In Brief

Anger as new Indian citizenship bill excludes Muslims

Critics say controversial legislation aims to marginalise Muslims

India’s lower house has passed a highly controversial law that will grant citizenship to religious minorities from three neighbouring countries, but not Muslims.

The citizenship amendment bill means that Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians fleeing persecution in Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan can be granted citizenship.

However, the bill has proven highly controversial, with critics declaring that it is part of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) efforts to marginalise Muslims.

Describing himself as “delighted” by the bill’s passage, Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, tweeted: “This bill is in line with India’s centuries-old ethos of assimilation and belief in humanitarian values.”

But historian Mukul Kesavan told the BBC that while the bill is “couched in the language of refuge and seemingly directed at foreigners... its main purpose is the delegitimisation of Muslim’s citizenship”.

Gautam Bhatia, a lawyer based in Delhi, told the broadcaster that by dividing would-be migrants into Muslims and non-Muslims, the bill “explicitly and blatantly, seeks to enshrine religious discrimination into law, contrary to our long-standing, secular constitutional ethos”.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial subscription today –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

With opposition intensifying, some 100 scientists and scholars at institutions across India and abroad published a joint letter expressing their “dismay” at the legislation and describing the bill as unconstitutional. The careful exclusion of Muslims would “greatly strain” India’s pluralism, the letter added.

There have already been protests in India’s north-eastern states, where residents are angry at the prospect of an influx of Hindus from neighbouring Bangladesh. In some demonstrations protesters set fire to tyres, while tribal groups staged protests in Tripura.

However, senior BJP leader Ram Madhav was unmoved by the opposition, insisting that “no country in the world accepts illegal migration”.

“For all others about whom the bleeding hearts’ are complaining, Indian citizenship laws are there. Naturalised citizenship is an option for others who legally claim Indian citizenship. All other illegal [immigrants] will be infiltrators.”

Recommended

‘Downing Street a crime scene’
Today's newspaper front pages
Today’s newspapers

‘Downing Street a crime scene’

What could happen if China tried to invade Taiwan?
Chinese troops on mobile rocket launchers during a parade in Beijing
Fact file

What could happen if China tried to invade Taiwan?

Africa Cup of Nations: eight killed after stampede in Cameroon
The scene of the stampede at Olembe Stadium in Yaoundé, Cameroon 
The latest on . . .

Africa Cup of Nations: eight killed after stampede in Cameroon

Nato vs. Russia: who would win a war?
Nato troops
In Depth

Nato vs. Russia: who would win a war?

Popular articles

What would a Russian ‘lightning war’ against Ukraine look like?
Members of the Kiev territorial defence forces take part in drills outside Kiev, Ukraine
Getting to grips with . . .

What would a Russian ‘lightning war’ against Ukraine look like?

Is Bosnia on the brink of another civil war?
Bosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik
In Depth

Is Bosnia on the brink of another civil war?

Why is New Zealand shutting its borders again?
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern adjusts her face mask following a press conference
In Depth

Why is New Zealand shutting its borders again?

The Week Footer Banner