Is China’s slow response to blame for the coronavirus outbreak?
State led controls on information may have hampered efforts to curb spread of disease
The Chinese government was too slow to respond to the coronavirus, silencing doctors and potentially aiding its spread, according to reports.
The disease has now claimed over 300 lives worldwide, according to the BBC, including a man in the Philippines whose death was the first outside China.
More than 14,380 people have been infected, with some of the world’s leading experts now saying there are signs that a pandemic is imminent.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“It’s very, very transmissible, and it almost certainly is going to be a pandemic,” Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, told The New York Times. “But will it be catastrophic? I don’t know.”
Did China respond too slowly?
According to The New York Times, “authorities silenced doctors and others for raising red flags” during the crucial seven weeks between the first symptoms of the virus in early December, and the government’s decision to lockdown Wuhan in January.
“They played down the dangers to the public, leaving the city’s 11m residents unaware they should protect themselves,” the paper reports.
Based on interviews with two dozen Wuhan residents, doctors and officials, on government statements and on Chinese media reports, the paper concludes that the Chinese goverment “delayed a concerted public health offensive”.
“By not moving aggressively to warn the public and medical professionals, public health experts say, the Chinese government lost one of its best chances to keep the disease from becoming an epidemic,” the paper reports.
According to Reuters, Chinese authorities also assured citizens in the days after the virus had first been identified that it was not widely transmissible.
This advice came despite “the lack of reliable data and testing capacity in Wuhan” and meant “city managers had little incentive to escalate problems to political superiors”, the news agency reports.
At the same time, the Chinese government also “censored negative online commentary about the situation, and arrested eight people it accused of being ‘rumour spreaders’”.
Why was the response delayed?
According to the Financial Times: “Part of the reason for the tightly controlled release of information was that Wuhan, a provincial capital, was hosting annual meetings of the top municipal and provincial officials from January 7 to 17.”
Dali Yang, an expert on Chinese bureaucracy at the University of Chicago, told the FT that the conference was a “major factor” in authorities attempts to “project an air of calm and most likely delayed taking action to stop the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus”.
“Local and central government officials are facing a growing wave of public anger over the handling of the new coronavirus,” reports The Guardian.
“On Sunday, state media reported that 337 party officials in Hubei had been ‘punished’, including six county-level officials who had been fired.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
William Gritten is a London-born, New York-based strategist and writer focusing on politics and international affairs.
-
Myanmar: the Spring Revolution and the downfall of the generals
Talking Point An armed protest movement has swept across the country since the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi was overthrown in 2021
By The Week Staff Published
-
Israel hits Iran with retaliatory airstrike
Speed Read The attack comes after Iran's drone and missile barrage last weekend
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Is there a peaceful way forward for Israel and Iran?
Today's Big Question Tehran has initially sought to downplay the latest Israeli missile strike on its territory
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Sudan on brink of collapse after a year of war
Speed Read 18 million people face famine as the country continues its bloody downward spiral
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How powerful is Iran?
Today's big question Islamic republic is facing domestic dissent and 'economic peril' but has a vast military, dangerous allies and a nuclear threat
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US, Israel brace for Iran retaliatory strikes
Speed Read An Iranian attack on Israel is believed to be imminent
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How green onions could swing South Korea's election
The Explainer Country's president has fallen foul of the oldest trick in the campaign book, not knowing the price of groceries
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Ukraine's battle to save Kharkiv from Putin's drones
The Explainer Country's second-largest city has been under almost daily attacks since February amid claims Russia wants to make it uninhabitable
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published