Human rights whitewash from the White House

US turns a blind eye to the savagery in Bahrain and in America’s own jails

Column LAST UPDATED AT 10:09 ON Thu 26 May 2011
Alexander Cockburn

Was there ever a nation so marinated in hypocrisy as America? Week after week President Barack Obama trumpets Uncle Sam's virtues and dispenses homilies to other nations on how to behave themselves and honour freedom and democracy. This last week it's been Europe's turn to hear these self-righteous preachments.

A couple of weeks ago, Secretary of State Clinton attacked China, contrasting untiring efforts by the US to encourage human rights around the world, at a time when the Chinese "are trying to stop history, which is a fool's errand. They cannot do it. But they're going to hold it off as long as possible".

A week earlier Obama signed an expanded trade pact with Colombia where, in 2010, 51 Colombian labour organisers were murdered, many of them by government-sponsored death squads.  As Richard Trumka, America's top labour leader, remarked, it was doubtful the trade agreement would be moving forward if 51 CEOs had been killed.

If there's one state in the Middle East where the US surely has clout it's Bahrain, which just happens to be the base for the US Fifth Fleet. While Clinton was wagging her finger at China, details were surfacing of the ferocious repression of Bahrain's Shia majority by the island state's Sunni rulers, backed by Saudi troops.

Masked squads raid Shia villages at night. At least 27 Shia mosques and religious meeting places have so far been wrecked or bulldozed flat. If this was Libya, Clinton would be trumpeting the repression as requiring Nato intervention. Not so in Bahrain.

As my brother, Patrick Cockburn, has reported in the Independent, "Facing little criticism from the US, otherwise so concerned about human rights abuses in Libya, the al-Khalifa family is ruthlessly crushing opposition at every level... al-Jazeera revealed... that the Bahraini police has been raiding girls' schools, detaining and beating schoolgirls, and is accused of threatening to rape them."

Amid Obama's grandiose eloquence about freedom, he has effectively excluded Palestinians from his supportive embrace and, amid meaningless verbal froth, collapsed yet again in the face of Israeli intransigence.

The New York Times reported last week that, thus far with US government complaisance, Abu Dhabi has hired Erik Prince, the former SEAL and founder of the private security firm Blackwater, to recruit an 800-member battalion of foreign troops for the United Arab Emirates. The troops include Colombian veterans, probably fresh from shooting and torturing union organisers back home.

The Times said it has documentary evidence that the unit is being formed by Prince's new company, Reflex Responses, with $529 million from the UAE, and will be used to thwart internal revolt, conduct special operations and defend oil pipelines and skyscrapers from attack.

So at the practical level, where it really counts, the US is doing its level best to "stop history".

Nauseating though the self-righteousness is about the US's double standards abroad, it pales before the macabre spectacle of Obama and Clinton extolling the moral credentials of a country with a vast gulag of some 2.3 million behind bars - 743 prisoners per 100,000 population, compared to Russia's 580, China's 186, England and Wales' 154 and India's 32. In America today, more than seven million people are under correctional supervision.

At the start of last week, the US Supreme Court ordered the state of California to reduce its prison population, currently running at 143,335, by more than 30,000. The state's prisons, at anything even remotely approaching standards not in violation of the Eighth Amendment forbidding cruel and unusual punishment, could accommodate 80,000.

Not for the first time, the ghastly conditions of California's prisons have been unsparingly described: people with terminal cancer in spaces the size of telephone booths left to die without treatment or even painkillers; convicts crammed three tiers high in prison gyms.

California rarely executes prisoners in San Quentin on death row. Informal executions are a different matter. A California court found that "an inmate in one of California's prisons needlessly dies every six or seven days due to constitutional deficiencies". Prison rape across the country is a given - at least 216,000 cases in 2008. Most of the rapists (according to the libertarian magazine Reason, which recently published a fine report on US prisons) aren't other prisoners but corrections officials.

Yet one million of the 2.3 million prison population are inside for non-violent offences, predominantly related to drugs. More than 800,000 are arrested each year for marijuana alone.

Governor Jerry Brown has suggested non-violent prisoners be sent from the state prisons to local jails, but California has no money to beef up the local hoosegows. Meanwhile policies deriving from the 1990s and before feed more and more prisoners into the system, many of them under the three-strikes law which hands out 25-year sentences for a third offence as trivial as stealing a $2 pair of socks.

America's penal conditions make a mockery of the constitution and foster crime, all against a backdrop of statistics - the FBI dispensed another batch last week - showing that crime rates have been steadily falling to levels unseen for a generation or more. America's current Depression has not seen a surge in robberies and violent crime, as many expected. Attempts to prove the efficacy of harsh codes of imprisonment and sentencing speedily collapse under statistical data.

America's prison population and treatment of citizens and immigrants trapped in the judicial system is a foul blot on the entire society and its political culture - but not one that Obama has shown the slightest interest in confronting. Indeed, his Justice Department is intent on adding more "mandatory minimum sentences" to the sentencing guidelines.

How much more pleasant it is to lecture other nations, while running on a re-election platform currently based on dispatching a death squad halfway round the world to Abbottabad on a lawless mission of revenge. · 

Comments

Our failure to stop the injustices in Bahrain, the UAE, Palestine and in American prisons - and those are huge failures to be sure - does not mean that our decision to do something about the injustices in Libya is wrong.

No lets move on to the Tea Party - a good idea to begin with that has totally lost its way and has morphed into a bunch of power hungry jerks who now want to control women's body and her right to choose - and are just as nuts and radical to the right as the left is - we need stability and middle of the road thinkers - who look at issues without some outdated religion getting in the way.

I totally agree with many statements made in this article - and as far as I'm concerned we should take care of business first in America before we go sticking our noses into the problems in any other country - and we should also stop all foreign aid - including what we send to Isreal - if you don't want some jerk - like the one we now have in the WH - telling you what to do - stop taking our money - this country is in big trouble - probably more then we have a clue about - we have the worst president ever and nothing better on the horizon for 2012 - billions of $$ in debt to China - a jerk who just keeps flying around the world for no reason and makes a fool of himself on every trip - who has managed to lock-up every bit of personal info about himself & along with his wife who quote "was never proud of this country" to begin with -has another yr and a 1/2 in office where he will try to totally destroy us. Add to that a brain dead congress - both dems and republicans - who have their own agenda that has nothing to do with actually taking care of the American people - we are in deep ####.

What people forgets about Obama is this, he was here (Europe) to improve his White credentials in Ireland then mingle with White Aristocrats in UK to secure his second terms in White House, while the Human Rights and other moral values are in trash can, of-course with Monarch Blessings!

All true, much of it maddeningly true. But it's also appropriate to point out two truths about Alexander Cockburn: First, he's always critical of the US, but almost never prescriptive. Second, the most important truth of all is that if he'd written an analogous artcle criticizing the leaderships of China, Qaddafi's Libya, et al, he would immediately disappear and we would never hear from him again. US hypocrisy, yes. But let's also recognize that the US is one of precious few countries where you can call it that publicly and not be immediately imprisoned. A special note on the Palestinians: Obama is pushing as hard as he can. I was shocked that he had the courage to mention the pre-1967 borders as such during his speech - and of course, the Israelis immediately freaked out. Obama backtracked during his speech to AIPAC, to be sure, but the net effect is that "the pre-1967 borders" are now codified in a way that they were not before among American rank and file voters. Surely that will help the Palestinians. I'm afraid you have to live here Alexander, to understand how strong the pro-Israel lobby is. Against that backdrop, Obama did pretty well.

I totally agree. Bahrain has been totally ignored by the press in America. What do we have to gain by not telling the truth about it.

Libya is an illegal operation. NATO is over there to support the globalists. Gadafy has done nothing to warrant anyone bothering that country. We are not the policemen of the world. GAdafy doesn't owe any money to the world bank, and was involved in creating a system for the water to be use as irrigation for food. So you tell me why we are over there.

I am also very disappointed, the arrogance of Obama was not reported or shown in the video regarding his toast to the Queen. He is so full of himself, I guess the orchestra was supposed to stop while he ran his mouth What an embarassment he is to the US. Worse than Bush or Clinton or Quayle ever was. He seems to think he is somebody! His wife looks awful most of the time. Some of her outfits this time look better. The gown exposing all that skin, was terrible, she is too old to wear that, and too everyone else looked respectable, she looked like a tart.
I can't imagine what the Queen must have thought, probably, "no better than the last hillbilly we had to have over here!" (meaning Clinton)

Thank you once again for writing the truth. One of the most revolting presentations is Mrs. Clinton telling us what a wicked man Gadaffi is, and how the US and NATO are protecting civilians by virtue of yet another UN Resolution interpreted by the Axis of Evil, namely Barry da Bomber, CaMoron and So Cozy

I showed great interest in what you wrote until I got the what you wrote about the Palestinians and then realised that you might not know what you are talking about.

Comments are now closed on this article