Kate Middleton vs Closer: what the ruling means
Will the damages awarded to the royals for topless photos set a precedent?
A French court has ruled that topless photographs of Kate Middleton taken by paparazzi and published in a French celebrity magazine were an invasion of privacy.
The ruling, just a day after the announcement that the Duchess of Cambridge is pregnant with her third child, brings to an end a five-year legal case.
Earlier this year, six people, including three photographers, were tried after long-lens pictures of the couple on holiday in France in 2012 were published in Closer magazine and a local newspaper, La Provence.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Similar images later appeared in Italian, Swedish and Danish publications after several British papers turned down the chance to buy the photos. The Irish Daily Star also ran the images, but its editor resigned after a public outcry and accusations from a Palace spokesman that the publication of the images was "grotesque and totally unjustifiable".
Now the court has awarded the royal couple €100,000 (£91,000) in damages and interest and ordered both the editor and the owner of the glossy magazine to pay a fine of €45,000 (£41,000) each, the maximum in each case. Closer editor Laurence Piea and publisher Ernest Mauria could have been sent to prison for up to a year, but retained their freedom.
While the amount is one of the highest ever in a privacy case in France, "it is a fraction of the £1.4m the couple wanted over the grainy images", says the Daily Mail.
Neither of the royals attended the court sessions over the years although Prince William did present statements attacking the paparazzi and claiming the impact of the topless photographs was "all the more painful" given the link between harassment by the press and the death of his mother, Diana, Princess of Wales.
The six defendants argued the couple regularly allow their private lives to be sold to millions of people around the world.
During May's hearing, The Guardian reported comments made by Closer's lawyer, Paul-Albert Iweins who attacked the "Anglo-Saxon reasoning behind punitive damages and compensation" and said the trial was hypocritical.
"The public and private lives of the royal couple are so closely linked as to be inseparable," Iweins said, adding it was of "public interest to know that future heirs to the throne have a solid relationship and are getting on well" and that the photographs cast the young couple in a positive light.
While yesterday's guilty verdict was certainly not a surprise, "what was interesting about this case was that the royal couple and their lawyers here were pushing for a much, much larger amount in damages", says the BBC's Hugh Schofield, "in effect, saying the royal couple is different".
"There was an attempt to turn this into a different kind of affair, one in which there would be almost punitive damages awarded against Closer magazine", says the Paris Correspondent.
As it is, while the payout is substantial, is it not the "precedent-setting kind of damages which would really act as a deterrent to Closer magazine and others like it in the future".
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How to find cheaper car insurance as premiums accelerate
The Explainer Car insurance costs are rising but there are ways to put the brakes on price rises
By Marc Shoffman, The Week UK Published
-
What to know when planning an awe-inspiring hike on the Inca Trail
The Week Recommends Peru's most famous trail leads to Machu Picchu
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
Lead poisoning remains a threat
The Explainer The toxin is built into our lives
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Duchess of Gloucester: the hard-working royal you've never heard of
Under The Radar Outer royal 'never expected' to do duties but has stepped up to the plate
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
'Manipulated' photo of UK's Princess Kate spiked
speed read The first official image of Kate Middleton since January has been retracted
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Modern royal scandals from around the world
The Explainer From Spain to the UAE, royal families have often been besieged by negative events
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The Regency Acts: what happens if King Charles can't perform his duties
The Explainer Monarch's responsibilities could be carried out by a regent or the counsellors of state
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
King Charles diagnosed with cancer
Speed Read Monarch 'remains wholly positive about his treatment', during which senior royals are expected to stand in for him
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Princess of Wales to remain in hospital for two weeks as King prepares for prostate treatment
Speed Read The timing of the two royal medical announcements was said to be an 'unavoidable coincidence'
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Crown Prince Frederik and Crown Princess Mary: a guide to Denmark's next king and queen
Why everyone's talking about Queen Margrethe II is stepping down after 52 years on Denmark's throne
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
King laughs about his 'sausage fingers' in new documentary
Speed Read Charles's ample digits have long attracted 'attention and concern' but he is often the 'first to poke fun'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published