The unvarnished truth about Ronald Reagan
Alexander Cockburn: Behind the sunny disposition was a callous man with a breezy indifference to suffering
The Reagan cult celebrates the centenary of its idol's birth this month, and the airwaves have been tumid with homage to the 38th president, who held office for two terms – 1981-1988 – and who died in 2004. The script of the recurring tributes is unchanging: with his straightforward, sunny disposition and aw-shucks can-do style, the manly Reagan gave America back its confidence.
In less flattering terms he and his PR crew catered expertly to the demands of the American national fantasy: that homely commonsense could return America to the vigour of its youth and the economy of the 1950s.
When the former Hollywood actor took over the Oval Office at the age of 66, whatever powers of concentration he might have once had were already failing. The joint chiefs of staff mounted their traditional show-and-tell briefings for him, replete with simple charts and a senior general explicating them in simple terms. Reagan found these briefings way too complicated and dozed off.
The joint chiefs then set up a secret unit, staffed by cartoonists. The balance of forces were set forth in easily accessible caricature, with Soviet missiles the size of upended Zeppelins, pulsing on their launchpads, while the miniscule US ICBMs shrivelled in their bunkers. Little cartoon bubbles would contain the points the joint chiefs wanted to hammer into Reagan's brain, most of them to the effect that "we need more money". The president really enjoyed the shows and sometimes even asked for repeats.
Reagan had abolished any tiresome division of the world into fact or fiction in the early 1940s when his studio's PR department turned him into a war hero, courtesy of his labours in 'Fort Wacky' in Culver City, where they made training films.
The fanzines disclosed the loneliness of RR's first wife, Jane Wyman, her absent man (a few miles away in Fort Wacky, home by suppertime) and her knowledge of her husband's hatred of the foe. "She'd seen Ronnie's sick face," Modern Screen reported in 1942, "bent over a picture of the small, swollen bodies of children starved to death in Poland. 'This,' said the war-hating Reagan between set lips, 'would make it a pleasure to kill.'"
A photographer for Modern Screen recalled later that, unlike some stars who were reluctant to offer themselves to his lens in "hero's" garb, Reagan insisted on being photographed on his front step in full uniform, kissing his wife goodbye.
The problem for the press was that Reagan didn't really care that he'd been caught out with another set of phony statistics or a bogus anecdote. Truth, for him, was what he happened to be saying at the time.
When the Iran/contra scandal broke, he held a press conference in which he said to Helen Thomas of UPI, "I want to get to the bottom of this and find out all that has happened. And so far, I've told you all that I know and, you know, the truth of the matter is, for quite some time, all that you knew was what I'd told you."
He went one better that George Washington in that he couldn't tell a lie and he couldn't tell the truth, since he couldn't tell the difference between the two.
His mind was a wastebasket of old clippings from Popular Science, SF magazines (the origin of 'Star Wars', aka the Strategic Defense Initiative), lines from movies and homely saws from the Reader's Digest and the Sunday supplements.
Like his wife Nancy, he had a stout belief in astrology, the stars being the twinkling penumbra of his incandescent belief in the 'free market', with whose motions it was blasphemous to tamper. He believed Armageddon was right around the corner. He also believed tomato ketchup could be classified as a school meal, striking back at the nose-candy crowd who, as Stevie Earle once said, spent the Seventies trying to get cocaine classified as a vegetable.
Hearing all the cosy talk about Ronnie Reagan, young people spared the experience of his awful sojourn in office probably imagine him as a kindly, avuncular figure. Not so. He was a callous man, with a breezy indifference to suffering and the consequences of his decisions. This indifference was so profound that Dante would surely have consigned him to one of the lowest circles of hell, to roast for all eternity in front of a TV set on the blink and a dinner tray swinging out of reach like the elusive fruits that tortured Tantalus.
It was startling, back in 2004 when he died, to see the lines of people sweating under a hot sun waiting to see Reagan's casket. How could any of them take the dreadful old faker seriously? The nearest thing to it I can think of is the hysteria over Princess Di.
The explosion of the Challenger space shuttle of January 28, 1986 prompted one of the peak kitsch moments in a presidency that was kitsch from start to finish. Reagan ended his address to the nation thus: "We will never forget them, nor the last time we saw them, this morning, as they prepared for their journey and waved goodbye and 'slipped the surly bonds of earth' to 'touch the face of God'."
In fact it was the White House that had doomed Christa McAuliffe and her companions to be burned alive in the plummeting Challenger.
The news event required the Challenger to go into orbit and be flying over Congress while Reagan was delivering his State of the Union address. He was to tilt his head upward and, presumably gazing through the long-distance half of his spectacles (one lens was close-up, for speech reading), send a presidential greeting to the astronauts. But this schedule required an early morning launch from Cape Canaveral. Despite the cold January conditions, servile NASA officials ordered the Challenger aloft, with the frozen O-ring fatally compromised.
Reagan dozed through much of his second term, his day easing forward through a forgiving schedule of morning nap, afternoon snooze, TV supper and early bed. He couldn't recall the names of many of his aides, even of his dog.
Stories occasionally swirled around Washington that his aides pondered from time to time whether to invoke the Twenty-fifth Amendment (permitting involuntary removal of the chief executive if he is unable to discharge his duties). Earlier this month his sons disagreed whether or not his Alzheimer's began when he was president. “Normalcy" and senile dementia were hard to distinguish. The official onset was six years after he left Washington DC.
As an orator or "communicator" he was terrible, with one turgid cliche following another, delivered in a folksy drone. His range of rhetorical artifice was terribly limited. The press flattered him endlessly and vastly exaggerated his popularity and his achievements, starting with the nonsense that he “ended the Cold War". He did nothing of the sort, the Soviet Union's sclerosed economy having doomed it long before Reagan became president.
He lavished money on the rich and the Pentagon. The tendencies he presided over were probably inevitable, given the balance of political forces after the postwar boom hit the ceiling in the late 1960s. Then it was a matter of triage, as the rich made haste to consolidate their position. It was a straight line from Reagan's crude attacks on welfare queens to Clinton's compassionate chewings of the lip (same head wag as RR's) as he swore to "end welfare as we know it".
As a PR man, it was Reagan's role, to reassure the wealthy and the privileged that not only might but right was on their side, and that government, in whatever professed role, was utterly malign. ·
Comments are now closed on this article

















Comments
If anything, this understates Reagan's mendacity and duplicity. The guy was an unmitigated disaster--the trends of massive industry deregulation and allowing monopolistic concentration of economic power that he either accelerated or initiated is what made America what it is today--a place with permanent class warfare, an increasingly broke underclass, and the rich getting richer. For someone who claimed to believe in the American dream, Reagan did more than anyone to ensure that it will be out of reach for most Americans for a good long time.
It has caught my attention that the defenders/supporters (who knows they were not clear) of RR have attacked AC but not the points he has put before us. Suppose it makes sense that Ronnie was a simple pres for simple folks, even the ones who despise being labelled simple.
I thought Reagan was the 40th. President? Or at any rate the 39th. if you only count Cleveland once??
bitter bitter man. Hatchett job.
Under Ronald Regan, who stated that government is the problem, the government army and police and prison industries grew tremendously, threatening the freedoms of all. We live with that twisted and mean legacy to this day.
I think I must be growing senile;I actually agree with something Mr Cockburn has written.I must have to admit that while I find almost anything he has written in the past to be trite and not worthy to be called an article fit for public consumption,this one on Reagan is on the mark. The prevailing view of the 38th president is one of the slickest pr con jobs ever perpetrated on a country (similar to the revisionist history of his very good friend and british prime minister-Mrs Thatcher).They were both cut from the same cloth. I remember one press conference where he was asked about the system of apartheid in South Africa and he responded that there was no problem in the country and what was happening was a tribal issue.As a previous commentator said"Reagan was a product of show business,his speechifying was on target for an intellectually trivial audience".Reagan and all of the people who served in his administration could not tell the difference between the real world and the make-believe one of hollywood. So I am not surprised that there is still an ongoing effort to burnish his image. Even his son has said that he was not all there while he was president. Enough said.
As an American, I lived through the eight years of Reagan's reign.
During his campaign, I would tell people he would never be elected because he was too stupid. I totally underestimated the gullibility of the American people. Despite his two terms, I still firmly believe he was a stupid man, a failing noted by his backers, making it easier for them to manipulate him. I later realized it was his "simpleness" that most Americans appreciated. Many Americans, like Reagan, have short attention spans and have no mind for issues they believe are complex. The paucity of quality among Republican presidents is demonstrated by the reverence Republicans have for Reagan and their constant tributes offering him as the best they have had. The man was obviously battling Alzheimers for both of his terms. I had a personal experience with a very close uncle who suffered the same fate, and a cousin. I can say with certainty that Alzheimers is not a condition with a sudden onset. Both my uncle and his son began to exhibit symptoms at least 15 years before they succumbed to the disease.
I distinctly remember two incidents when Reagan was asked questions by the adoring press, both with the same result. His mouth opened but nothing came out - he hemmed and hawed. Nancy leaned towards his ear and in an audible whisper said, "Tell them we are trying our best." Reagan dutifully repeated the not very complex answer.
Another incident that has always stood out concerning his callousness is when he ordered the airstrike on the Libyan leader, Khadafy, a man he seemed to be obsessed with, killing one of Khadafy's adopted children. No apologies, no sorrow - just deserved collateral damage for having an "evil" father.
Well, we know where Mr.Cockburn stands....a bit beyond the pale.
Hmm....and yet millions of people in Eastern and Central Europe see Ronald Reagan, rightly or wrongly, as a symbol of the liberation of their countries. The easygoing, sham Hollywood heroics shook the confidence of the Kremlin to such an extent that it began to lose control of its satellite countries first, and then finally of the Soviet Union itself, which finally imploded under Gorbachev.
The internal stresses of the Soviet Union were the major factor in the collapse, but moribund societies can last for decades until an external stimulus begins the change. Mr Cockburn seems to have a visceral dislike of American society, and this is an unfortunate, tiresome rant, and a discredit to his own intelligence, as more analysis, and less judgment would have been more interesting.
Whether or not this is all completely true, Reagan was a product of show business. His speachifying was on target for an intellectually trivial audience. He was what Americans needed. The US president has long ceased to have any real power, that lies with the heavy money and its manipulators. If you go to a Hollywood movie lot you will see buildings that are nothing more than facades propped up by heavy timbers. This is a metaphor for the US state and its political show business. Don't decry Reagan, he was playing yet another role. He didn't need to learn the words, they were provided by the front people at the moment of delivery. I would like to see some stuff on Wikileaks from that time!
Doesn't really matter about facts, the Americans love a money making opportunity no matter how murky, Michael Jackson being a prime example! Lincoln has been turned in to an industry and so will/have Reagan, Kennedy etc. His apparent senility in office worried me the most, I assume this is where 'star wars' SDI came from?
Mr Cockburn needs a basket of Beecham's Powders or whatever the fashionable remedy now is for what looks like terminal heartburn brought on by non-stop bilious commentary.