In Brief

Coronavirus: age cap in Oxford vaccine trials casts doubt over results

AstraZeneca failed to disclose that under-55s made up test group in which jab was most effective

Oxford University and AstraZeneca are facing questions over their promising vaccine trial results after health officials revealed that key information about the ages of the test subjects was omitted.

During the Phase 3 trial, one group of test subjects was inoculated with two doses of the vaccine, spaced a month apart, while a second group was administered with a half-dose followed by a full one. In the first group, the protection rate was found to be 62%, but data from the second group showed that the vaccine was effective 90% of the time.

The reason for the wide discrepency has puzzled scientists. But they may now have their answer, after researcher Moncef Slaoui, who is spearheading the US’s vaccine distribution programme, told reporters that the age of participants in the second group “was capped at 55”, Bloomberg reports.

No age breakdown was given in the reporting of the results, which have been cast into doubt over the omission of the most at-risk age demographics.

Former Pfizer research and development president Geoffrey Porges researchers “said he thought it was unlikely the AstraZeneca jab would get approval in the US after the company ‘tried to embellish their results’ by highlighting higher efficacy in a ‘relatively small subset of subjects in the study’”, the Financial Times reports.

Meanwhile, David Salisbury, an associate fellow of the global health programme at Chatham House, told The Telegraph: “You’ve taken two studies for which different doses were used and come up with a composite that doesn’t represent either of the doses. I think many people are having trouble with that.”

And the admission earlier this week by AstraZeneca that the half-dose was administered by error during the trials will add to “questions about whether the vaccine’s apparently spectacular efficacy will hold up under additional testing”, says The New York Times - which suggests that AstraZeneca’s “spotty disclosures have eroded confidence” in the jab.

Recommended

Covid-19: everything you need to know about coronavirus
coronavirus.jpg
Coronavirus

Covid-19: everything you need to know about coronavirus

Indian Wells tennis cancelled - is Wimbledon in danger?
Novak Djokovic kisses the winner’s trophy after beating Roger Federer in the Wimbledon final
In Brief

Indian Wells tennis cancelled - is Wimbledon in danger?

Coronavirus impact on sport: ‘serious concerns’ for Olympics
Officials at the Japan Coast Guard base in Yokohama where a cruise ship is in quarantine following an outbreak of coronavirus
In Brief

Coronavirus impact on sport: ‘serious concerns’ for Olympics

Is social media bad for your mental health?
171220-facebook.jpg
In Depth

Is social media bad for your mental health?

Popular articles

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 27 Jan 2021
10 Downing Street
Daily Briefing

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 27 Jan 2021

Best TV crime dramas to watch in 2021
Line of Duty series six returns to BBC One in 2021
In Depth

Best TV crime dramas to watch in 2021

What do Covid vaccines cost - and who is paying over the odds?
People wait to be vaccinated at Salisbury Cathedral
Getting to grips with . . .

What do Covid vaccines cost - and who is paying over the odds?

Free 6 issue trial then continue to