Could more people die from lockdown than from coronavirus?
Government report warns that healthcare delays and economic impact of pandemic may lead to up to 200,000 deaths
Tens of thousands more people could die from the effects of the Covid lockdown and efforts to protect the NHS than from the virus itself, according to a newly revealed government report.
Experts say that healthcare delays and the economic fallout of the coronavirus could result in up to 200,000 deaths - a prediction likely to fuel “debate over the easing of lockdown restrictions”, says The Telegraph.
Some politicians have argued that it is too early to lift lockdown measures, while others “have questioned whether the cure is worse than the disease”, the newspaper reports.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What does the report say?
Published in April by experts from the Department of Health, the Office of National Statistics (ONS), the government’s Actuary Department and the Home Office, the report said that to 25,000 people could die from delaying treatment for non-coronavirus-related illnesses in the first six months of the pandemic, with a further 185,000 dying in the medium to long term.
Patrick Vallance, the government’s chief scientific advisor, revealed the existence of the report while appearing before the Commons Science and Technology Select Committee last week.
The report also warned of a predicted 500 more suicides during the first wave of infections, and between 600 and 12,000 more deaths per year due to the impact of a recession caused by the economic ramifications of lockdown.
Deaths owing to accidents in the home and domestic violence were expected to increase too.
In total, around quarter of a million people would die due to the country’s response to the coronavirus, rather than the pandemic itself, the experts predicted.
Has lockdown led to more illness?
An analysis published in April by experts at University College London (UCL) revealed that urgent referrals from GPs for suspected cancer had dropped by an average of 76% during lockdown.
The researchers predicted that total cancer deaths could rise from 89,576 to 107,491 in just one year as a result of the pandemic.
Thousands of strokes and heart attacks also went untreated during lockdown, and early diagnoses of diabetes and kidney disease were missed, the Daily Mail reports.
University of Oxford researchers revealed last week that 5,000 fewer heart attack patients had attended hospital between March and May.
And the new government report has added further “credence to the view that patients with serious illnesses unrelated to coronavirus have been neglected” during the Covid crisis, says the newspaper.
Is the cure worse than the disease?
Many lockdown sceptics point to the millions of jobs lost around the world, the warning of a “recession to end all recessions”, and the Bank of England’s fear that the British economy is facing its worst crash in three centuries.
The case against locking down has been made repeatedly by right-wing politicians and conservative news outlets. US President Donald Trump railed against lockdown in late March, telling Fox News: “You’re going to lose more people by putting a country into a massive recession or depression.”
His Brazilian counterpart Jair Bolsonaro said in May that economic stagnation would hurt Brazil more than the virus, calling governors and mayors who had initiated local lockdowns “a terrible disgrace”.
Did lockdown damage the economy?
Attributing economic slowdown to the lockdown rather than the virus itself is simply false, says Oxford economics profession Simon Wren-Lewis in an article for The Guardian.
“Conservative MPs seem to think the collapse in output is due to the lockdown, whereas in reality it is due to the pandemic. If there had been no lockdown, and the epidemic had run its course unhindered, we would have seen a fall in output of similar size.”
Many commentators point to Sweden as evidence of this claim. The Scandinavian country opted not to lock down, arguing that taking such “draconian measures” was not sustainable and would harm the economy unnecessarily. However, Sweden has ended up suffering significantly more deaths than its Scandinavian neighbours, with little economic gain.
“They literally gained nothing,” Jacob Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington told The New York Times. “It’s a self-inflicted wound, and they have no economic gains.”
The government’s focus going forward should be on ridding the UK of coronavirus rather than continuing to ease lockdown, says Wren-Lewis.
“If we continue to put ending the lockdown above bringing infection levels down,” the “grim reality” of “a deeper and longer recession” will only become more likely, he concludes.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Arion McNicoll is a freelance writer at The Week Digital and was previously the UK website’s editor. He has also held senior editorial roles at CNN, The Times and The Sunday Times. Along with his writing work, he co-hosts “Today in History with The Retrospectors”, Rethink Audio’s flagship daily podcast, and is a regular panellist (and occasional stand-in host) on “The Week Unwrapped”. He is also a judge for The Publisher Podcast Awards.
-
Today's political cartoons - April 15, 2024
Cartoons Monday's cartoons - flamingos in flight, taxes, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Empty-nest boomers aren't selling their big homes
Speed Read Most Americans 60 and older do not intend to move, according to a recent survey
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Trump's first criminal trial starts with jury picks
Speed Read The former president faces charges related to hush money payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Covid four years on: have we got over the pandemic?
Today's Big Question Brits suffering from both lockdown nostalgia and collective trauma that refuses to go away
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
The hollow classroom
Opinion Remote school let kids down. It will take much more than extra tutoring for kids to recover.
By Mark Gimein Published
-
Excess screen time is making children only see what is in front of them
Under the radar The future is looking blurry. And very nearsighted.
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Covid-19: what to know about UK's new Juno and Pirola variants
in depth Rapidly spreading new JN.1 strain is 'yet another reminder that the pandemic is far from over'
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Long-term respiratory illness is here to stay
The Explainer Covid is not the only disease with a long version
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Covid inquiry: the most important questions for Boris Johnson
Talking Point Former PM has faced weeks of heavy criticism from former colleagues at the public hearing
By The Week Staff Published
-
China's pneumonia cases: should we be worried?
The Explainer Experts warn against pushing 'pandemic panic button' following outbreak of respiratory illness
By Keumars Afifi-Sabet, The Week UK Published
-
Vallance diaries: Boris Johnson 'bamboozled' by Covid science
Speed Read Then PM struggled to get his head around key terms and stats, chief scientific advisor claims
By The Week UK Published