Ian Hislop's Olden Days: have I got historical myths for you

Apr 10, 2014
Holden Frith

How myths, legends and memories have been used to reshape the past, present and future

MY SISTER, her curiosity piqued by a primary school lesson on prehistoric life, once asked my grandma what it was like to use a bow and arrow. 

It’s a question that neatly illustrates the premise of Ian Hislop’s new BBC2 series on the tricks and treats of history. “Mention the Olden Days to any child and they’ll know exactly what you mean,” he says in the introduction. “It’s a precise historical period dating back from when their parents were children to about 10,000BC.”

Just as the boundaries of the period may be flexible, so are many of the stories it contains. The Olden Days are not a place one goes for facts, but for a misty-eyed retelling of an idealised past.

And Hislop’s contention is that many of these retellings are less than innocent. Myths, legends and memories are reformed according to the needs of each age, and deployed to reshape the present and the future.

The first episode told the interlinked tales of two great Olden Days kings, Arthur and Alfred. King Arthur probably never even existed, and yet he and his knights loom larger than many real-life monarchs.

The legend originated with a monk who claimed his tales of Arthur, committed to manuscript in 1136, were based on an ancient text – but no trace of the supposed source material was ever found. The date is significant, Hislop suggests: with English society divided in the traumatic aftermath of the Norman conquest, both sides could find comfort in King Arthur.

The Normans enjoyed hearing of an old Celtic king who battled with troublesome Saxon invaders, while the Saxons, looking at the same story, saw a local hero fighting against foreign tyranny. Each side saw its own plight reflected in the legend, and each used it to justify its own struggle.

Four centuries later, the young Tudor dynasty turned to Arthur to erase the memory of its humble Welsh origins. Henry VIII commissioned his own round table and placed at its centre, alongside the names of the Arthurian knights, the Tudor rose and a portrait of Arthur that looked remarkably like Henry himself. The message was clear: Henry was no upstart, but a true heir to the most English of ancient kings.

The source material is unbeatable, but the programme is at its best when Hislop moves beyond a simple retelling and develops an argument about what we can learn about ourselves from the way we engage with the past. His case looks set to strengthen in episode two, in which he contends, counter-intuitively, that modern Britain is a product of the Victorians’ obsession with the Middle Ages.

Ian Hislop’s Olden Days continues on Wednesdays on BBC2 at 9pm.

Sign up for our daily newsletter

Disqus - noscript

If you think Arthur is "the most English of ancient kings" then you are ignorant. And if Hislop thinks this as well, then there's obviously no point in watching this series.

Did you even bother to read the article ?