Thatcher 'accepted' Yvonne Fletcher killer would go free

Margaret Thatcher funeral cost

PM realised 1984 shooting at Libyan embassy demonstration would go unpunished, documents reveal

LAST UPDATED AT 11:15 ON Fri 3 Jan 2014

BRITAIN was given two warnings that a demonstration at the Libyan embassy in 1984 would turn violent, secret government documents reveal. But both warnings were ignored and policewoman Yvonne Fletcher was shot and killed less than 12 hours later. 

The documents, released today by the National Archives, also reveal that Margaret Thatcher "accepted" that no-one would ever be charged over the 25-year-old officer's murder.

The first warning about the demonstration by Libyan dissidents at Tripoli's London embassy was given to the British ambassador to Libya, Oliver Miles, the Daily Telegraph reports. He was told the demonstration "might include violence" and the Libyan government "would not be responsible for the consequences" if the protest went ahead.

Later that day, two Libyan diplomats visited the Foreign Office in London and expressed their concern about the demonstration, the paper says. They too said that if it went ahead "they would not be answerable for the consequences".

Less than 12 hours later, on 17 April, 1984, Fletcher was fatally-wounded in the stomach by a burst of gunfire from within the Libyan embassy. Eleven dissidents opposed to Colonel Gaddafi were also injured in the shooting.

Police laid siege to the building for 11 days. But its occupants were eventually allowed to return to Libya with full diplomatic immunity because Thatcher was worried about the fate of 8,000 Britons in Libya and British diplomatic staff in Tripoli. Those repatriated included Abdulmagid Salah Ameri, the junior diplomat later accused of killing Fletcher.

The documents released today suggest Thatcher accepted that her government would "have to let a murderer go free", the Telegraph says. In a phone conversation with the then home secretary, Leon Brittan, it was agreed that "it was unlikely that adequate evidence could be secured, and that the culprit could be identified," the documents state.

The documents continue: "The Home Secretary asked whether repatriating the Libyan staff, including the perpetrator of the murder, could be defended. The PM thought it could, provided British staff [in Libya] were successfully repatriated too."

The Telegraph says there is "nothing in the files" to suggest the warnings of violence prompted any action from British authorities. There is no suggestion the officers sent to police the demonstration were warned or any extra precautions were put in place.

While Salah Ameri is believed to be dead, a second man, Salah Eddin Khalifa, was identified last year as Fletcher's killer. The question of whether the pro-Gaddafi student fired the fatal shot is the subject of an ongoing investigation by British police. · 

Disqus - noscript

Or to put it another way - The Conservative government of the day refused to be intimidated by an evil dictator, but kept to the obligations of the treaties the UK had signed - even when the temptations to act otherwise were enormous.

Thankfully in those days we had a real leader with guts, integrity and courage.

No doubt today some sort of ban would be placed on the march and grubby deals done. The law is only used for equality terrorism against the majority, and to protect the political class.

For further concise, balanced comment and analysis on the week's news, try The Week magazine. Subscribe today and get 6 issues completely free.