US election 2020: how Facebook is set to ‘curb foreign interference’
Social media platform will ban foreign political adverts - but won’t silence Donald Trump
Facebook has pledged to combat foreign meddling in US elections by introducing new policies aimed at stopping the spread of fake news on the social media platform.
Foreign states and state-controlled organisations will be banned from placing political adverts, and paid-for content will be labelled with the identity of its source.
The California-based company says that users will also be able to turn off all social issue, electoral and political ads “so that they don’t see them in their feed – not just in the US but globally from the autumn”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The new strategy follows widespread criticism of Facebook “for allowing Russian interference in the 2016 election and doing too little to stop the dissemination of misinformation by its users”, says The Times.
The move is also believed to be aimed at pre-empting a directive from the Department of Justice that could force social media companies to police content on their platforms more effectively.
However, Facebook has resisted calls to follow Twitter’s lead in fact-checking posts by high-profile political figures including Donald Trump, even though many experts say the US president’s false claims about state voting procedures “constitutes a form of voter suppression”, according to The Guardian.
The company’s new strategy is outlined in an article by founder Mark Zuckerberg (pictured top) in USA Today and by Nick Clegg, Facebook’s head of global affairs and communication, in a comment piece for The Telegraph.
Speaking to the BBC’s Today programme, former deputy prime minister Clegg said that while Trump’s posts had at times been “abhorrent”, the social media giant would do nothing to censor his online comments.
The “best way to hold politicians to account…is to make sure people can hear what they say”, Clegg said.
But many commentators in both the US and the UK insist that Facebook should be doing more.
“There is a lot more it should be doing, and its policies remain much weaker than those adopted by Google and Twitter,” writes Damian Collins MP, former chair of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee (DCMS), in The Telegraph.
“When we look at the specifics of the new policies that Facebook has announced, there are some positive changes, but they fall short of addressing the fundamental problems.”
Civil rights organisations are calling for a boycott of advertising on Facebook, saying the platform has done little to stop the promotion of “hate, bigotry, racism, antisemitism and violence”, reports The Times.
And former US vice president and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has written an open letter to Facebook calling for the company to “proactively stem the tide of false information by no longer amplifying untrustworthy content and promptly fact-checking election-related material that goes viral”.
“Fundamentally not enough has changed, but other companies are now starting to take steps to act against harmful disinformation that they won’t,” concludes Collins in The Telegraph.
“If you were a bad actor wishing sow division and confusion with campaigns of fear and lies, Facebook would be your social media platform of choice.”
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial subscription today –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'The House under GOP rule has become a hostile workplace'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
The Shohei Ohtani gambling scandal is about more than bad bets
In The Spotlight The firestorm surrounding one of baseball's biggest stars threatens to upend a generational legacy and professional sports at large
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Feds raid Diddy homes in alleged sex trafficking case
Speed Read Homeland Security raided the properties of hip hop mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Cyberflashing, fake news and the new crimes in the Online Safety Act
The Explainer UK's first conviction demonstrates scope of controversial law that critics describe as a threat to privacy and free speech
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
TikTok predicts 'creative bravery' trends for 2024
talking point Will it be a banner year for the platform, or will it isolate its biggest audience?
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Elon Musk's 'frivolous' but precedent-setting free speech fight with Media Matters
Talking Point The lawsuit is just the latest in Musk's ongoing tension with social media watchdogs
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Twitter's year of Elon Musk: what happens next?
Why Everyone's Talking About 'Your platform is dying', says one commentator, but new CEO is aiming for profitability next year
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
How AI might influence democracy in 2024
The Explainer Threat from bots and deepfakes stalks key elections around the world next year
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Pros and cons of social media content moderation
Pros and Cons Where do you draw the line between online safety and freedom of speech?
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Turns out Facebook isn't as polarizing as previously thought
Talking Point New studies show that, contrary to prior belief, the algorithm has little effect on driving polarization
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Mark Zuckerberg vs. Elon Musk: a tale of the tech tape
Under the Radar The two men challenged each other to a fight after years of sniping
By Justin Klawans Published