In Brief

Laws on non-disclosure agreements to change

Legislation around ‘gagging-orders’ used by employers to be changes following Philip Green scandal

Laws governing the use of non-disclosure agreements could be changed, following a number of high-profile cases where they were used by influential figures to conceal sexual harassment claims.

New proposals to be unveiled by the government this week would prevent employers using gagging clauses to conceal sexual harassment, intimidation and racism complaints.

The Guardian says “ministers have decided to act following high-profile cases including that of Sir Philip Green, chairman of Arcadia Group, who is alleged to have used NDAs  [non-disclosure agreements] to prevent several former employees from speaking out about their experiences of bullying and sexual assault”.

The Financial Times says the case “has started a public debate about the effectiveness of such gagging clauses and when they should be used”.

The new changes, which follow recommendations by a committee of MPs, “could help eliminate clauses within some NDAs that strip women of their pay-offs if they go to the police after they have signed settlement agreements” says the Daily Telegraph, which first reported the Green allegations.

Announcing the move as part of a wider plan to increases fairness in the workplace, business minister Kelly Tolhurst said:

“Many businesses use non-disclosure agreements and other confidentiality agreements for legitimate business reasons. What is completely unacceptable is the misuse of these agreements to silence victims, and there is evidence that this is becoming more widespread. Our proposals will help to tackle this problem by making it clear in law that victims cannot be prevented from speaking to the police.”

However, Geoffrey Robertson QC, who has called for a change in the law, said the proposed legal changes alone would not go far enough.

“They only allow complaints to the police, who will not act on most of them because casual sexism and racism may not always amount to a criminal offence. You cannot prosecute a culture,” he told the Telegraph.

“Any reform must be about freedom of speech – the right of an employee to reveal disgusting behaviour without being injuncted, i.e. gagged, or sued for damages,” he said, arguing the government should legislate for “a public interest defence to breach of confidentiality actions, which are the actions used by Sir Philip Green and others”.

Recommended

How Britain’s inflation became the ‘worst in the G7’
A man shopping
Talking point

How Britain’s inflation became the ‘worst in the G7’

When are the next rail strikes?
Departure boards show cancelled train services
In Focus

When are the next rail strikes?

Is it safe to swim off Britain’s beaches?
Sewage seen in the sea at Seaford
Today’s big question

Is it safe to swim off Britain’s beaches?

Pros and cons of the monarchy
Royal Family on the balcony of Buckingham Palace during Trooping the Colour in 2015
The great debate

Pros and cons of the monarchy

Popular articles

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 18 August 2022
10 Downing Street
Daily Briefing

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 18 August 2022

Is World War Three on the cards?
Ukrainian soldiers patrol on the frontline in Zolote, Ukraine
In Depth

Is World War Three on the cards?

Inside Adelaide Cottage: Prince William and Kate’s new home ‘away from prying eyes’
William and Kate
In Depth

Inside Adelaide Cottage: Prince William and Kate’s new home ‘away from prying eyes’

The Week Footer Banner