In Brief

Is this the end of austerity?

Government public sector pay rise labelled ‘derisory’ amid fears it could be funded by further cuts

Unions have condemned the government’s much-vaunted public sector pay rises as “derisory” amid fears extra money for workers will mean government cuts in other areas.

A million public sector workers received their first pay increase above 1% since 2013, when the pay cap replaced a complete pay freeze brought in in 2010 by the then-chancellor George Osborne as part of the Coalition’s austerity programme.

Teachers, prison officers, members of the armed forces, doctors and dentists will be given rises of between 1 and 4%, backdated to April, the start of the financial year.

Reuters says the announcement, which was rushed through before Parliament’s summer recess began, was an attempt by Theresa May “to regain momentum after a rocky few weeks of Brexit drama”.

But The Times reports that there is no new money coming from the Treasury to fund the rises, “meaning that the relevant departments will fund them from within their existing budgets”.

This has led to fears that other government services or jobs could be cut to fund the pay rises.

Unions have widely condemned the pay increase, pointing out that some of the consolidated figures, which don’t include bonuses and perks, are below the current 2.4% rate of inflation.

The Police Federation said officers’ pay had fallen by about 18% since 2009-10 and the rise would be just £2.50 a week extra for a constable at the start of their career.

The federation’s vice-chair, Che Donald, said: “Today’s derisory announcement flies in the face of a lot of hot air spouted by the Home Office and government over the past few months. In reality this pay award is an insult to those who serve day in, day out.”

The British Medical Association (BMA) expressed similar sentiments, while Christina McAnea, assistant general secretary at the Unison union, telling The Guardian: “Behind the good news headlines, the government is simply robbing Peter to pay Paul”.

It comes as a Resolution Foundation report revealed millions of families are worse off than they were 15 years ago.

Research has indicted that low-income families are actually earning £100 less a year today than they were in 2003, even with figures adjusted for inflation and housing costs.

“The remarkable income stagnation for so many reveals that the economy has been failing to generate income for people over many years despite record levels of people in work” says the BBC’s economics editor Kamal Ahmed.

Recommended

Why sewage is causing a political stink
A dead fish by the Thames
Getting to grips with . . .

Why sewage is causing a political stink

Covid case slump hopes: why is Downing Street resisting Plan B?
Health Secretary Sajid Javid
Getting to grips with . . .

Covid case slump hopes: why is Downing Street resisting Plan B?

Everything you need to know about Covid booster vaccines
An NHS health worker administers a dose of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine
Fact file

Everything you need to know about Covid booster vaccines

‘Resign!’: what are the rules on leaking government budgets?
Rishi Sunak
Today’s big question

‘Resign!’: what are the rules on leaking government budgets?

Popular articles

Insulate Britain: what do they want?
Insulate Britain protesters
Profile

Insulate Britain: what do they want?

What is blackfishing?
Shot of Jesy Nelson with her hair in braids
In Depth

What is blackfishing?

Why a ‘super-cold’ is spreading
flu_sneeze.jpg
Getting to grips with . . .

Why a ‘super-cold’ is spreading

The Week Footer Banner