In Brief

Cheryl Grimmer: toddler’s alleged killer walks free as case collapses

The three-year-old vanished from Australian beach in 1970 but case was reopened based on teenager’s confession

A  man accused of murdering a British-born toddler who vanished in Australia in 1970 will not face trial after a judge ruled that his confession was not admissible in court.

Three-year-old Cheryl Grimmer disappeared outside a shower block at Fairy Meadow Beach in the Illawarra region of New South Wales on 12 January 1970, less than two years after her family emigrated from Bristol.

In 1971, a 17-year-old boy told police that he had kidnapped and murdered the young girl. He said he had intended to rape her but panicked and strangled her after she started screaming.

However, authorities decided that they did not have enough evidence to support his confession and he was not charged, The Daily Telegraph reports.

Cheryl’s remains have never been found and both her parents died without knowing what happened to her.

In 2011, Cheryl was officially declared “dead but missing” and the investigation was reopened as a homicide case.

Six years later, the suspect who had previously confessed was arrested in Melbourne and charged with abducting and murdering the child.

The British-born accused - who is now his 60s but cannot be named for legal reasons - pleaded not guilty to the charges and a trial was scheduled for May 2019.

But the Supreme Court of New South Wales this week ruled that the 1971 interview could not be admitted as evidence in any trial, because the then-teenager had not had an adult representative present during his confession.

Justice Robert Allan Hulme said that the suspect had been “vulnerable” when he was interviewed by police. Two psychiatrists testified that the teenager had been found to have a “low average intelligence, was immature, and more vulnerable than the average 17-year-old as a result of his disturbed upbringing, difficult relationship with his parents, history of running away from home, moving countries, low intellect and limited education”, Australia’s ABC News reports.

Hulme added that the Crown “accepts that its case cannot succeed without it”, effectively vetoing the possibility of a trial.

Following the ruling, Cheryl’s 45-year-old brother, Ricki Nash, told reporters that he was “shocked” by the decision.

“Am I angry? I’m past that. Do I want revenge? You betcha,” he said.

“He walked in and gives you a full confession and you let him walk away? The laws were different back then - he’d probably have been tried and convicted - now he hides behind a technicality.”

The Director of Public Prosecutions confirmed that there would be “no further proceedings” in the case. 

New South Wales Police said the force “is assessing its legal options following the court’s decision”, adds The Sydney Morning Herald.


Barnsley displayed on Kim Kardashian’s behind
Kim Kardashian
Tall Tales

Barnsley displayed on Kim Kardashian’s behind

‘You’ll have to dip your hands in blood to get rid of me’
Today’s newspaper front pages
Today’s newspapers

‘You’ll have to dip your hands in blood to get rid of me’

Will China invade Taiwan?
Chinese troops on mobile rocket launchers during a parade in Beijing
Fact file

Will China invade Taiwan?

Is the US Supreme Court fit for purpose?
US Supreme Court

Is the US Supreme Court fit for purpose?

Popular articles

Are we heading for World War Three?
Ukrainian soldiers patrol on the frontline in Zolote, Ukraine
In Depth

Are we heading for World War Three?

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 7 July 2022
10 Downing Street
Daily Briefing

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 7 July 2022

Nato vs. Russia: who would win in a war?
Nato troops
Today’s big question

Nato vs. Russia: who would win in a war?

The Week Footer Banner