University professor facing sack over spoof academic papers
Peter Boghossian’s bid to expose politically correct ‘nonsense’ included rewriting Mein Kampf with ‘feminist buzzwords’ thrown in
A university professor who sought to expose bias through hoax academic papers that were published in prominent academic journals is reportedly facing dismissal.
Peter Boghossian, an assistant professor of philosophy at Portland State University in Oregon, admits that he and two other scholars submitted a total of 20 “intentionally broken” and “nonsense” papers on topics including gender, race and sexuality.
The Times reports that the spoofs featured “very shoddy methodologies including incredibly implausible statistics”, as well as “ideologically motivated qualitative analyses” and “claims not warranted by the data”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
One submission - titled Our Struggle is My Struggle: Solidarity Feminism as an Intersectional Reply to Neoliberal and Choice Feminism - was later revealed to be a direct re-write of chapter 12 of Adolf Hitler’s 1925 book Mein Kampf with feminist “buzzwords switched in”, says the newspaper. The spoof was one of seven from Boghossian and his collaborators that were accepted by peer-reviewed journals last year.
Another paper described dog parks as “rape-condoning spaces of hegemonic masculinity”, and claimed to have involved the examination of “10,000 dogs’ genitals”.
Among the other arguments made by the hoaxsters were that the science of astronomy is “intrinsically sexist” and that morbid obesity is a healthy life choice.
Some of the papers advocated “highly dubious ethics” such as “punishing white male college students for historical slavery by asking them to sit in silence in the floor in chains during class”, adds The Times.
All of the published papers were retracted once the true identities and motives of the authors had been revealed.
Boghossian said: “We wanted to see if these disciplines that we called ‘grievance studies’ are compromised by political activism that allows for the laundering of prejudices and opinions into something that gets treated as knowledge.”
However, Portland State University has initiated disciplinary action against Boghossian for what it calls a “breach of the institution’s ethical guidelines”. University bosses argue that he studied “human research subjects” - a reference to the staff and peer-reviewers of the journals - without proper ethical approvals, reports The Washington Times.
A second charge relating to the falsification of data is under review and may potentially cost the professor his job.
Boghossian said: “Portland State University, like many college campuses, is becoming an ideological community and I’ve demonstrated that I don’t fit the mould. I truly hope the administration puts its institutional weight behind the pursuit of truth but I’ve been given no indication that’s what they intend to do.”
He has received support from leading academics including evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, who in a letter to Boghossian said that his first response on reading about the investigation was to “let out a howl of incredulous mirth”.
Harvard University psychology professor Steven Pinker has also spoken out in defence of Boghossian, saying: “This strikes me (and every colleague I’ve spoken with) as an attempt to weaponise an important [principle] of academic ethics in order to punish a scholar for expressing an unpopular opinion.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Duchess of Gloucester: the hard-working royal you've never heard of
Under The Radar Outer royal 'never expected' to do duties but has stepped up to the plate
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Are 'judge shopping' rules a blow to Republicans?
Today's Big Question How the abortion pill case got to the Supreme Court
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Climate change is driving Indian women to choose sterilization
under the radar Faced with losing their jobs, they are making a life-altering decision
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
FBI arrests Cornell student for allegedly threatening to rape and murder Jews
Speed Read The junior engineering student reportedly confessed to posting the vile messages to a Greek life online forum
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Can British universities keep up with global rivals?
Today's big question UK is losing ground to competitors, with China edging up the rankings
By Felicity Capon Published
-
Pros and cons of the International Baccalaureate
Pros and Cons IB offers a more holistic education and international outlook but puts specialists looking to study in the UK at a disadvantage
By The Week Staff Published
-
The class of ‘23: worst off school-leavers yet?
Talking Point The generation who lost critical months of schooling and weren’t able to sit their GCSEs now approaching a dysfunctional university
By The Week Staff Published
-
The UK students taking on universities over Covid disruption
feature Claimants say they received poor service and felt like ‘lowest form of life in food chain’
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
University life in the UK and US compared
feature Studying in the UK offers proximity to home, while US institutions tend to offer broader curriculum options
By The Week Staff Published
-
The pros and cons of going to university
Pros and Cons Record-high costs and competition leave A-level students questioning worth of a degree
By Harriet Marsden Last updated
-
Is it time to rethink the value of a university degree?
podcast Critics say record numbers of higher education students not being offered value for money
By The Week Staff Published