In Brief

Is Michael Gove right to outlaw electric shock collars for dogs?

Activists welcome the ban on electrified training devices in England, but others accuse Environment Secretary of a policy U-turn

The government has announced that electric shock collars for cats and dogs will be outlawed in England, a move that has prompted critics to accuse Environment Secretary Michael Gove of a dramatic reversal of policy.

Shock collars, which are often sold as training devices, can deliver “up to 6,000 volts of electricity or spray noxious chemicals to control animals’ behaviour”, reports the BBC.

Gove says this causes unacceptable “harm and suffering” to the animals. He is expected to reveal the move to ban the sale of the devices later this week after a public consultation overwhelmingly backed outlawing them, Metro says.

The paper says that use of the collars has already been banned in Wales. Earlier this year Scotland began moves to follow suit.

Animal charities, many of which campaigned for the ban, are welcoming the move.

Dr Rachel Casey, director of canine behaviour and research at the Dogs Trust, said: “Scientific research has demonstrated that electronic devices which deliver an aversive stimulus have a negative impact on dog welfare, so this ban will have a major positive impact for dogs in the UK.”

But proponents of the collars have hit out at what they describe as a “complete 180” by Gove, whose department said in February – in a letter obtained by the Press Association – there was “little research” to support a ban. 

The document, which was sent to the Royal Veterinary College, claimed that the scientific evidence that Gove’s department had commissioned was “not strong enough to support a ban”.

Dog trainer and campaigner Jamie Penrith told The Independent that Gove had made an “abrupt” decision. “It’s a complete 180,” Penrith said.

Ian Gregory, a lobbyist for pet collar manufacturers, argues that the collars help prevent some of the 300,000 deaths of cats in road accidents. He says that animal charities are exaggerating the impact of the shock delivered by collars, especially when compared to the legal practice of cattle-prodding.

“The anecdotal problems reported with pet collars can be resolved by product standards rather than by banning a proven technology,” he said.

“The hundreds of thousands of dog owners using remote trainers do not deserve to be criminalised.”

Recommended

Royal Marines ready for missions to ‘disrupt and confuse’ UK’s enemies
Royal Marines from 42 Commando take part in an exercise in Scotland
In Brief

Royal Marines ready for missions to ‘disrupt and confuse’ UK’s enemies

Top No. 10 aide slams ‘aloof’ and ‘risk averse’ civil service
The street sign for Whitehall
Behind the scenes

Top No. 10 aide slams ‘aloof’ and ‘risk averse’ civil service

Zero flu cases in UK as seasonal virus suppressed by Covid measures
Commuters wear face masks as they pass through Vauxhall underground station.
Getting to grips with . . .

Zero flu cases in UK as seasonal virus suppressed by Covid measures

‘One’s right as rein’
Today's newspaper front pages
Today’s newspapers

‘One’s right as rein’

Popular articles

Budget predictions: what will Rishi Sunak announce?
Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak poses with the Budget Box outside 11 Downing Street
Why we’re talking about . . .

Budget predictions: what will Rishi Sunak announce?

Best TV crime dramas to watch in 2021
Line of Duty series six returns to BBC One in 2021
In Depth

Best TV crime dramas to watch in 2021

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 26 Feb 2021
10 Downing Street
Daily Briefing

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 26 Feb 2021