Cairncross Review: can Google and Facebook news be regulated?
Government probe urges tech firms to push users towards more reliable sources
Tech giants Google and Facebook should do more to help people identify fake news and steer them towards more credible sources, a Government report has urged.
The Cairncross Review, an audit into the sustainability of quality reporting led by Dame Frances Cairncross, a former economic journalist, says that websites collating and promoting news have a responsibility to assess the authenticity of sources and “nudge people towards reading news of high quality.”
The review says that measures should be taken to incentivise “the provision and consumption of public-interest news” in a bid to improve the public’s perception of the media and their engagement with political matters, The Sun reports.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Since the US presidential elections in 2016, tech firms have been under fire from government bodies, with critics accusing them of spreading “fake news”. The spread of inaccurate news stories on social media was partly attributed to Donald Trump winning the election, The Daily Telegraph says.
While some tech firms, notably Facebook, are attempting to combat the rise of fake news, social media users are still shown news stories that they’re likely to agree with, the newspaper says.
In an interview with the BBC, Cairncross said the report had suggested a number of different ways in which technology companies could “behave differently and could be made to behave differently.” In most cases no immediate legislation would be required, she said.
Cairncross warned that “draconian and risky” legislation could force tech companies to withdraw their news platforms altogether.
How could tech giants be regulated?
The review says that Google, Facebook and other major players should be placed “under regulatory scrutiny” as the task of filtering out unreliable news sources is “too important to leave entirely to the judgment of commercial entities.”
But forcing tech companies to vet every story shared on their online platforms would be a step “too far”, iNews reports.
The report rejected the idea of giving tech giants the same obligations as news publishers. This means they would not have “legal liability for sharing false stories”, the news site adds.
Instead, a new regulator could be used to oversee the relationship between publishers and tech giants, which draw much of their advertising revenue from news outlets, The Guardian says.
There are also plans to force tech companies to provide publishers with “early warnings” about any major changes to news gathering algorithms which dictate the order of search results, the Daily Mail says.
How have journalists reacted?
The report has been welcomed by the Society of Editors, a group of journalists campaigning for media freedom, though it warns that “government-imposed regulation” could do more harm than good, The Sun reports.
Ian Murray, the society’s executive director, said he found it “extremely gratifying” that the review “underscored the need to protect and indeed reinvigorate the reporting of local democracy and open justice.”
But he also said that the UK press had not fought “long and hard” to maintain its independence and freedom to then find itself regulated by state-appointed bodies, “no matter how well meaning was their original creation.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'Make legal immigration a more plausible option'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
LA-to-Las Vegas high-speed rail line breaks ground
Speed Read The railway will be ready as soon as 2028
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Israel's military intelligence chief resigns
Speed Read Maj. Gen. Aharon Haliva is the first leader to quit for failing to prevent the Hamas attack in October
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
How social media is limiting political content
The Explainer Critics say Meta's 'extraordinary move' to have less politics in users' feeds could be 'actively muzzling civic action'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Artificial history
Opinion Google's AI tailored the past to fit modern mores, but only succeeded in erasing real historical crimes
By Theunis Bates Published
-
Is Google's new AI bot 'woke'?
Talking Points Gemini produced images of female popes and Black Vikings. Now the company has stepped back.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Cyberflashing, fake news and the new crimes in the Online Safety Act
The Explainer UK's first conviction demonstrates scope of controversial law that critics describe as a threat to privacy and free speech
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Why Google search results have 'gotten worse'
Under The Radar Search engines are 'flooded' with 'garbage' content, say experts
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
2023: the year of the AI boom
the explainer This year, generative artificial intelligence bypassed the metaverse and became the next big thing in tech
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Twitter's year of Elon Musk: what happens next?
Why Everyone's Talking About 'Your platform is dying', says one commentator, but new CEO is aiming for profitability next year
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Turns out Facebook isn't as polarizing as previously thought
Talking Point New studies show that, contrary to prior belief, the algorithm has little effect on driving polarization
By Theara Coleman Published