Iran helping Syria in brutal crackdown on protesters
President Assad getting equipment and ‘lessons’ from Tehran as reports speak of horrors in Syria
Amid reports of worsening human rights abuse in Syria, with security forces apparently shooting doctors and nurses tending wounded demonstrators, an unofficial briefing in Washington claims that the regime in Iran is actively supporting Syria by providing crowd control equipment and advice.
Unnamed officials in the Obama administration have told the Wall Street Journal that Tehran is sharing "lessons learned" from the 2009 post-election crackdown when ordinary Iranians took to the streets to protest at Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's re-election as president. Over 60 Iranians died in those protests; others have disappeared into Tehran's jails.
Furthermore, Iran is said to be providing Syria with technical assistance to monitor and control emails sent by opposition groups trying to organise pro-democracy demonstrations across Syria.
Today's Journal report follows a White House statement on Tuesday which called the escalating repression in Syria "outrageous". Numerous reports have claimed that the Syrian authorities are purposefully blocking off hospitals and preventing doctors from reaching the wounded.
Equally shocking are the unconfirmed reports of security forces shooting soldiers who refuse to fire on civilian demonstrators.
Speaking to Human Rights Watch (HRW) in the southern city of Daraa, one witness, 'Ahmad', said that he had seen roughly 35 people falling to the ground after security forces with Kalashnikovs and snipers fired directly into the crowd during protests on April 8.
He told HRW that the same security services then refused to allow ambulances to drive near the road, and that they shot at those who tried to collect the wounded. He said he later saw the bodies of a doctor, a nurse and an ambulance driver, all of who had apparently been shot dead while working.
In Harasta, a town near Damascus, a doctor told HRW that soon after protests there on April 8, he started receiving calls asking for help. "I knew people could not bring the wounded in," he explained. "The hospital was surrounded by the security personnel. We also couldn't send an ambulance, fearing the security forces would open fire, as happened in other places."
There have been persistent rumours that security forces have shot some soldiers dead when they refused to open fire on protesters in the coastal city of Banias over the weekend. Wassim Tarif, from the human rights organisation Insan, named Mourad Hejjo as one such example, telling the Guardian that, "his family and town are saying he refused to shoot at his people".
Speaking to The First Post, Maha Abu Shama, a campaigner for Amnesty International's Middle East and North Africa programme, said she had heard similar reports. “One protestor told us that he heard that the soldiers were shot in the back, indicating that they were not shot by protesters," Shama said. "The brother-in-law of one of the soldiers said in an interview that he was shot by security forces on Friday, but his name is not one of the dead soldiers listed by the Syrian state news."
However, there have also been reports that protesters in Banias had their own guns, and that they killed some of the soldiers. State-run news channel SANA reported the story by saying that nine Syrian soldiers were killed on Sunday by terrorists and thugs.
Attempts to corroborate these reports are hampered by President Bashar al-Assad's government, which continues to blame the unrest on foreign conspiracies and attacks by random armed gangs and which bans foreign journalists entering the country. Those already in Syria are forbidden to travel outside Damascus, and many have been forced to write under pseudonyms.
The current unrest in Syria began when a dozen people were shot dead by police during demonstrations in Daraa three weeks ago. Since then protests have spread across the country, including to the capital city of Damascus. The official death count stands at 171, with unofficial estimates putting the figure much higher. Hundreds of people, including activists, writers and journalists, have been arrested and remain incommunicado.
British foreign secretary William Hague has admitted that the situation is "deeply troubling", and says "violence against protesters is unacceptable".
"This isn't surprising," Shama told The First Post. "In Syria there is quite a history of impunity over human rights abuses and a massive lack of accountability. We are very concerned. ·
Comments are now closed on this article
















Comments
The "elephant in the drawing room" here is that Islam divides (much like Ulster) into two rival groups; those who think Muhammed's successor should have been a relative, and others who think it should have been his best scholar. Groups known as "Sunni" and "Shi'ite". They've hated each other pretty much since the death of the prophet. Iran is the de facto leader of the Shi'ites, Saudi is the leader of the Sunnis. America can normally be relied upon to support the Sunnis. (Iraq was an anomaly!) Syria, like several other states in the region (Iraq, Bahrain...) is a country with a large Shi'ite majority, which is being ruled by a Sunni minority. Everybody (apparently except the West's media) is aware of this. Remember, these two groups HATE each other at least as fiercely as Ulster and Protestants and Catholics used to; they've got a centuries-old tradition of violence and betrayal between them. Now, you tell us, the leading Shi'ite country is assisting a Syria's ruling Sunni group to oppress other fellow Shi'ites.
Go, Joe! What a revelation (so to speak) - thanks for that deep understanding and helpful explanation of the realities of the Middle Eastern troubles. So, I assume we should really all stand back and just let what-will-happen happen then, if God has it all planned already? But - doesn't it say pretty clearly ''no one shall know the time or the place'' in relation to the times you're talking about? So, if you believe it all so literally, what makes you think you can second-guess God and say 'this' is the time? I imagine you believe Ahmadinejad is 'the beast'?! And what does the bible say about Israel holding nuclear weapons? Or don't they count? God bless you and all your blinkered crowd. Oh - and if the 'rapture' leaves the US without the born-again brigade who include Koran-burning bigots, I don't see how it'll be any worse a place than it is now.............
"At the rapture of the church, the backbone of America". Hmmm? Intelligent, helpful, comment Joe. Do keep posting. The world needs more insightful arguments like this. Inflammatory nonsense.
Thanks for that Joe.
Everything is far more clear now.
Cheers.
The statement by Iranian President Ahmadinejad that the new Middle East will not include the US or Israel is half right and half wrong, according to Bible prophecy.
The outspoken, radical President of Iran, Ahmadinejad, has spewed from his mouth ludicrous statements like, "There was never a Holocaust" and that "Israel must be wiped off the earth" and now he claims that the new Middle East will be without the US and Israel. Ahmadinejad has repeated his statement that the demise of Israel is very close at hand and could happen in the near future. Iran still remains the number one threat to the Jewish state of Israel especially as Iran continues to develop its Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction.
As to Ahmadinejad's statement that the new Middle East will be absent the US and Israel, this is half right and half wrong. At the rapture of the Church, the backbone of America, the born-again Christians, will depart this world leaving the US as a nation bent for destruction, thus no America in a new Middle East after the rapture. However, the Jewish state of Israel will be a part of the Middle East, in fact the new Middle East forever as promised in Bible prophecy.
The Abrahamic Covenant, Genesis 15, promises that the Jews will have a nation and a land in the Middle East forever. The Land Covenant, Deuteronomy 30, says that the Jewish state will be ten times as large as it is right now. This means then that the nations missing from the new Middle East will be Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, three quarters of Iraq and three quarters of Saudi Arabia and half the state of Egypt.
Israel will be a nation in the new Middle East forever.