinet Office Assessments Staff, I had been one of the group detailed by our boss, John Scarlett, to prepare an intelligence briefing.

The atmosphere was not good. You could cut chunks of it out with a spoon, as PG Wodehouse once put it. It was a bad day for a bomb. Scarlett had taken over as chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee just nine days before. Murphy's Law, as ever, meant that our top terrorism expert was away on holiday.

Even the usually poker-faced SAS representatives looked worried. We were collectively the people in the country most in the know and the majority of us thought London would be under attack before the day was out ­ especially the part of London we were in, Downing Street.

COBRA, the atmospheric name for the committee, is actually an acronym for plain old Cabinet Office Briefing Room A. Curiously, it usually met in Cabinet Office Briefing Room F underneath Downing Street but that would not sound as atmospheric.

Occasionally, it transferred itself to the H Bomb-proof briefing rooms beneath the Ministry of Defence, reassuringly codenamed OPindar' after the ancient Greek poet whose house in Thebes was the only building Alexander the Great allowed to remain standing when he razed the city. We would have felt better in Pindar.

After sharing with us what George W Bush had just told him on the telephone, the prime minister moved swiftly on to issuing precise orders to the RAF for the shooting down of civilian airliners believed to have been hijacked. There had been some discussion that the military would take the decision. He made it clear that it was a decision for him alone.

Golly, Tony Blair was good. His language was precise which is important when giving orders. He communicated calm and decisiveness. It wasn't an act. He knew what to do. It was his moment.

And when he had finished issuing the key instructions, and got up to leave the room, I noticed - approvingly, as a Guards officer - that he was wearing very shiny black shoes. He adjusted his jacket on the way out in a way we have seen countless times on television. Just before the door he turned, looked round the room, nodded and left. He trusted everyone else at the meeting to get on with what needed to be done.

It was a textbook, virtuoso display of crisis leadership. Better than anything I had seen from senior army officers in my 20-year military career ­much better. It did not seem like an act and it wasn't entirely to do with his office. Gordon Brown could not have done it and I doubt the hard-bitten men and women at COBRA would be that impressed by David Cameron in a real crisis. There was something about Tony Blair that was just right.

I left the highly respected Assessments Staff six months later. It had been an extraordinary privilege to spend two-and-a-half years there. Our judgment and analytical rigour were respected across the intelligence world. We had played a key part in the UK's response to the worst terror threat for a generation. John Scarlett kindly agreed that I could wear uniform at the last meeting of the Joint Intelligence Committee I attended. It was a proud
moment for me.

Within a few months, as we now know, the whole apparatus was in the hands of Alastair Campbell.

I have often wondered about Tony Blair in the years since. How come so many people, previously of good character and judgment, went willingly along with his follies, especially in Iraq. The answer is uncomfortable. It wasn't because he was a fraud or a good actor.  It was because, as was clear to me on 9/12, he really is that rare phenomenon, a charismatic leader of men. · 

Comments

9/12, Blair made a brief statement to his party and the nation which included the words "American values are OUR values". If he truly believed that... then he seems to have transformed from a "charismatic leader of men" to a deluded idiot within less than 24 hours.

Fascinating insights; thank you. Many years ago, there was a lot of fuss about Clinton's philanderings, with lots of commentators getting on their high horse about how Clinton was abusing his power with impressionable females etc etc. Then a senior woman reporter with one of the big networks who'd been on Air Force One a lot came out and said people who've never been in the presence of Clinton don't know what they're talking about: "If he'd asked me to sleep with him, I probably would have said yes". That's what makes these kinds of insights from people (like you) in the know about people the rest of us rarely get to encounter are really fascinating.

1,500 architects and engineers including demolition experts affirm that the 911 buildings came down as a result of controlled demolition and that they have the scientific proof. That part of the crime is covered up. www.ae911truth.org. They are not conspiracy theorists and nor am I.

"Golly, Tony Blair was good. His language was precise which is important when giving orders. He communicated calm and decisiveness. It wasn't an act. He knew what to do. It was his moment."

How are clear orders good ones? That's a nonsense argument. An alternative way of looking at this was it right to react in a boisterous, aggressive, posturing and hypocrisy?

Nicaragua's daily had the headline 'Armageddon' and highlighted "But we have had our Armageddon. And YOU were responsible for it."

Violence is wrong irrespective of whom is the victim. Why do you, Mr. Black, shriek when the target is New York and Washingtong DC? Are you only disgusted when 'we' are the target?

Mr. Blair demonstrated NO "virtuoso display of crisis leadership" whatsoever. All he did was make a verbal exclamations, none of which followed because they were illegal(EG; shooting down civilian arliners that are hijacked is illegal).

You refer also to "the Cabinet Office Assessments Staff, I had been one of the group detailed by our boss, John Scarlett, to prepare an intelligence briefing." but stop. No doubt because that briefing didn't have any intelligence of the perpetrator. No one knew whom planned the 9/11 attack until after Khalid Sheik Muhammad was captured in 2002. And Blair admitted to Scarlett he knew nothing about Islamist groups, I can only wonder why you omitted that....

Comments are now closed on this article