In Brief

Tiger Woods vs. Phil Mickelson: ‘an old-fashioned money grab’

Golfing adversaries will face off in a pay-per-view event in Las Vegas in November

Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson will face off in an exhibition match in Las Vegas in November, with the winner pocketing $9m.

The pay-per-view event will take place on Thanksgiving weekend at Shadow Creek.

Confirmation appeared on Twitter on Wednesday night, when Woods posted a promotional poster for the challenge.

Mickelson, who only joined the social networking site this week, responded by goading Woods. “I bet you think this is the easiest $9m you will ever make,” he wrote.

The two golfers, who have won 19 Majors and more than $200m in prizemoney over the course of their careers, have been rivals for many years.

“The 48-year-old Mickelson and the 42-year-old Woods have long been adversaries who have seen their relationship mellow in recent years. They’ve played practice rounds together this year at the Masters and the WGC-Bridgestone, were grouped together during the first two rounds of the Players Championship, and have worked together behind the scenes as part of the US Ryder Cup and Presidents Cup efforts,” says ESPN

The Daily Mail calls it a “mouthwatering clash”, but not everyone believes the winner-takes-all showdown is a good idea.

Writing in The Observer on Sunday, Ewan Murray said: “The PGA Tour, which will not sanction the duel as an official event, is thought to be less than enamoured of two of its biggest names going rogue. There is, however, precious little it can do about it.

“Such negative sentiment should actually be more widespread. This is ostentation at its worst. Woods v Mickelson, version 2018, is about as contrived a sporting contest as exists. The fortunes on offer render it borderline offensive.”

And Dan Wetsel of Yahoo says making the event pay-per-view is a terrible idea.

“This feels like a bad sports management thesis come to life. No mention of charity. Nothing about the guys putting up their own cash,” he says. “This is just an old-fashioned money grab.

“Phil and Tiger and everyone else could do it just because it’s a cool idea and whatever money is made could go to the winner’s charity of choice.

“Instead you’re being asked to pay so one of these incredibly rich guys gets a little bit richer.”

Recommended

2021 Ryder Cup: players, tee times and TV coverage
The opening ceremony for the 43rd Ryder Cup at Whistling Straits
In Depth

2021 Ryder Cup: players, tee times and TV coverage

Saracens’ triumphant return to Premiership Rugby
Alex Lozowski’s kicking performance was ‘sensational’
In Focus

Saracens’ triumphant return to Premiership Rugby

‘Netflix of sport’ DAZN in advanced talks to buy BT Sport 
DAZN cameraman
In Focus

‘Netflix of sport’ DAZN in advanced talks to buy BT Sport 

Peloton checks in to hotels and health clubs for future growth 
Peloton exercise bikes
In Focus

Peloton checks in to hotels and health clubs for future growth 

Popular articles

Doctor says we should not sleep naked because of flatulent spraying
The feet of a person sleeping in a bed
Tall Tales

Doctor says we should not sleep naked because of flatulent spraying

Penguins ‘might be aliens’
Penguins
Tall Tales

Penguins ‘might be aliens’

The man tasked with putting a price on 9/11’s lost lives
Kenneth Feinberg at a Congressional hearing
Profile

The man tasked with putting a price on 9/11’s lost lives

The Week Footer Banner