Is the US withdrawal from Syria premature?
Donald Trump says Islamic State has been defeated, but defence officials want to maintain a US military presence in the region
To the surprise of his allies and the frustration of senior officials Donald Trump has decided to pull out all US troops from Syria, claiming Islamic State had been “defeated” and their job is done.
There are currently around 2,000 US troops on the ground in the war-torn country where they are primarily training local forces to combat Islamic State (IS). They have helped rid much of north-eastern Syria of the terrorist group, but pockets of fighters remain.
Nevertheless, “a complete, rapid withdrawal, if confirmed, would upend assumptions about a longer-term US military presence in Syria” reports Al Jazeera.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis and other senior US officials have advocated maintaining a US presence in the country.
Just a few days ago, Brett McGurk, Trump's special presidential envoy for the global coalition to defeat IS, said: “Nobody is saying that [IS fighters] are going to disappear. Nobody is that naive. So we want to stay on the ground and make sure that stability can be maintained in these areas.”
French President Emmanuel Macron had made it a national priority to persuade the US president to keep troops in Syria as a bulwark against an IS resurgence, and thought he had won the argument.
But it appears the temperamental US president has gone over the heads of his generals and made the decision to begin a “full” and “rapid” withdrawal from Syria, “taking allies and his own advisers by surprise”, says The Guardian.
It fulfils a long-standing desire to get out of Syria, but it could have significant ramifications for Washington’s Kurdish allies and for the region as a whole.
The New York Times says “Pentagon officials who had sought to talk the president out of the decision as late as Wednesday morning argued that such a move would betray Kurdish allies who have fought alongside American troops in Syria and who could find themselves under attack in a military offensive now threatened by Turkey”.
Turkey has said it was preparing to launch an operation against a US-backed Kurdish militia in northern Syria, something that risks confrontation with the US.
“Even though the US will continue to maintain troops in Iraq with the capability of launching strikes into Syria, a US withdrawal of ground forces would fulfill a major goal of Syria, Iran and Russia and risks diminishing US influence in the region,” say CNN’s Barbara Starr and Ryan Browne.
Trump’s own national security adviser, John Bolton, is adamantly opposed to withdrawing troops. At the UN general assembly in September he declared: “We’re not going to leave as long as Iranian troops are outside Iranian borders and that includes Iranian proxies and militias.”
“IS is well on the way to being defeated. Syria's President Assad remains in place. If the goal now is to contain Iran or Russia's rising influence in the region then 2,000 troops strung out across a vast swathe of territory may be too small a force to do this,” says BBC diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus.
“Their presence though does give the US 'skin in the game'. And many will see this decision as yet another indication of the chaos and uncertainty surrounding US policy towards this crucial region,” he writes.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Antony Gormley's Time Horizon – a 'judgmental army' of 100 cast-iron men
The Week Recommends Sculptures are 'everymen questioning the privilege of their surroundings' at the Norfolk stately home
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
'King's horses take free rein through London'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Is pop music now too reliant on gossip?
Talking Point Taylor Swift's new album has prompted a flurry of speculation over who she is referring to in her songs
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Will Iran risk all-out war with Israel?
Today's Big Question Tehran has not wanted to be directly involved in the Middle East conflict so far. But that could be about to change
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Why is Islamic State targeting Russia?
Today's Big Question Islamist terror group's attack on 'soft target' in Moscow was driven in part by 'opportunity and personnel'
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
How Islamic State bombings in Iran could escalate regional war
The Explainer Terrorist group claims responsibility for deadly blasts on 'irredeemable foe' but Tehran likely to ramp up anti-US rhetoric
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Israel-Hamas: which countries might be dragged into conflict?
Today's Big Question Experts fear a broader cross-border conflict in the region
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Turkey claims death of 3rd ISIS leader in 2 years
Speed Read
By Peter Weber Published
-
The deadly attacks on Syrian truffle hunters
feature Islamic State suspected of targeting Syrians risking their lives to secure much-needed income
By The Week Staff Published
-
U.S. strikes Iranian-linked targets in Syria after drone attack kills 1 U.S. contractor, wounds 6 others
Speed Read
By Peter Weber Published
-
Kansas woman sentenced to 20 years for leading Islamic State battalion
Speed Read
By Justin Klawans Published