Why we’re talking about . . .

G7’s ‘seismic’ tax deal: what will it mean for the world’s biggest companies?

Proposed minimum global level of corporate tax will target multinationals and tech giants

The G7 group of wealthy nations struck a deal at the weekend that would create a global minimum corporate tax rate of at least 15% and make the world’s largest multinational companies pay more tax in each country they operate in. 

Finance ministers met in London to discuss the tax reforms and the UK’s Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak hailed the agreement as “seismic” and “truly historic”. 

The deal announced between the US, UK, France, Germany, Canada, Italy, Japan and the EU could see “billions of dollars flow to governments to pay off debts incurred during the Covid crisis”, the BBC reports. And according to estimates from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) as much as $81bn (£57bn) in additional tax revenues each year would be raised under the reforms. 

“A process has begun, a precedent has been set,” says the BBC’s economic editor Faisal Islam. “It may or may not end up being transformative, but this moment is historic.”

What has been agreed?

Under pillar one of the agreement, the “largest and most profitable multinationals will be required to pay tax in the countries where they operate - and not just where they have their headquarters”, the G7 said in a statement. The rules would apply to global firms with at least a 10% profit margin - and would see 20% of any profit above the 10% margin reallocated and then subjected to tax in the countries they operate.

Under pillar two, the G7 also agreed to the principle of at least 15% global minimum corporation tax operated on a country by country basis, “creating a more level playing field for UK firms and cracking down on tax avoidance”. Corporation tax in the UK is already 19% and is set to rise to 25% by 2023 in response to spending during the pandemic, the BBC reports. 

OECD estimates that pillar one would generate between $5bn (£3.5bn) and $12bn (£8.4bn), while pillar two, the global minimum rate, would collect between $42bn (£29.6bn) and $70bn (£49.4bn). However, this assumed that a global minimum rate of 12.5% would be applied under pillar two, The Guardian says. 

Which companies will be affected?

The world’s biggest companies will be forced to pay more tax in countries where they do business as well as where they are headquartered. The Biden administration suggests about 100 multinationals could fall under pillar one but it is not clear how many are caught by the London agreement. 

Online tech giants such as Amazon, Google and Facebook will also be caught by the agreement and the EU Tax Observatory analysis indicates it would also catch companies such as oil giants BP, Shell, Iberdrola and Repsol, mining firm Anglo American, telecoms firm BT, and banks such as HSBC, Barclays and Santander. 

What about Amazon and its cloud-computing business?

Amazon could evade the new rules because its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%, The Guardian says. This would be an “embarrassment for European negotiators seeking to extract more from big US tech companies”. 

However, finance ministers are “plotting a raid” on Amazon’s cloud-computing business (Amazon Web Services) to ensure it pays more corporate tax under the new G7 deal, the FT reports. 

The company appears to fall outside the 10% profit margin threshold set by the G7, but according to a source briefed on the discussions, the OECD is “exploring a special measure to treat Amazon’s cloud-computing division as a separate entity”. This measure would ensure that Amazon pays more tax in European countries such as France, Germany, the UK and Italy.

How have the big tech companies reacted?

The world’s biggest tech companies signaled approval to the G7 tax reform, Business Insider reports. An Amazon spokesperson said “we believe an OECD-led process that creates a multilateral solution will help bring stability to the international tax system” and the G7 agreement “marks a welcome step forward in the effort to achieve this goal”. 

A Google spokesperson told Reuters that “we strongly support the work being done to update international tax rules” while in an email to Business Insider Facebook’s vice president for global affairs Nick Clegg said the company “has long called for reform of the global tax rules and we welcome the important progress made at the G7”.

‘Deal does not going far enough’

The G7 agreement has been described as “historic” but campaigners have criticised the group for not going far enough. Aid charities believe it is too low and would not stop tax havens from operating, the BBC reports. 

“It’s absurd for the G7 to claim it is ‘overhauling’ a broken global tax system by setting up a global minimum corporate tax rate that is similar to the soft rates charged by tax havens like Ireland, Switzerland and Singapore,” said Gabriela Bucher, executive director of Oxfam. “They are setting the bar so low that companies can just step over it.”

What about tax avoidance? 

The deal is “certainly transformational”, says Ronen Palan, professor of international politics at the City University of London. “The only thing I am not sure about is, transformation from what to what?”.

Writing on The Conversation, he added: “Is it going to transform a system of taxation that was designed early in the 20th century and is simply not fit for purpose in the 21st? Or is it going to transform the techniques of tax avoidance, and give rise to a whole new suite of tax avoidance schemes? My gut feeling is the latter.”

What happens next? 

The “headline-grabbing” tax deal should be signed off at this week’s G7 meeting in Cornwall, the FT reports. And French economy minister Bruno Le Maire says it paves the way for a global accord at the G20 in Venice in July.

Much detail still needs to be ironed out but any final agreement could have “major repercussions for low-tax countries and tax havens”, Euronews says.

Singapore, a low-tax jurisdiction where several multinationals have regional headquarters, will change its tax system as needed “when a global consensus is reached”, Reuters reports. After the G7 agreed to back a minimum global corporate tax rate of at least 15%, experts said it could lead to a gradual phasing out of concessionary tax rates in Singapore - which has a rate of 17% but “provides incentives and schemes which reduce the effective rate”. 

Finance Minister Lawrence Wong said in a Facebook post that the new rules “should not inadvertently weaken the incentives for businesses to invest and innovate. Otherwise, countries will all be worse off, fighting over our share of a shrinking revenue pie”. 


Africa Cup of Nations: eight killed after stampede in Cameroon
The scene of the stampede at Olembe Stadium in Yaoundé, Cameroon 
The latest on . . .

Africa Cup of Nations: eight killed after stampede in Cameroon

A ‘gift’ for scammers: the true cost of furlough fraud
In Focus

A ‘gift’ for scammers: the true cost of furlough fraud

Nato vs. Russia: who would win a war?
Nato troops
In Depth

Nato vs. Russia: who would win a war?

How did nanoplastics end up at the North and South Pole?
Arctic ice blocks
In Depth

How did nanoplastics end up at the North and South Pole?

Popular articles

Is Bosnia on the brink of another civil war?
Bosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik
In Depth

Is Bosnia on the brink of another civil war?

Why is New Zealand shutting its borders again?
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern adjusts her face mask following a press conference
In Depth

Why is New Zealand shutting its borders again?

Djokovic vs. Nadal vs. Federer: career records and grand slams
Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer have all won 20 grand slam singles titles

Djokovic vs. Nadal vs. Federer: career records and grand slams

The Week Footer Banner