Does Julian Assange suffer from being a mama's boy?

Julian Assange

First Post psychoanalyst Coline Covington on the boy with an 'enormous ego' and an adoring mother

LAST UPDATED AT 07:35 ON Wed 22 Dec 2010

In anticipation of their reunion last week, Christine Assange, Julian Assange's 59-year-old mother, declared, "I can't wait to see my son and to hold him close." Christine Assange arrived in London from her home in Australia while her son was still being held in solitary confinement in Wandsworth Prison. After seeing him, she said, "I'm connected back with him again. I've got the connection."

Now released on bail, Julian Assange, his mother and his entourage are spending Christmas together at the Suffolk manor house belonging to Vaughan Smith, journalist and founder of the Frontline Club.

It is clear that Christine Assange feels close to her son. But does the connection between mother and son hold clues to explain his obsession with computer hacking, with exposing secret information, and with the allegations of sexual assault made against him following a trip to Sweden in August?

Julian Assange never knew his father, whose identity remains unknown. What is known is that his mother had been fleeing from a former lover whom she said had been stalking her. Christine Assange's peripatetic lifestyle had only just begun.

A year after Julian's birth, Christine married Brett Assange, the director of a theatre touring company, and the family moved constantly throughout Julian's childhood. By the time Julian was 14 he had lived in 37 different towns, changing schools and sometimes being home-schooled.

Brett Assange recalls that his step-son was a "gifted child with an enormous ego" and that he was "deliberately treated like an adult" by his parents. He also remembers how Julian was often bullied at school for being a "nerd" and at a very young age was fascinated by equipment, taking it apart and putting it back together.

"Strangely enough," Brett Assange admits, "I always thought he would do something like this. He was always very independent and he certainly wouldn't take no for an answer."

By the time Julian was eight, his mother had re-married and gave birth to his half-brother. Three years later, in 1982, this marriage broke up and a custody battle ensued that prompted Christine Assange to go into hiding for the next five years with her sons.

The only stable factor in Julian Assange's early life was his mother. The fact that his mother's relationships with men tended to be fraught with conflict might have also made it difficult for her son to feel close to men or to identify with them positively.
 
At the age of 18, Julian fathered a son, Daniel, with a 17-year-old girl. They set up house together and it was during this time that Julian learned to hack into computers and the internet.

In October 1991, their house in Melbourne was raided by the police and he was subsequently charged with offences relating to computer hacking. His girlfriend fled with Daniel.

Shortly after their separation, Julian became severely depressed and was hospitalised for six months. History repeated itself. The couple embarked on a nine-year custody dispute that was settled in 1999, giving the mother sole responsibility for Daniel's upbringing.
 
Given this background, it would hardly be surprising if mother and son did not have a strong connection, especially during their years of hiding, but also perhaps in Julian's early childhood. His step-father's reference to his "enormous ego" suggests a child who felt that the world revolved around him, a "golden boy" idealised by his mother and "treated like an adult."

Although Julian Assange took his name from his step-father, there seems to have been no real father present in his life. Added to this was a vulnerable mother, needing protection from men, and the young Assange must have found himself in an impossible psychological corner.

Never having known his father, Julian may well have felt rejected by him, angry about the way he had treated his mother (at least in his mind), and possibly angry for leaving him to look after his mother. It is striking that Brett Assange admits that he went along with his wife in deliberately treating Julian "like an adult", suggesting that he did not assume a paternal role towards his step-son and was unable to provide that security for him.

Without parents who were able to set limits and recognise their son's vulnerability, there was no stopping Julian's omnipotent behaviour. As Brett Assange said, "He certainly wouldn't take no for an answer."

When we are infants we all experience ourselves as the centre of the universe. This illusion of omnipotence is necessary psychologically to protect ourselves from overwhelming experiences of helplessness and vulnerability and it is also necessary in establishing a core sense of self that is later modified by the limitations of external reality.

When the mother idolises her child, this early experience of omnipotence remains unmediated and the child's narcissistic bond to the mother is not broken. Mother and son continue to harbour an exclusive relationship from which the father is absent. This can lead in some cases to homosexual disturbances, with the son either turning to men as sexual partners or having fleeting relationships with women, as a way of defending against being engulfed by the mother.

Julian Assange's life's work has been to hack his way into the secrets of the internet, expose these secrets and in doing this to attack and attempt to destroy the reputation of established authority figures. Whatever we may think of WikiLeaks and the role it plays in uncovering global injustices, it is clear that Julian Assange is out to attack the father in the form of government and corporate authority.
 
Assange is also facing allegations of sexual assault where he is being accused of forcing two women to have unprotected sex. His apparent inability to accept a "no" from these women reveals not only a refusal to allow anything to get in the way of his desire to possess and control women but also suggests a lack of respect for women.

In an interview yesterday with John Humphreys on the Today programme, Assange explained, "...they found out that they were mutual former lovers of mine and that they had had unprotected sex and they got into a tizzy about whether there was a possibility of sexually transmitted disease." He went on to say, "It was a ridiculous thing to go to the police about."
 
Assange's fascination for exposing secrets can be likened to the desire to enter the forbidden zone of the parents' bedroom, to steal the magical phallus of the father, and to come between the couple. A journalist recently recounted meeting Assange at a restaurant in Sweden. The journalist was accompanied by his girlfriend.

Assange and the girlfriend went outside to smoke and when the journalist followed them outside to see what was keeping them he could see Assange whispering in her ear. When the journalist challenged Assange, "He dropped into a classic fighter's pose with his fists up." Assange subsequently seduced the girlfriend to spend the night with him. As the journalist commented, "Assange seemed to take pleasure in humiliating me."

While asserting his innocence, Assange accuses others around him of abusing power. He refers to an "espionage indictment made secretly against me in the US", of "investigations conducted in secret", and of a "smear campaign" launched against him. His accusations display a paranoia that only confirms his anxiety that his own attacks are being turned against him. Father is fighting back. He can then become the martyr son who is abused by the father - a hero and a victim at the same time.

But in considering these attempts to usurp the father in order to regain exclusive possession of the mother, we come back to the question of Assange's relationship with women. In his desire for unprotected sex, Assange is asserting his right to impregnate women - even against their will. But these are not women he has a serious relationship with. Like his unknown father, he too will presumably disappear.

Is this his attempt to turn the tables and to wreak revenge on the mother who loved him and left him? This may also explain Assange's breakdown when his girlfriend and mother of his son left him after his arrest. The trauma of this abandonment may have reverberated with an earlier trauma of being adored and then betrayed by his mother.

Is Assange caught in some unconscious enactment that is tragically leading him to self-destruction? He models himself as a hero fighting injustice but the real injustice may very well be buried in his psyche. · 

Comments

Coline, do you read what you write? or is the kettle on straight afterwards and the feet put up on the desk?
Just read two of your articles, and they are drivel, the one above, and one re the holocaust. Its dangerous when people like you get to inform people with what you gauge are 'facts' they are nothing more than your opinions wrapped up in 1st year psychological theories. Julian Assange has not been convicted on any crimes, and in this country, you are innocent until proven guilty. Re the leaks, we elect these people to positions of great power, so when they do things in my name, I want to know about it. The greatest threat to american lives is american foreign policy, not how Julian got on with his mother.

The pseudo psych analysis of Julian Assange is incorrect.

First, credible research(Please see this article: http://www.thelizlibrary.org/therapeutic-jurisprudence/LIZ-COMMENTS-ON-l...) has confirmed over and over again that as long as a child has a strong bond with the primary caregiver(usually the mother), there are no adverse reactions. The myth that all children growing up in single mother homes are deprived is the theme in this article. It should be noted that its against the convention of the rights of the child to discriminate against children simply because they did not grow up in a nuclear family setting. I hope that is grounds for certain qualifications to be revoked as I would not trust a practitioner with this type of judgement to represent psychology in any shape or form.

Secondly, the author must have an extremely old version of the diagnostic and statistical manual to have used, "homosexual disturbances" as homosexuality is not a disturbance. There is no credible scientific institution in the world that would support that. I hope that the appropriate legal action is taken in relation to that.

Balderdash. Bashing single parents for the so called ills of society: single patents are damned if they do & damned if they don't. Change the record.

I'd say now would be a good time for someone to psychoanalyse the self-righteous c covington and see what turns up. Tom O'farrell asks "There seems to be a determination by all the media to avoid the ugly truth. To be reactionary. Why? " -- easy, I'll tell you why. Because he is showing them up for not doing the job they should be doing. They have all slumped into rehashing corporate and government press handouts. They don't know how to / dare not ask embarrassing questions.

Interesting that all of these comments negative to the article are written by men. What's the problem? (It's not like there isn't any coverage of the material they stole.) There's so much written about the psychological motivations of other people who have affected history, Hitler and Churchill are just two examples. Perhaps it is because I am a woman I have thought all along that the issues Covington brings up must be true. Surely someone as bright as A. is alleged to be, but matured and responsible, less self-centered and less of an angry child, could have figured out a way to expose the truth without putting so many people in harm's way. As a mother, at the least, that is what I would have wanted my child to do whether he was an outlaw or a head of state.

Pitiful waste of column inches.
Report the real issues raised, and don't shoot the messenger!

SOMEBODY PLEASE GIVE ONE EXAMPLE OF A TERRIBLE CRIME BY OUR GOVERNMENTS THAT WIKILEAKS HAS EXPOSED

@ Len Aldis

What 'crimes committed by our Governments' has wikileaks exposed?

I cannot think of one single example of a serious revelation from Wikileaks.

All he has done is exposed s lot of people to terrible risk and caused great problems for the diplomats of the world.

Yet another Establishment figure attempting to rubbish the character of Assange. People should remember that whilst JA founded Wikileaks, he works with many other individuals now who are exposing the follies and immoral deeds of governments/agencies/political leaders throughout the world. And to that end, they should all be applauded.

The propositions that Jullian Assange is either a mother's boy or a brat demonstrate a misunderstanding of what he is about. C. Covington has some nice points but the path Assange has to tread is a lot more complex than reacting to his tricky childhood which he did not choose. He has made the war on terrorisn look sick and those who prosecute it look like terrorists. No mean acheivement.

What a waste of space! I can't remember when I last read so much Psychodrivel. Perhaps if you expanded on this theory, Assange was responsible for slaying his father. In case you hadn't noticed Assange has been on the opposite side of the globe to his mother for some time, fighting what he believes is the 'good fight'. One further point, if your theory about mother/son relationships is correct, there must be many thousands of narcissistic sexual preditors out there as a result of all of the broken marriages or relationships in recent history.

I totally agree with Len Aldis. Chasing after a few column inches putting down Assange is simply detracting from the fact that WikiLeaks has brought to light the underhand dealing of our governments.

So what if he's had a difficult past and possibly is not as squeaky clean as he makes himself out to be. This has no bearing on the fact of what his organisation has published.

Shame on you, First Post. This sort of reporting is not what I've come to expect from you.

I presume this article was asked for by the editors, it was an assignment. Why? It is in essence a hatchet job on Assange.
I agree with others, why no articles on the monstrous acts committed by the ISAF in Afghanistan, no coverage for instance of the GRANAI massacre (google it) of 92 children in one single airstrike that slaughtered about 144 civilians, and many other such atrocities. I can list a handful off the top of my head. There seems to be a determination by all the media to avoid the ugly truth. To be reactionary. Why? It's not necessary to play a subservient role to the Governments. In fact it's necessary to do the opposite.

Thank goodness, the NATO troops that tortured and beat Iraqi and Afghan POWs to death don't have mommy problems. If they did we could dismiss their actions as well as Assange's.
Assange did help form the Bradley Manning Support Network and did kick in $20K US. It's not is fault corporate media find someone that is not locked up in a cage incommunicado sexier.

Puff and fluff! What's your problem First Post. The weather frozen your brains?

What a load of crap. Assange is a huge benefit to society, lets hope more of the same get on with the job. If the paranoid US government thought for a while they would get this stuff published before Wikkileaks

All this is irrelevant and is drawing attention away from the real story, which is the fascist Americans persecuting him for daring to expose their dirty laundry in public.

So C.Covington joins others of the media in digging into the background of Julian Assange, looking for what? The space taken up by the article would have been better used in supporting the exposure he and his team have shown of the crimes committed by our governments.

Amazong what can be gleaned from a few tea leaves.

This guy is a JOKE. He puts people's jobs, even their lives at risk with his Illegal publications, which was stolen information that he no doubt gets paid a small fortune for, while the guy that actually stole it for him rots in an American jail. Then he's got the front to complain about the other members of the press revealing leaked information about his lurid sex life. Me thinks this spoilt brat needs a lesson in life!

Comments are now closed on this article