Should the UK relax bank ring-fencing rules?
Treasury minister said he hopes to ‘boost competitiveness’ in the City with easing of regulations
The UK government could relax ring-fencing rules on banks to attempt to boost the sector and ignite a “big bang” in financial services.
The move is part of a “broader package of City reforms” proposed by City minister Andrew Griffith that will “boost competitiveness”, reported the Financial Times (FT). It is part of the government’s “long-promised liberalisation” of rules to bring “Big Bang 2.0” to the City of London and “take advantage of ‘Brexit freedoms’”, the paper said.
The ring-fencing rules were introduced in response to the 2008 global financial crisis, which resulted in the government bailing out failing banks with taxpayer money. The rules aim to shield consumer services in case other riskier parts of the bank fail, by requiring the investment arm and retail arm to be separate. Although it took until January 2019 to be fully implemented, it was one of the UK’s “boldest post-crisis reforms”, wrote Politico.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Banks with “more than £25bn in deposits” are required to “formally separate” the investment and retail arms, said the FT, and the ring-fence would remain for the “biggest investment banks” including HSBC, Barclays, NatWest and Lloyds. Other banks with “limited trading operations”, including Santander UK, Virgin Money and TSB Bank, could benefit from relaxing the legislation, reducing the “associated costs and complexity of adhering to it”.
The end of ‘too big to fail’
The government has previously sponsored a review of the regulations and their application. The review, led by the former chief executive officer of Standard Life Aberdeen, Keith Skeoch, found that while the rules were “overly rigid” and needed to be “more adaptable, simpler”, it was recommended they remain in place.
Supporters of the regulations argue that removing them would “endanger financial stability” and a possible return of “too big to fail” banks and future tax payer bail-outs, said Politico. Skeoch said in his review that the regulations had succeeded in “improving financial stability” but the benefits would “diminish with time”.
If the ring-fence was fully removed it “would have to be replaced” with alternatives, Lord Andrew Tyrie, former cross-party banking commission chair, told the FT. He argued the sector has already made “a massive investment in the creation of the ring-fence” but did indicate it needed to “keep up with changes in the industry”.
‘Costs outweigh the benefits’
Those lobbying for the scrapping of the ring-fence argue it would give them a “competitive advantage internationally”, said Politico, as it would allow them “to use their retail deposits to make riskier bets on capital markets”.
UK Finance, which lobbies on behalf of some of the major banks, argued that ring-fencing is no longer required as banks hold “far more capital and liquidity”, reported Reuters. It said that the rules added “complexity and costs” and the “costs outweigh the benefits”.
Skeoch’s review said ring-fencing had the potential to “constrain the competitiveness of UK banks” but added the current impact was not “substantial”.
Politically, reversing the regulations could create a “backlash”, said Politico, saying that it has been “symbolic” as a “post-crisis remedy”.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Richard Windsor is a freelance writer for The Week Digital. He began his journalism career writing about politics and sport while studying at the University of Southampton. He then worked across various football publications before specialising in cycling for almost nine years, covering major races including the Tour de France and interviewing some of the sport’s top riders. He led Cycling Weekly’s digital platforms as editor for seven of those years, helping to transform the publication into the UK’s largest cycling website. He now works as a freelance writer, editor and consultant.
-
Chinese electric cars may be coming to spy on you
Talking Points The Biden administration investigates Chinese electric cars as a potential economic and national security threat
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Is this the end of the big night out?
Talking Point Bar closures and Gen Z teetotallers threaten 'extinction' for 'messy nights on the town'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Did the Biden impeachment inquiry just collapse?
Talking Points Key GOP impeachment inquiry witness Alexander Smirnov says Russian intelligence fed him lies
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Japan is no longer the world's third-biggest economy despite its stock market peaking
Talking Point The country was overtaken by Germany after unexpectedly entering a recession
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
What Elon Musk has to fear from China's 'Tesla killer'
Talking Points BYD is now the world's biggest seller of electric vehicles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Could Fed interest rate cuts tip the election?
Talking Point The central bank could make interest rate cuts during a campaign focused on the economy
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
How long can consumers keep the economy humming?
Talking Point Consumers boosted growth, defying recession warnings. The question is whether 2024 will be different.
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Geopolitics and the economy in 2024
Talking Point The West is banking on a year of falling inflation. Don't rule out a shock
By The Week UK Published