Would a third runway solve Heathrow's snow problem?

Heathrow snow

Critics are unimpressed by Heathrow's cancellation of flights before the snow even fell

LAST UPDATED AT 10:06 ON Mon 6 Feb 2012

HEATHROW airport officials are under fire after the weekend's snow caused massive disruption to flights. Britain was swept by blizzards on Saturday night that deposited up to six inches of snow across the country. But while Heathrow airport was forced to cancel more than 40 per cent of its 1,300 scheduled flights yesterday, Stansted, Birmingham, Luton and Gatwick airports were all operating near-normal services.

Heathrow in hibernation?
The Sun is disgusted that Heathrow pre-emptively cancelled flights. "Snow has once again taken Britain by surprise," The Sun notes. "Despite it being forecast a week ago. And despite it being, well, winter. At least we can't say Heathrow wasn't prepared. It took the precaution of cancelling hundreds of flights before a single flake fell." The paper, though, has a helpful suggestion for the bosses at BAA, Heathrow's parent company: "With another month of freezing conditions ahead, here's some advice for the world's third busiest airport: Why not shut entirely and hibernate?"

Time for a third runway?
Peter McKay in the Daily Mail asks why so many flights were cancelled before the snow even fell. "The company responsible, BAA, says Heathrow works to almost 100 per cent of its capacity. They claim congestion caused by bad weather forces the cancellation of flights. It isn’t safe to operate them, we’re told," noting that in November, fog caused cancellations.

What leads to this state of affairs? "Well, if ‘capacity’ is the culprit at Heathrow, as BAA suggests, why not increase it?" McKay asks. Because both the Government and Opposition now oppose it, despite the last Labour government championing it. "Would there be fewer ‘Heathrow Snow Chaos’ headlines if they increased capacity by building the third runway? It would be nice to think so," he concludes.

Heathrow is a special case
"The arrival of the winter's first serious snow across much of the country had the usual consequences," observes The Independent. "We should say, for fairness's sake, that the capital managed to keep the traffic and public transport moving. But still many Heathrow flights were pre-emptively cancelled, with others diverted elsewhere, inconveniencing thousands of travellers."

Before we start to demand the expansion of Heathrow, "it must be recognised that its geographical situation makes it prone to fog and snow and that there will be times when every airport will be defeated by adverse weather. There is certainly room for more improvement at Heathrow, but it is unreasonable to expect perfection, and another runway – as weather-dependent as the other two – would solve nothing." · 

Disqus - noscript

This country is a joke a few snow flakes and we all panic and shut down the country from moving. Why not go and learn from countries like canada and russia and see how they cope with minus 20  and 6 feet of snow.can't be that hard when the conservative government sends aid into the billions shouldn't they try and avoid the economy losing millions through snowfall.
Why not allow direct flights from the north, But that wont happen money money
allow heathrow to expand. it does not require government funds, will improve the operation, will provide much needed jobs both short and long term.
I was born in the village that is due to be demolished if it does expand and for the residents left that didnt take the bond money and leave they know its just a matter of time, so stop dithering and waiting until its too late
Well said Flydarryl !!!!!!!!!!!!!
just use provincial airports with an improved train service
An article full of errors and ignorance from the beginin. Talking of "S.America" as something external... The islands ARE in S. America...! Do you have a map?
Ah the game of fake outrage ...
Buy the local houses at a premium and get on with building a 3rd runway. Virtually all the recent flights i took circle Heathrow for 10 15 minutes because there is no "give" in the system - wasting tonnes of fuel
Like you all I think we need to improve LHR.  At the same time I wish BA woudl fly from Scotland direct to North America.... but Britain needs Heathrow as its main hub - take a look on Google - its full all the time, and its competitors are not.  People in cities live in a noisy environment (I am from Glasgow and should know about it)....  Get it built - and in fact add 2 or 4 runways and more terminals so that the air port can grow.
Fail to see how having 3 inactive snow covered runways is better than only 2. There may be an argument for a 3rd runway but based on capacity rather than weather.

Anyway, we love those 'Britain comes to a standstill as 3 flakes of snow fall overnight' headlines. Fact is it happens so infrequently it just isnt worth spending any more on the problem.
Another runway would improve the situation, because during bad weather flights need to be spread further apart. Amsterdam which is smaller than Heathrow has 4 runways! it makes dealing with such problems far easier.