In Brief

Is this the end of austerity?

Government public sector pay rise labelled ‘derisory’ amid fears it could be funded by further cuts

Unions have condemned the government’s much-vaunted public sector pay rises as “derisory” amid fears extra money for workers will mean government cuts in other areas.

A million public sector workers received their first pay increase above 1% since 2013, when the pay cap replaced a complete pay freeze brought in in 2010 by the then-chancellor George Osborne as part of the Coalition’s austerity programme.

Teachers, prison officers, members of the armed forces, doctors and dentists will be given rises of between 1 and 4%, backdated to April, the start of the financial year.

Reuters says the announcement, which was rushed through before Parliament’s summer recess began, was an attempt by Theresa May “to regain momentum after a rocky few weeks of Brexit drama”.

But The Times reports that there is no new money coming from the Treasury to fund the rises, “meaning that the relevant departments will fund them from within their existing budgets”.

This has led to fears that other government services or jobs could be cut to fund the pay rises.

Unions have widely condemned the pay increase, pointing out that some of the consolidated figures, which don’t include bonuses and perks, are below the current 2.4% rate of inflation.

The Police Federation said officers’ pay had fallen by about 18% since 2009-10 and the rise would be just £2.50 a week extra for a constable at the start of their career.

The federation’s vice-chair, Che Donald, said: “Today’s derisory announcement flies in the face of a lot of hot air spouted by the Home Office and government over the past few months. In reality this pay award is an insult to those who serve day in, day out.”

The British Medical Association (BMA) expressed similar sentiments, while Christina McAnea, assistant general secretary at the Unison union, telling The Guardian: “Behind the good news headlines, the government is simply robbing Peter to pay Paul”.

It comes as a Resolution Foundation report revealed millions of families are worse off than they were 15 years ago.

Research has indicted that low-income families are actually earning £100 less a year today than they were in 2003, even with figures adjusted for inflation and housing costs.

“The remarkable income stagnation for so many reveals that the economy has been failing to generate income for people over many years despite record levels of people in work” says the BBC’s economics editor Kamal Ahmed.

Recommended

Are Royal aides out to sink Meghan Markle - or is she really a ‘bully’?
Harry and Meghan Markle
Today’s big question

Are Royal aides out to sink Meghan Markle - or is she really a ‘bully’?

‘Never before have all the main engines of European integration caught fire simultaneously’
Angela Merkel and Ursula von der Leyen in the European Parliament
Instant Opinion

‘Never before have all the main engines of European integration caught fire simultaneously’

How many people need to be vaccinated against Covid to get life back to normal?
Margaret Keenan becomes the first patient in the UK to receive the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine
In Focus

How many people need to be vaccinated against Covid to get life back to normal?

Five things we learned from Sturgeon’s testimony to Salmond inquiry
Nicola Sturgeon gives evidence to a Scottish Parliament committee
Why we’re talking about . . .

Five things we learned from Sturgeon’s testimony to Salmond inquiry

Popular articles

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 1 March 2021
10 Downing Street
Daily Briefing

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 1 March 2021

Best TV crime dramas to watch in 2021
Line of Duty series six returns to BBC One in 2021
In Depth

Best TV crime dramas to watch in 2021

Are Harry and Meghan pushing it with their request for press privacy?
Harry and Meghan
The latest on . . .

Are Harry and Meghan pushing it with their request for press privacy?