In Depth

Justine Greening says grammar schools must do more for 'ordinary working families'

Labour accuse Education Secretary of 'cooking the books' in argument for selective schools

Justine Greening says a new generation of grammar schools must do more to increase intake from "ordinary working families".

Speaking at St Mary’s University in Twickenham, the Education Secretary said the government was planning a new "model" for selective schools that would be "truly open for all".

She added: "To be clear, this isn't about creating brand new labels for our families and our children. It isn't about singling out some for support whilst leaving others alone.

"But we do want to start to provide a clearer analysis of the situation, of how the children of ordinary working people are faring in our education system and for measuring how our wider reforms can do better for these families – and so better for the country."

Government figures show more than 50 per cent of grammar school pupils are from families with above-average incomes and fewer than one in ten come from the most disadvantaged backgrounds.

Labour argues this is evidence that grammar schools do not support social mobility.

Greening was speaking as the Department for Education launched a consultation exercise to "better understand the needs of ordinary working families", which it defines as those living on "modest incomes", rather than the poorest families.

It "amounts to the first attempt by ministers to define the 'just about managing families' May had said her government would champion", says The Guardian

According to the Daily Telegraph, the phrase "ordinary working families" denotes "families which are not captured by traditional measures of deprivation but whose household income is below the national average."

But the government's definition of has come under attack, with the Daily Mirror saying it "excludes the more than 13 per cent of secondary school pupils eligible for free school meals".

The Guardian agrees, saying the government "has managed to come up with a definition of ordinary working people that excludes the very poor but covers a third of children, most of whom will be living in the Conservative-voting constituencies rather than the Labour inner cities".

Shadow education secretary Angela Rayner said the government’s definition was a way of hiding the full picture.

She said: "In effect, they have not been able to find the evidence to back up their ideological policy, so they’ve created some themselves, they’ve cooked the books."

Adam Bienkov of Business Insider also criticised the plan, saying: "There is simply no way to argue that grammar schools improve social mobility without ignoring the statistics and relying solely on anecdotes.

"Greening has a solution to this problem - simply ignore the poorest children."

Recommended

How safe are smart motorways?
Smart motorways
In Depth

How safe are smart motorways?

Are we facing ‘apocalypse’ of ‘black swan’ events?
Queue for fuel at motorway station
Getting to grips with . . .

Are we facing ‘apocalypse’ of ‘black swan’ events?

How Labour’s cervix problem began
Labour leader Keir Starmer arrives at the Hilton Brighton Metropole hotel on the opening day of the Labour Party conference
Why we’re talking about . . .

How Labour’s cervix problem began

‘Army will be sent in’
Today's newspaper front pages
Today’s newspapers

‘Army will be sent in’

Popular articles

Doctor says we should not sleep naked because of flatulent spraying
The feet of a person sleeping in a bed
Tall Tales

Doctor says we should not sleep naked because of flatulent spraying

Penguins ‘might be aliens’
Penguins
Tall Tales

Penguins ‘might be aliens’

The man tasked with putting a price on 9/11’s lost lives
Kenneth Feinberg at a Congressional hearing
Profile

The man tasked with putting a price on 9/11’s lost lives

The Week Footer Banner