Democrats fracture over 9/11 row
2020 presidential contenders face ‘litmus test’ over Trump’s video of Congresswomen Ilhan Omar’s comments
Democratic presidential hopefuls face a significant test over how they respond to a video tweeted by Donald Trump in which a freshman congresswomen questions the seriousness of the 9/11 terror attacks.
In a clip tweeted by the US president, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar is seen saying “some people did something,” between footage of planes hitting the Twin Towers and people fleeing the buildings.
Republicans have accused her of downplaying the attacks, which has prompted suggestions from right-wing news outlets and some politicans that Omar, a black Muslim women who wears a hijab, is un-American and un-patriotic, and even that her religious beliefs are “antithetical to the United States constitution”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Independent reports that one tweet liked by the president's son, Donald Jr, called Omar’s politics “not American” and suggested she has “no allegiance” to the US.
The first Muslim woman ever elected to Congress, Omar has become a lightning rod for controversy and Republican anger since she was sworn in in January.
But the Democratic leadership and some freshmen Democrats “have disagreed over how to respond to attacks on [her]”, The Guardian reports.
Her criticism of US policy on Israel and claims support was fuelled by donations from powerful Jewish lobby groups drew sharp criticism from Republicans and even some senior Democrats, and was quickly rebuked by House Speaker and nominal head of the party Nancy Pelosi.
However, the response was widely criticised by the younger, progressive wing of the party “furious about the leadership's gambit” says CNN. They questioned why there was not the same denunciation of Republican bigotry and whether it could even put Omar’s life in danger.
Not wanting a repeat of the row which threatened to derail the party’s legislative agenda ahead of next year’s presidential election, for now, “Democrats have largely rallied to her defence, saying she had been quoted out of context and some accusing Trump of inciting violence against her and Muslims” reports the BBC.
Lois Beckett in The Observer writes Donald Trump’s attack on the Muslim congresswoman “swiftly became something of a litmus test for Democratic politicians, as some of the most progressive 2020 presidential candidates spoke most quickly and forcefully in Omar’s defense”.
Senator Bernie Sanders called attacks on Omar “disgusting and dangerous” and said she would not “back down to Trump’s racism and hate, and neither will we”.
Senator Elizabeth Warren said: “The president is inciting violence against a sitting congresswoman – and an entire group of Americans based on their religion. It’s disgusting. It’s shameful. And any elected leader who refuses to condemn it shares responsibility for it.”
By contrast, more centrist contenders, including former vice-president Joe Biden and New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, remained silent in the 24 hours that followed Trump’s tweet.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'Republicans want to silence Israel's opponents'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Poland, Germany nab alleged anti-Ukraine spies
Speed Read A man was arrested over a supposed Russian plot to kill Ukrainian President Zelenskyy
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 19, 2024
Cartoons Friday's cartoons - priority delivery, USPS on fire, and more
By The Week US Published
-
'A speaker courageous enough to stand up to the extremists in his own party'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
How could the Supreme Court's Fischer v. US case impact the other Jan 6. trials including Trump's?
Today's Big Question A former Pennsylvania cop might hold the key to a major upheaval in how the courts treat the Capitol riot — and its alleged instigator
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
'A direct, protracted war with Israel is not something Iran is equipped to fight'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
'Good riddance to the televised presidential debate'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Trump's first criminal trial starts with jury picks
Speed Read The former president faces charges related to hush money payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Making sense of FISA's strange bedfellows in Congress
The Explainer How a controversial intelligence gathering law is bringing progressive Democrats and privacy hawk Republicans together
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
'This isn't judicial restraint — it's judicial activism'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Why are Republicans trying to change Nebraska's Electoral College vote?
Today's Big Question It's a chance for Donald Trump to block Joe Biden's path to re-election
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published