What made Anders Breivik quote from the Daily Mail
So hysterical is the immigration debate thatMelanie Phillips and Jeremy Clarkson are cited in the killer's manifesto
The European far right has been at pains to distance itself from Anders Behring Breivik's psychotic act of holy war on Friday and present his actions as an isolated act of extremism by a lone madman.
But his ideas and motivations reflect a set of assumptions that spans the far right and many mainstream political figures and media commentators.
In his classic study of the American right, The Paranoid Style in American Politics, Richard Hofstadter once observed a tendency towards "heated exaggeration, suspiciousness, and conspiratorial fantasy" to which the American right was particularly prone.
In Hofstadter's formulation, "The paranoid spokesman sees the fate of conspiracy in apocalyptic terms — he traffics in the birth and death of whole worlds, whole political orders, whole systems of human values. He is always manning the barricades of civilization."
These characteristics have been evident for many years in Europe's shrill and often hysterical "debate" about immigration.
For more than a decade, internet bloggers, far-right demagogues and mainstream media pundits have depicted Muslim immigration as an ‘invasion' facilitated by a liberal/leftist political and cultural establishment driven by political correctness and a suicidal ‘ideology' of multiculturalism.
Few people are likely to be surprised that Breivik praised the English Defence League in his 1,500-page 'manifesto'. But he also quoted both Melanie Phillips of the Daily Mail (often and at length) and from Jeremy Clarkson's Sunday Times column.
He cites an article by Phillips (above right) about Labour's immigration policy in which she writes: "It was done to destroy for ever what it means to be culturally British and to put another 'multicultural' identity in its place." And he quotes Clarkson (above left) saying: "Discrediting national flags as signs of 'bigotry' is happening all over the Western world."
This depiction of 'indigenous' European cultures as an endangered species also extends to more intellectually respectable mainstream conservatives such as Niall Fergusson and Sir Martin Gilbert.
Both historians have praised the conspiracy theory/fantasy of Eurabia, propagated by the British/Egyptian writer Bat Ye'or, which argues that Europe is being inexorably transformed into a Muslim colony - a notion that has become a virtual idee fixe in the visions of cultural downfall propagated by the extreme right.
All these ideas can be found in Breivik's video, 2083: A Declaration of European Independence, which he posted on Youtube (now removed) to justify his actions on Friday.
Accompanied by a soundtrack of portentous music, a succession of images, texts and slogans presents a dark vision of a continent already subjugated by a "multi-culturalist alliance" of Marxists, "suicidal humanists", "capitalist globalists" and jihadists, in which "a majority of our cities will be Muslim cities" by 2025.
For Breivik, multiculturalism is "an anti-European hate ideology" propagated by the "Cultural Marxist traitors" who are paving the way for a Eurabian Europe.
Interestingly Breivik singles out the BBC as a particularly egregious component of this multicultural/jihadist conspiracy, with a mock mission statement that proclaims: "If you don't support our cultural Marxist views you are, by default, a fascist-racist-Nazi-monster".
This sense of victimhood is a recurring feature of what we might now call ‘the paranoid style in European politics', and it is not limited to right-wing internet forums and anti-Muslim hate sites.
Among the Melanie Phillips pieces Breivik cites in his manifesto is a recent one in which she argued that the BBC rather than Murdoch's News International was the real threat to British media because its world view was based on the idea that "traditional Christians are all fundamentalist bigots… opponents of mass immigration are racist".
The point about this analysis is that it is not an analysis at all. It is merely a set of prejudices without any empirical foundation. Breivik's formulations reflect the same tendencies. But where he differs from some – not all – of his contemporaries, is in his resolute determination to ‘act' in order to prevent the 'evil genocide' taking place in Europe.
Thus, on Breivik's video, potted vignettes of Charles Martel, El Cid, Richard the Lionheart and – unusually – Vlad the Impaler alternate with pictures of the Crusades as an inspiration for a new Knights Templar offensive aimed at 'decimating' the Cultural Marxists and driving Muslims from Europe.
This new knightly order is embodied by Breivik himself, the ideal of the 'Perfect Knight'. In the last section of the video, comic-book illustrations of sword-wielding knights cut to photographs of the steroid-taking comic-book crusader, posing for posterity as a Freemason in some kind of military uniform covered in medals, and action-man style in a wetsuit with a machine-gun.
Geert Wilders, Marine Le Pen and the EDL leadership may well be shocked at the horror which this homicidal narcissist unleashed in Oslo and on Utoeya island, but those who propagate fantasies of immigrant invasions and civilisational collapse cannot be entirely surprised that there are those who take such fantasies literally and engage in their own form of 'war'.
Breivik is not the first far-right activist to contemplate such acts in recent years, and unless European civil society and politicians can find the will to recognise, confront and isolate the toxic and often delirious bile in which his fantasies of 'resistance' marinated for so long, he may not be the last.
• Matthew Carr is the author of 'The Infernal Machine: an Alternative History of Terrorism', published by Hurst. ·
Comments are now closed on this article
















Comments
"Finally, I also suggest that the author educate himself somewhat a read Patrick Buchanan's 'The Death of the West', Mark Steyn's 'America Alone', and Walter Laquer's 'The Last Days of Europe', and stop acting as a propaganda machine for the hard Left. "
Ahahahaha. Yes, trawling through the senile babblings of broken minds will certainly educate someone! Or shoudl that be "edumacate", given the low intellectual standards of the window-licking mouthbreakers on the Right?
For those who support you views Mr Carr, please feel free to ridicule what is clearly ridiculous.
Finally, I also suggest that the author educate himself somewhat a read Patrick Buchanan's 'The Death of the West', Mark Steyn's 'America Alone', and Walter Laquer's 'The Last Days of Europe', and stop acting as a propaganda machine for the hard Left.
May 30, 2011 Spectator - Melanie Phillips
"Precisely why Britain's Conservative-led government has drunk so deeply of the anti-Israel Kool-Aid isn't clear. Sucking up to Obama? Muslim demographics in the UK? Part of Cameron's hopey-changey-lefty-loopy repositioning of the Tory Party? Yet another bone tossed to the blood-libelling knitted organic vegan victimologists, aka his LibDem coalition partners?"
This is just one tidbit from a column written by Melanie Phillips. The extreme rhetoric and wildly pessimistic adversarial approach to any subject is not journalism or reporting. It is her writing her own manifesto. Is it any wonder that the Breitvers, McVeys and Loughners of the world are inflamed and further unsettled by these illogical and inflammatory rants? No doubt that she and Glenn Beck are soul mates. Mores the pity for the rest of the world.
And, to add one last point, I said 'Nowhere in those individuals' writings will you find any exhortations to violence'. But you will find plenty in the Qur'an.
Maurice, the author hasn't ridiculed any of these views. He was just describing them. They do look ridiculous written down in black and white though, don't they?
Labour did set out to change the face of Britain by opening the doors to mass immigration. Its a matter of record. They did it to rub conservative Britain's nose in diversity and for narrow party political advantage. See the following article by Ed West http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100025635/labours-secret-plan-t... . Now if all this is wrong I'll be happy, and not a little relieved, to hear about it.
I think the Left need to examine to what degree they have contributed to the current climate of fear by their own actions. There is also a similar case for those on the right ensuring they are responsible and factually based.
I think the writer misses much with regard to the concern ppl have with regard to islam, immigration and multi-culture etc. However, if I may I would like to point out that while Beck can say outrageous things quite often, he is NOT a shock jock. He isn't even a DJ. Which as you know is Disk Jockey. A guy who plays records. Beck doesn't do that. Now the decadent Howard Stern may be properly described as a shock jock since music plays a part in his program.
Clearly the guy is a bit crazed and what he did was unacceptable. However I do understand his point of view that the western world is rapidly being taken over by the religious cultures, and people form countries who can not even look after themselves. Unfortunately europe hand out benefits to anyone, whether they ever paid a penny in tax or not. It's disgusting how we allow ourselves to be run out of our own countries, and that the laws still respect religion even though after thousands of years, there is not a single shred of evidence to support any belief.
It is not that the right wing in Europe is trying to distance itself from Breivik, rather it is the left wing that is engaging in an orgy of blaming the right. Some are even blaming Sarah Palin! There are only two references to Melanie Phililps work in Breivik's 1500 pages. Those references are to two articles published in the Daily Mail, a mainstream British paper -- one on mass fatherlessness in Britain, and the other on the revelation by a former civil servant of a covert Labour government policy of mass immigration into Britain. There is no reference whatever Phillip's writing on Islamisation.
Not only that, Breivik name-checks a vast number of mainstream writers and thinkers, including Bernard Lewis, Roger Scruton, Ibn Warraq, Mark Steyn, Theodore Dalrymple, Daniel Hannan, Diana West, Lars Hedegaard, Frank Field, Nicolas Soames, Keith Windschuttle, Edmund Burke, John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, Friedrich Hayek, Winston Churchill, Mahatma Ghandi, George Orwell and many others; indeed, it's a roll call of western thinking and beyond, past and present.
Yes, Mathew Carr, we understand your message. It is loud and clear. Manichean dialectic rules, OK? All those who fear the consequences of the exponential growth in the number of Muslims (immigration plus live births) in both the UK and in Western Europe as a whole are dangerous extremists who, with no warning, will become, just like the average member of the British Conservative Party would have done if Lady Thatcher had continued to rule, a lunatic mass murderer. I note you forgot Lady Thatcher, so now I have mentioned her for you.
How you persuaded FirstPost to publish your article amazes me.
Excellent article, especially so as it exposes weakness and duplicity of your own argument.
Over past 4 decades Europe had more than its share of left-wing violence and terrorism (Italy, Germany). Gloating over the tragedy of the right does you little good.
You join the amen corner of shedding crocodile tears for the Muslims. Your argument, essentially, is a ruse.
Breivik's shooting is monumentally tragic. Nobody disputes that. You then, conveniently, go your own way - hoping that readers will follow - ranting about "the right's" rants against the "left's immigration conspiracies."
You, evidently deliberately, sidestep the fact that the gunmen who was methodical and took time to prepare, did not target the Muslims, which he could have, but the government (government building, and government sponsored youth conference.)
Why not ask: Where does the government's licence stop and responsibility begin with respect to its own citizens' tolerance? There is little point in terming Breivik as "insane" as some have done. His sensitivity threshold was simply lower than most of us. He "snapped" sooner, but at some point we all snap.
Whether governments are left or right they cannot exculpate themselves from having driven Breivik to horrendously tragic act. By the same token you do no favours to yourselves and your readers by resorting to cliches.
He quotes from Melanie Phillips because she happens to be correct, or at the very least somewhere close to the truth. Although what Breivik did was despicable, it doesn't mean that he was incapable of spotting some truth when he saw it. After all, he also quotes from the Bible, which is also on his recommended reading list. Because he recommends it, do you think we should all stop reading it? Because he quotes a sensible interpretation of events from Phillips, does that mean Phillips is some far right extremist rabble rouser? Absolutely not. Trying to pin the problems in society on those who point out (and get very upset about) the elephant in the room, rather than on those who brought or allowed the elephant in, is extremely disingenuous.
Breivik is an arse - doesn't make you right though.
Those who would oppose your views Mr Carr will not do so because of the attendant horror & hysteria --- but to ridicule them (opposing views) I believe isn't actually to address them.