Should Richard III get a state funeral? And if so, where?

It is time to re-evaluate Shakespeare's greatest villain, the last true 'English' king

LAST UPDATED AT 15:35 ON Thu 13 Sep 2012

IF THE ancient bones discovered by archaelogists underneath a car park in Leicester do turn out to be those of Richard III, the last English king to die in battle in 1485, then the question of what to do with them must be addressed.
 
Already there have been calls for a state funeral for the man who was depicted by Shakespeare as a hunchbacked villain and who is widely held to have murdered the Princes in the Tower.
 
The campaign is being led by the Daily Mail which insists that "a more dignified resting-place than a council car park is suitable for a man who was the last truly English king".
 
The paper accepts that there may be opposition. "The most gifted PR man would find rehabilitating Richard a bit of a struggle, even after all these years," writes Simon Heffer. But he points out that when the remains of Tsar Nicholas II were discovered in Russia in the 1990s he was given a state funeral. "I believe we should do something similar for Richard III, if these bones are his."
 
And what about that claim that he was the last "English" king? "The Tudors were Welsh. They were followed by Scots and Germans," argues Heffer.

"Given the case against Richard III is far from proven, but there is much that we know of the good he did in a turbulent age, he deserves, with due ceremony, a decent burial.”
 
Daily Telegraph blogger Ed West agrees that it is time to reassess Richard. "It's certainly true that most people at the time thought Richard a good lawmaker and a pious man (much needed after his brother’s debauchery), and he was especially popular in the north," he writes.
 
Richard's original grave, says West, was destroyed when churches were ransacked during the Reformation, a mere 50 years after his death. The same fate befell the grave of Harold, the English king killed by an arrow to the eye at the Battle of Hastings.
 
"It would be fitting if Richard III and Harold II were given proper burials in the capital. With a Catholic ceremony, obviously," he says.
 
Why London? asks Sunder Katwala, director of the thinktank British Future. Writing in The Spectator he agrees that Richard of York should be given the respect due to a king, but says we should take note of his background.
 
"By all means, let there be a state funeral for Richard, but it should be a state funeral in the north," he wrote. "The last Plantagenet King should lie in state and be buried in York minster. What better way could there be to relearn the history of England, and to realise too that it has not always been a London-centred story?" · 

Disqus - noscript

The Daily Mail article seems to have forgotten that Richard III was a Norman. From Normandy. In France. Last English King indeed.

There is only one location for any reburial of Richard III's remains and that is YORK MINSTER.He was the last Yorkist king.The city always demonstrated its loyalty to him (and still does!) and .......he expressed a wish to be buried there anyway.

Last English (Anglo Saxon) king? None since the 11th century. The others were all decended from Norman ancestry, even the Scots and Welsh.

Richard III was Richard, Duke of Gloucester. Richard of York was his father.

Just looked it up. He was French...Where do we go from here? We're a mongrel race and should face it. However, he reigned here, was of York, so bury him there..

It can only be York. His place is in the minster and I hope it becomes his final resting place.

14 Sept:Richard III was an Angevin [the last of the Plantagenets]:descended from Matilda/Maud,granddaughter of the Conqueror,and the Count of Anjou.Their son ,Henry II,was granted the throne by swearing in 1152 to respect the Traditional Rights and Liberties of the English since 'Time Immemorial'[meaning they were beyond human memory even then].And that is still relevant today.The Queen only holds the Throne on that basis.The Queen,hence Parliament and Cameron only has authority by respecting the Rights and Liberties of the English which were beyond memory even in 1152 (not Human Rights or Health and Safety or a Party programme).OUR legal and recorded Rights go back to the Great Oath of 1152 ;which Magna Carta sought to reafirm.

Richard had a raw deal from history and I'd like to see him given a proper funeral.

There are those campaigning for (and against) a state funeral for Margaret Thatcher. How much more deserving is Richard III! And yes, York Minster is the place.

For further concise, balanced comment and analysis on the week's news, try The Week magazine. Subscribe today and get 6 issues completely free.