Is internet addiction real?
Up to 8% of Americans ‘diagnosed’ as growing digital dependency spawns host of new treatment programmes
Internet addiction has become such a problem in the US that special treatment programmes have begun to spring up to help wean young people off their digital dependency.
Neither the World Health Organisation not the American Psychiatric Association recognise internet addiction as a disorder, “but a growing number of medical experts has begun taking the condition seriously”, says Tech Times.
Characterised by a loss of control over internet use and disregard for the consequences of it, Reuters says it now “affects up to 8% of Americans and is becoming more common around the world”.
A recent survey in South Korea, which is thought to have the world’s highest rate of problematic internet use among both children and adults, put the share of three-to nine-year-olds at high risk of smartphone and internet addiction at 1.2% and that of teenagers at 3.5%.
The Economist on iNews says “that may not seem a lot, but when it happens the effects can be devastating. Some of these children are on their phones for at least eight hours a day and lose interest in offline life. Having tried and failed to wean them from their devices, their desperate parents turn to the government, which offers various kinds of counselling, therapy and, in extreme cases, remedial boot camps.”
Kimberly Young, who founded the Center for Internet Addiction in 1995, told Reuters psychiatrists are seeing more and more cases of internet dependency, prompting a wave of new treatments across the US.
One such centre offers an in-patient treatment called “Reboot”, which specifically targets internet addiction in children from 11 to 17 years old.
According to Tech Times, the 28-day programme “helps those who have addictions that include online gaming, online gambling, social media, pornography, and sexting — often to escape the symptoms of mental illnesses such as depression”.
Reboot’s clinical director of addiction services, Chris Tuell, says the internet, while not officially recognised as an addictive substance, similarly hijacks the brain’s reward system by triggering the release of pleasure-inducing chemicals and is accessible from an early age.
He says he started the programme after seeing several cases where young people were using the internet to “self-medicate” instead of drugs and alcohol.
However, because the internet is ubiquitous and essential in schools, homes and the workplace, the answer is not about getting sober but rather moderation.
But not all are convinced.
“Although there are clear instances of overuse, terms like 'addiction' or 'compulsive use' may be overblown,” says The Economist. “There is no real evidence that spending too much time online severely impairs the user’s life in the longer term, as drug abuse often does.”
“The relationship between the use of digital technology and children’s mental health, broadly speaking, appears to be u-shaped,” says the magazine. “Researchers have found that moderate use is beneficial, whereas either no use at all or extreme use could be harmful.”
In the UK, the Daily Mirror reports that children as young as 11 are being taken into care over fears they are addicted to gaming.
An investigation by the paper found 13 kids were removed from families over the course of two months due to concerns over computer overuse.
“In what is believed to be the first cases of their kind, some of the youngsters were taken away because of their own addiction, while others were neglected by parents playing the games too much themselves,” says the Daily Mail.
Last year, the WHO formally recognised Gaming Disorder following years of research in China, South Korea and Taiwan, where doctors have called it a public health crisis.
WHO spokesman Tarik Jasarevic said internet addiction is the subject of “intensive research” and consideration for future classification.