Getting to grips with . . .

What Meghan Markle’s court win means for Royal Family - and the media

High Court judge rules that newspaper invaded Duchess of Sussex’s privacy by publishing personal letter to her estranged father

Meghan and Harry Ch

The Duchess of Sussex has welcomed her “comprehensive win” in a High Court privacy case against The Mail on Sunday that pundits say has major implications for the Royal Family.

In a statement following the ruling yesterday, Meghan Markle said that the paper’s publisher Associated Newspapers had to be held accountable for its “illegal and dehumanising practices” in publishing extracts of a letter that she had written to her estranged father, Thomas Markle.

As The Telegraph’s Camilla Tominey notes, “members of the House of Windsor have long argued that they reserve the right to a private life despite having to endure more intrusion than the rest of us”. 

And “in ruling that being a Royal does not make 'one' public property, Mr Justice Warby has undoubtedly chalked up a significant gain not only for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex but also for the Royal Family as a whole”.

The Duchess’ court victory comes weeks after her former Army officer husband accepted an apology and “substantial damages” over articles in The Mail on Sunday and MailOnline that alleged Prince Harry had “turned his back” on the Royal Marines.

The legal wins highlight “the significant freedoms the couple now enjoy outside the Royal Family”, says  ITV News, and serve “as a warning shot to media outlets” that “as private individuals” they “will not hesitate to litigate when they feel wronged”.

But “many might be alarmed by the precedent this sets for press freedom, as Thomas Markle effectively ‘leaked’ his daughter’s letter to the newspaper”, the broadcaster adds.

Legal commentator Joshua Rozenberg warns that gone are the days of ‘publish and be damned’.

This week’s ruling “reinforces” privacy laws without changing them, Rozenberg writes in an article for The Telegraph. “There will still be cases where a newspaper’s freedom of expression outweighs a letter-writer’s right to privacy – especially if the writer is a public figure.”

But, he adds, “this was not one of them”.

Recommended

‘There are already many caveats on our freedoms in the name of collective safety’
A vaccination centre in London
Instant Opinion

‘There are already many caveats on our freedoms in the name of collective safety’

How many people need to be vaccinated against Covid to get life back to normal?
Margaret Keenan becomes the first patient in the UK to receive the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine
In Focus

How many people need to be vaccinated against Covid to get life back to normal?

Why half of the UK’s police stations have closed in past decade
A closed police station in Hackney
In Brief

Why half of the UK’s police stations have closed in past decade

Race to track down UK patient infected with Brazil Covid strain
A traveller leaves the Heathrow Radisson Blu after completing the quarantine period
The latest on . . .

Race to track down UK patient infected with Brazil Covid strain

Popular articles

Best TV crime dramas to watch in 2021
Line of Duty series six returns to BBC One in 2021
In Depth

Best TV crime dramas to watch in 2021

Quiz of The Week
Boris Johnson chairs a session of the UN Security Council
Quizzes and puzzles

Quiz of The Week

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 1 March 2021
10 Downing Street
Daily Briefing

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 1 March 2021