Bridgefy: how Hong Kong protesters are using Bluetooth to dodge surveillance
Privacy app lets users message each other without Wi-Fi connection
Pro-democracy protestors in Hong Kong are using a new private messaging service in a bid to avoid being tracked by local authorities.
San Francisco-based firm Bridgefy’s app doesn’t require a Wi-Fi connection to operate, instead allowing users to chat with each other through a more private Bluetooth connection.
Hong Kong protestors “keen to avoid any interference” from the local authorities have flocked to Bridgefy in droves, Sky News reports. Indeed, data from app analysts Apptopia shows that downloads of the software has surged by almost 4,000% in the past two months.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But while Bridgefy may add a layer of security, some experts warn that the technology isn’t foolproof.
What is Bridgefy?
Unlike chat apps such as WeChat - China’s equivalent to Facebook - and WhatsApp, Bridgefy is an instant massaging service that doesn’t rely on Wi-Fi or mobile networks to operate.
Instead, the service “create its networks” through Bluetooth, says TechCrunch. Although the technology has a maximum range of 100 metres (330ft), Bridgefy uses user handsets to boost - or bridge - the connection to other devices.
It’s not just a peer-to-peer service, either. The app can also be used by a single user to spread messages to groups of people in the nearby vicinity.
In the case of the ongoing protests in the Chinese-ruled territory, hundreds of thousands of demonstrators can communicate with each other and arrange gatherings via Bridgefy thanks to their close proximity to each other, bypassing the need to create dedicated WhatsApp or WeChat groups.
How is the government tracking protestors?
Although there’s been no official word on how authorities are digitally monitoring the protests, reports suggest that Beijing is using tech systems to keep a close eye on the demonstrations.
According to South China Morning Post, images of the protests posted on WeChat by users in Hong Kong are not visible to recipients in mainland China. Posts on Sina Weibo, the Chinese equivalent of Twitter, are also allegedly being censored.
And in June, the BBC reported that WeChat users who discussed the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations were blocked from the platform unless they scanned their face.
By contrast, Bridgefy’s Bluetooth underpinnings makes it far harder for the local authorities to keep track of protesters, as the app dodges the Wi-Fi networks that are supposedly monitored by the government.
Is Bridgefy really hidden from the authorities?
In a word, no. Although authorities will find it more difficult to track users, Bridgefy isn’t totally protected from the local government’s surveillance systems.
Speaking to the BBC, Professor Alan Woodward, a computer security expert at the University of Surrey, said: “With any peer-to-peer network, if you have the know-how, you can sit at central points of it and monitor which device is talking to which device and this metadata can tell you who is involved in chats.
“And, of course, anyone can join the mesh [local network] and it uses Bluetooth, which is not the most secure protocol. The authorities might not be able to listen in quite so easily but I suspect that they will have the means of doing it.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'Voters know Biden and Trump all too well'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Is the Gaza war tearing US university campuses apart?
Today's Big Question Protests at Columbia University, other institutions, pit free speech against student safety
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
DOJ settles with Nassar victims for $138M
Speed Read The settlement includes 139 sexual abuse victims of the former USA Gymnastics doctor
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Instagram hopes that blurring nudity in messages will make teens safer
The Explainer The option will be turned on by default for users under 18
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
How social media is limiting political content
The Explainer Critics say Meta's 'extraordinary move' to have less politics in users' feeds could be 'actively muzzling civic action'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Cyberflashing, fake news and the new crimes in the Online Safety Act
The Explainer UK's first conviction demonstrates scope of controversial law that critics describe as a threat to privacy and free speech
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
TikTok predicts 'creative bravery' trends for 2024
talking point Will it be a banner year for the platform, or will it isolate its biggest audience?
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Elon Musk's 'frivolous' but precedent-setting free speech fight with Media Matters
Talking Point The lawsuit is just the latest in Musk's ongoing tension with social media watchdogs
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Twitter's year of Elon Musk: what happens next?
Why Everyone's Talking About 'Your platform is dying', says one commentator, but new CEO is aiming for profitability next year
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
How AI might influence democracy in 2024
The Explainer Threat from bots and deepfakes stalks key elections around the world next year
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Pros and cons of social media content moderation
Pros and Cons Where do you draw the line between online safety and freedom of speech?
By Theara Coleman Published