Capello ended up a disaster, England will not mourn him

Fabio Capello England manager at the 2010 World Cup

The England manager's legacy will always be tarnished by the debacle of the 2010 World Cup

LAST UPDATED AT 10:35 ON Thu 9 Feb 2012

ON PAPER, Fabio Capello was England's most successful manager, with a win rate 66.6 per cent and only six defeats in 42 games, four of them in meaningless friendlies. But few will remember his reign as a golden era for the national team and his legacy will forever be tarnished by two words... South Africa. In short, he was a disaster.
 
Going into the 2010 World Cup, the Italian could do no wrong. He was the man who had made England great once again. But the traits that defined him - his aloofness and disciplinarian approach - soon became sticks with which to beat him when it became apparent that his tactics weren't working and the players weren't responding.

England limped into the last 16 of the tournament where they were mauled by Germany, and subsequently the media.
 
"The sheen and authority which surrounded him had begun to crack," says Alistair Magowan of the BBC. "In the aftermath, Capello repeated the excuses of his predecessors. His team were too tired after an energy-sapping Premier League season."
 
Then came what Paul Hayward in The Daily Telegraph described as the "dismal moral hokey-kokey" of the captaincy and finally the Italian's resignation after John Terry was stripped of the armband for a second time. Amid all that England qualified for the European Championships but Capello was damaged goods.
 
Now he has gone, the knives are out. Simon Barnes of The Times says Capello treated England as "a kind of retirement job".
 
"You could see that his heart was never in it. He never got the hang of English footballing culture; for that matter, he never even got the hang of the English language.
 
"Capello goes with a brilliant record in qualifying groups... But it is at the big tournaments that you earn your salary and, in Capello's only one, he led England to humiliation."
 
He was stubborn, despite promising to blood fresh talent and introduce a new system after South Africa, and often hasty in his judgment of players says Hayward in the Telegraph. "Michael Owen was bombed almost from the start and Micah Richards has felt the frosty air of the manager's disapproval.
 
"One tournament, £20m-plus in wages and one second-round appearance. This is the epitaph of the Capello years... Few will feel they knew him well and almost no England player will mourn his departure."
 
The FA must take some of the blame, says Martin Samuel in The Daily Mail. He says it is "four years down the drain". After trying and failing dismally to “buy” the World Cup by paying the Italian a fortune, England are left high and dry, without a manager.
 
Someone who can lighten the mood is now required, says Oliver Kay in The Times. "Capello won matches, but failed to win - or rather won and then lost - the hearts and minds of his players and his employers as well as large sections of the supporters and media. The challenge now for [FA chairman David] Bernstein is to make the appointment that will restore optimism for Euro 2012 and beyond."
 
But right now there is little light on the horizon. "Capello's decision to walk last night makes the whole adventure of his appointment a sorry story of missed opportunity and colliding professional values," laments James Lawton in The Independent. "The result is that English football is made, once again, a laughing stock." · 

Disqus - noscript

Is this not the best thing that could have happened?  Capello's intensity was great for getting the unfocused minds of Premier league footballers ready in 2 days for a qualifying match, but far from ideal when you're holed up together for 6 weeks in a hotel. His team selection for South Africa was poor and he was tactically naive, not to mention his mis-communication skills. Pardew, Redknapp, Mourinho, Klinsmann are all better options for a tournament.
South Africa was a disaster. But was that all Capello?
John Terry  running all over the pitch. A team that  immediately reverted to 'hoof the ball', the default England tournament tactic, the moment the slightest difficulty was encountered.

And everyone had a bad South Africa. Except Spain and Germany. It was a lousy tournament.

Would Harry have done any better?

South Africa 2010 a 'lousy tournament'? What are your criteria for this assessment, sir? Your lousy perfotrmance, perhaps?

Yes we qualified for tournaments, but it wasn't always plain sailing and against some poor group sides we were static and uninspiring. Capello never had a plan B or C, so the writing was actually there very early on. His picking of Heskey shows a lack of tactical nous, no hoof to a big man sides win anything anymore, its speed of attack and subtlety now that win, emphasized by Spain and Barcelona. Everytime we're told what a great group of players we have, then the whole squad are like rabbits in headlights. Until we utilise skilful, pacy players we will always be second rate, and have a manager with courage