Could a group of children make Trump tackle climate change?
‘Unprecedented’ lawsuit could force administration to rapidly decarbonise American economy
A group of children suing the US government for failing to protect them against climate change could force Donald Trump to rapidly decarbonise the American economy if the courts rule in their favour.
The Juliana v. United States lawsuit, which was first filed in 2015, accuses successive US administrations going all the way back to the 1960s of knowing about the dangers of man-made climate change but not taking sufficient action to protect US citizens from its causes. The suit also alleges that not only did the federal government fail to act to limit global warming, but it also profited from selling coal, oil, and gas rights.
The “unprecedented lawsuit” was “initially dismissed by most legal observers as hopeless,” The Independent says, “but in 2016 a federal judge, Ann Aiken, stunned the government by refusing its attempt to end the case”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Ann Carlson, a professor of environmental law at UCLA, said this was a major development as no court had ever previously upheld the idea the government had a duty to provide its citizens with a safe and stable environment.
“It’d be massive, particularly if they won what they’re asking for, which is get the federal government out of the business of in any way subsidising fossil fuels and get them into the business of dramatically curtailing greenhouse gases in order to protect the children who are the plaintiffs in order to create a safe climate” she says.
Both Barack Obama and Donald Trump have tried, and failed, to get the case thrown out.
Last year, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favour of the 21 young plaintiffs, meaning oral arguments are expected to commence at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in early June.
On Sunday, one of the plaintiffs appeared on the influential US news programme, 60 Minutes, “gaining national recognition” reports 13 KVAL, a radio station from Eugene, Oregon where several of the children are from.
Kelsey Juliana, now a student at the University of Oregon, told the CBS News programme: “This case is everything. This is the climate case. We have everything to lose if we don’t act on climate change right now.”
The case is just one of more than a dozen climate change lawsuits underway in the US right now. Besides suing the government, several counties and cities are seeking damages from coal, oil, and gas companies for contributing to climate change.
“Legal experts say that these lawsuits are long shots and test the limits of what existing jurisprudence covers,” says Vox, “but if they succeed, they could set critical precedents, lead to billion-dollar payouts, and radically reshape the effort to limit global warming.”
“Perhaps the biggest question at stake, observers say, is whether judges can — and should — set climate policy,” writes Julia Rosen in Science Mag.
The government has argued climate policy is best tackled by Congress and the White House, but in her 2016 decision, Judge Aitkin appeared to side with the young plaintiffs, arguing: “Federal courts too often have been cautious and overly deferential in the arena of environmental law, and the world has suffered for it.”
“But even if the trial is halted, it has already forced the Trump administration to give ground on climate change,” says Rosen.
The case has required "the administration to make numerous admissions,” says Michael Gerrard, director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University, “and be much more specific in its scientific claims than it has had to be before.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Are 'judge shopping' rules a blow to Republicans?
Today's Big Question How the abortion pill case got to the Supreme Court
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Climate change is driving Indian women to choose sterilization
under the radar Faced with losing their jobs, they are making a life-altering decision
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
'A great culture will be lost if the EV brigade gets its way'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Why are people and elephants fighting in Sri Lanka?
Under The Radar Farmers encroaching into elephant habitats has led to deaths on both sides
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
How climate change is contributing to global unrest
In Depth Some experts argue that global warming can be tied to rising levels of violence around the world
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Why last-chance tourism is the latest controversial travel trend
The Explainer Race to visit places threatened by climate change 'before it's too late'
By Austin Chen, The Week UK Published
-
The 5 biggest corporate greenwashing fines
The Explainer Pretending to be green can be expensive
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
How air pollution affects the brain
The Explainer Breathing fresh air is becoming more rare
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
It might be time to add a new hurricane category
Under the Radar Any way the wind blows
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The looming extinction of migratory animals
Under the Radar Some species are migrating straight out of existence
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Cicadas are back with a vengeance
Under the radar Beware the cicadapocalypse
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published