Fact Check: Are far-right groups the biggest US terror threat?
In Depth: New Jersey senator claims white nationalists behind majority of attacks since 9/11
US Senator Cory Booker has reignited the debate on domestic terrorism by claiming that white nationalist groups are more dangerous than Islamist militants.
The New Jersey Democrat criticised the Trump administration for allegedly ignoring the threat posed by far-right extremists, whom he says are behind the majority of attacks since 9/11.
Conservative pundits have hit back, accusing Booker of relying on “dubious” data to support his own “attack” on the White House.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
So who’s right? The Week examines the facts behind the senator’s claims.
What exactly did Booker say?
Speaking during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last week, Booker accused the Department of Homeland Security of focusing solely on terror attacks plotted by Islamist radicals, while turning a blind eye to the threat of far-right extremism.
“In American history since 9/11, we’ve had 85 major attacks in our country, 73% of them have been by white nationalist hate groups against minorities, against Muslims, against others,” he said.
The senator’s spokesperson said he was citing numbers from an April 2017 report by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) on countering violent terrorism, according to fact-checking site PolitiFact.
What do others say?
Scott Greer, deputy editor of the conservative Daily Caller website, accuses Booker of using misleading figures.
“When you look closer at the data, the picture isn’t as clear-cut as [Booker] would have us believe,” Greer writes, adding that there were “serious issues” with the report.
“It is interesting that Booker went with the 73% figure from the study instead of the number of people killed by white supremacists,” Greer says. “The GAO reports that while right-wing extremists were responsible for more incidents, Islamists killed more people on American soil.”
The head of the FBI has previously said that white supremacists and Islamist extremists pose an equal threat to national security.
“We take both of them very, very seriously,” FBI director Christopher Wray said in September. “Our focus is on violence and threats of violence against the people of this country. That’s our concern – it’s not ideology.”
What are the facts?
The report Booker cited found that from 12 September 2001 to the end of 2016, there were 85 deadly attacks in the US by violent extremists, resulting in a total of 225 deaths.
Of those deaths, 106 people were killed by far-right extremists, in 62 separate attacks, while 119 people were killed by Islamist extremists, in 23 separate incidents.
So while the majority (73%) of the attacks were carried out by far-right extremists, more people were killed by Islamist terrorists.
However, as Politifact’s Amy Sherman points out, Booker used the term “white nationalists”, which is “not exactly the same thing” as far-right extremist groups.
The latter “are motivated by ideologies seeking an idealised future favouring a particular group”, says Sherman. “They include white supremacists and anti-government militias, among others.”
According to the GAO report, almost half the 85 attacks were committed by white supremacists.
But that “number could rise if we counted additional perpetrators who sympathised with white supremacist ideals but were not labelled as white supremacists by the GAO”, Sherman says.
Booker’s spokesperson explained the discrepancy in figures by arguing that although the report did not identify some of the perpetrators as white supremacists, other sources such as news accounts or court records showed they held white supremacist or racist views.
A deadly difference
Separate research carried out by the University of Maryland’s National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism reveals a slightly different picture.
It found that, during the same period as that cited by Booker, Islamist extremists carried out 31 attacks, leading to 119 deaths, while far-right extremists were responsible for killing 158 people, in 89 separate attacks.
So while both sources agree that far-right extremist attacks are far more common, they differ on the total number of deaths they have caused.
Whether Muslim or far-right extremists have killed more Americans “depends on how you measure such incidents and which source you use”, says Politico. “Sorting through attacks and placing them in the categories of terrorism, violent extremism or hate crimes can sometimes be extremely complicated.”
Who is right?
The evidence suggests that far-right groups are responsible for a higher number of attacks than Islamists extremists, but not necessarily more deaths.
It was misleading of Senator Booker to imply that white nationalist groups were behind the majority of attacks, as the figures he cited applied to far-right extremists as a whole.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The issue of women and conscription
Under the radar Ukraine military adviser hints at widening draft to women, as other countries weigh defence options amid global insecurity
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
AI is causing concern among the LGBTQ community
In the Spotlight One critic believes that AI will 'always fail LGBTQ people'
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
'Modern presidents exercise power undreamed of by the Founding Fathers'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Gaza hospital blast: What the video evidence shows about who's to blame
Speed Read Nobody wants to take responsibility for the deadly explosion in the courtyard of Gaza's al-Ahli Hospital. Roll the tape.
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Fact check: are US migrant detention centres really concentration camps?
In Depth Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez stands by her controversial claim
By Gabriel Power Last updated
-
Fact check: who’s to blame for the violence in Zimbabwe?
In Depth President Emmerson Mnangagwa claims opposition fuelled deadly protests
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Fact check: how do charities spend your money?
In Depth The Week investigates what percentage of donations goes directly to those in need
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The truth about decriminalising prostitution
In Depth Does removing all criminal sanctions make the sex industry more or less safe for its workers?
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Fact Check: The truth about public support for Syria air strikes
In Depth The Week looks at the polls before and after attacks were launched by Britain, France and the US
By The Week Staff Published
-
Fact Check: Would a visa-free Africa break down colonial-era borders?
In Depth In Depth: can the African Union keep its promise to abolish travel restrictions?
By The Week Staff Published
-
Fact Check: Has Islamic State really been defeated?
In Depth The terrorist group’s caliphate may have collapsed, but experts warn the war is far from won
By The Week Staff Last updated