Will ‘secret web pages’ land Google in hot water with the EU?
Search giant is accused of logging user data without their permission
Google has again been criticised for its data practices following the discovery of “secret web pages” that provide advertisers with additional information about user activity.
An investigation by privacy-focused web browser Brave found that Google created “hidden” profiles for its users that contained information about their browsing habits, TechRadar reports.
The information would then be passed on to advertisers, resulting in users being “subjected to targeted adverts”, the tech site says.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Johnny Ryan, Brave’s chief policy officer and the investigation’s leader, submitted the findings to Ireland’s data regulator, which oversees Google’s European operations, accusing the search giant of “exploiting personal data without sufficient control or concern over data protection”, the Financial Times reports.
A Google spokesperson told the FT that the company had not seen the information discovered by Ryan and that it was co-operating with investigations in Ireland and Britain over the firm’s advertising practices.
“We do not serve personalised ads or send bid requests to bidders without user consent,” the spokesperson said.
The discovery means that Google could again find itself in trouble with the European Union over data protection.
In January, the tech firm was fined €50m (£44.8m) by French data regulator CNIL for not providing web users with sufficient information about how their personal data would be processed.
How did Google create the ‘secret web pages’?
Ryan discovered that Google’s Authorised Buyers advertising system, formerly known as DoubleClick, was creating hidden web pages with a “unique address” that “acted as an identifier” bespoke to him, the BBC reports.
The “so-called pseudonymous marker” can help monitor user browsing habits when combined with cookies, a “small piece of code” embedded in a site that tracks user activity on the web, the broadcaster notes.
While user tracking is commonplace on the internet, site owners must seek the permission of its visitors to activate cookies. The issue with Google’s hidden web pages, however, is that users were not given the option to consent to their web activity being tracked.
Ad firms claim the data collected through Google’s Authorised Buyers system is anonymised, but Ryan argues that the information is so detailed that it’s possible for companies to match it with an individual, The Times reports.
Ryan told the FT that the practice is “hidden in two ways: the most basic way is that Google creates a page that the user never sees, it’s blank, has no content, but allows … third parties to snoop on the user and the user is none the wiser.”
He added: “If I consulted my browser log, I wouldn’t have had an idea either.”
So is Google in hot water with the EU again?
Possibly. According to Ryan, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) prohibits companies from processing “any personal data unless you adequately protect it”, The Times reports.
“There is no protection”, he said of Google’s ad pages. “It’s a data free-for-all.”
Google, however, is “perfectly open” about its advertising system and argues that it’s an “industry-wide practice”, the BBC says.
Ultimately, though, it’s up to the Irish Data Protection Commission and the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office to determine whether Google has breached GDPR rules.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Are 'judge shopping' rules a blow to Republicans?
Today's Big Question How the abortion pill case got to the Supreme Court
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Climate change is driving Indian women to choose sterilization
under the radar Faced with losing their jobs, they are making a life-altering decision
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
'A great culture will be lost if the EV brigade gets its way'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Artificial history
Opinion Google's AI tailored the past to fit modern mores, but only succeeded in erasing real historical crimes
By Theunis Bates Published
-
Is Google's new AI bot 'woke'?
Talking Points Gemini produced images of female popes and Black Vikings. Now the company has stepped back.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Why Google search results have 'gotten worse'
Under The Radar Search engines are 'flooded' with 'garbage' content, say experts
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
2023: the year of the AI boom
the explainer This year, generative artificial intelligence bypassed the metaverse and became the next big thing in tech
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Is using Google's Enhanced Safe Browsing mode worth it?
Talking Point The mode has its positives and its drawbacks
By Justin Klawans Published
-
Google is pitching an AI journalism tool to major news outlets
Talking Point News executives find the technology called Genesis unsettling
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Forget junk mail. Junk content is the new nuisance, thanks to AI.
Speed Read AI-generative models are driving a surge in content on fake news sites
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Why hasn't Google enforced its policy to stop climate disinformation?
Talking Point Is Google's acceptance of climate misinformation intentional?
By Devika Rao Published