Queen ‘used royal consent rule’ to lobby for law change to hide her wealth
Monarch’s private lawyers dispatched to put pressure on civil servants involved in drafting new legislation
The Queen successfully lobbied ministers to change a proposed law in the 1970s in order to hide her “embarrassing” private wealth from public scrutiny, newly unearthed documents reveal.
Official memos dredged up from the National Archives by The Guardian reveal that the monarch’s private lawyer put pressure on civil servants to prevent her shareholdings from being made public under proposed transparency measures in a companies bill drafted by Edward Heath’s Conservative government.
Matthew Farrer, then a partner at London-based law firm Farrer & Co., “relayed the Queen’s objection that the law would reveal her private investments in listed companies, as well as their value”, the paper reports.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A civil servant called C.M. Drukker wrote on 9 November that Farrer had argued that the disclosure would be “embarrassing” to the Queen.
The lawyer had “emphasised that the problem was taken very seriously and suggested - somewhat tentatively - that we had put them into this quandary and must therefore find a way out”, according to Drukker.
The government subsequently inserted a clause into the legislation granting itself the power to excuse companies used by “heads of state” from the new transparency measures.
What is Queen’s Consent?
A Buckingham Palace spokesperson last night insisted that claims the Queen blocked legislation are “simply incorrect”, the BBC reports.
In response, The Guardian’s investigations editor Paul Lewis tweeted that the paper did not allege that the monarch had “blocked legislation” but rather that “she lobbied ministers to change a law to conceal her wealth”.
The memos at the centre of the row came to light during an investigation into the Royals’ use of an arcane parliamentary procedure called Queen’s Consent.
The Royal Family’s website describes Queen’s Consent as a “long-established convention” by which the Queen is “asked by Parliament to provide consent… for the debating of bills which would affect the prerogative or interests of the Crown”.
Constitutional scholars have “tended to regard consent as an opaque but harmless example of the pageantry that surrounds the monarchy”, says The Guardian. But the memos suggest that the Queen’s advance sight of bills “has enabled her to secretly lobby for legislative changes”, the paper adds.
As calls emerge for a rethink of the archaic rule, Buckingham Palace insisted that “the role of sovereign is purely formal” and that “consent is always granted by the monarch where requested by government”.
A spokesperson added: “If consent is required, draft legislation is, by convention, put to the sovereign to grant solely on advice of ministers and as a matter of public record.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
Why are people and elephants fighting in Sri Lanka?
Under The Radar Farmers encroaching into elephant habitats has led to deaths on both sides
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Indie film's 'very brief' use of AI sparks backlash and calls for boycotts
Talking Points Did the creators of a new horror movie make a deal with the artificial intelligence devil?
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Could Taylor Swift swing the election?
Today's Big Question The pop star has outsized influence — and that extends beyond the music industry
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold Published
-
'Manipulated' photo of UK's Princess Kate spiked
speed read The first official image of Kate Middleton since January has been retracted
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Modern royal scandals from around the world
The Explainer From Spain to the UAE, royal families have often been besieged by negative events
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The Regency Acts: what happens if King Charles can't perform his duties
The Explainer Monarch's responsibilities could be carried out by a regent or the counsellors of state
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
King Charles diagnosed with cancer
Speed Read Monarch 'remains wholly positive about his treatment', during which senior royals are expected to stand in for him
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Princess of Wales to remain in hospital for two weeks as King prepares for prostate treatment
Speed Read The timing of the two royal medical announcements was said to be an 'unavoidable coincidence'
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Crown Prince Frederik and Crown Princess Mary: a guide to Denmark's next king and queen
Why everyone's talking about Queen Margrethe II is stepping down after 52 years on Denmark's throne
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
King laughs about his 'sausage fingers' in new documentary
Speed Read Charles's ample digits have long attracted 'attention and concern' but he is often the 'first to poke fun'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Prince Harry: judge rules 'extensive' phone hacking carried out by Mirror Group papers
Speed Read High Court rules in Duke's favour as he urges police investigation, claiming editors lied under oath at Leveson Inquiry
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published